Pinned Tweet
Aight so the question is
Is there anyone who’d be willing to take a flier on a washed up, 6’1”, 180lbs, 20 year old third basemen who’s actually playing the best he ever has and can play middle infield and all 3 outfield spots comfortably and is learning 1st and catcher
Please
You did not watch the game
And that’s ok
Dropping them to 7th is also consistent with the logic used to put ND 11th originally
All of this said, I don’t think they should be 7th. But it’s not as surprising as some of the rankings
Miami was ranked number 1.
Then they went on the road.
At night.
To Notre Dame.
Without Malachi Toney.
And lost by only 1 score.
Them falling to 7 is INSANE.
4
This was from 2 days ago
Boise has the G6 auto bid, that’s why I listed them 12th
Honestly I wasn’t too far off the actual playoff field
A lot of surprises from the committee today but they’re all good changes. I just made a listing based off what I expected
4
These rankings were much better than last week
A lot of the issues were fixed. Some issues still but nothing remotely as bad. Last week’s rankings were actually awful lol
Surprised at how big of a drop Miami had and how big of a jump ND had
5
I think ND’s schedule is harder than they’re given credit for but the fact everyone is clowning on us but letting Wake off the hook with fewer .500+ opponents than us is certainly something
Wake Forest Schedule:
Wins:
-Louisville (6-3)
-Virginia (4-5)
-NC State (4-5)
-Stanford (4-5)
-Cal (3-6)
-Purdue (3-6)
-Akron (1-8)
-FCS
Losses:
-Miami (8-1)
Like, I'm sorry, but WTF is this? It's their 10th game of the season and they have played TWO teams with a winning record. TWO!
ACC is 💩💩💩💩
7
Marcus Newling retweeted
“Give it all you got for somebody else! For your team! For your family! For Notre Dame!”
- Marcus Freeman in his pregame speech Saturday night
Notre Dame dropped a 10-minute video behind the scenes of the win over Miami. (via @NDFootball)
Wisconsin just got dog walked 30-0 by Iowa
What do you mean “3 winnable games” you’re not even ranked anymore
Notre Dame fans saying "there's no downside to playing the Irish" and wondering why anyone wouldn't schedule them, let me put it this way...
Notre Dame on the Wisconsin schedule was cool, but had the Badgers played a layup, right now they'd be 3 winnable games away from the CFP
21
If I’m reading it properly you’re using trading a 34 year old WR on a 1 year deal and a mid-at-best WR who’s had 1 season over 800 yards to say not trading a top 3,(5 at worst), RB who’s on a 3 year deal is dumb
Maybe that’s wrong, but that’s what I’m reading
10
Marcus Newling retweeted
Welp... Might be time to dust off the old Reeboks.... 🤷🏾♂️ Has the player-Coach thing ever happened before?
Only disappointment is the Grover Stewart no-deal but hopefully he plays another year and resigns so we don’t lose out on that value
Colts' trade deadline process was pretty solid. Actively shopped players on expiring deals that the next GM wouldn't be able to keep anyway.
Any player under contract could be had for a very high price, but if the price is not met, we'd rather let the next GM decide on them
18
That’s a good slew of picks and a lot of cap
There can be differing opinions on trading/not trading Taylor and Nelson etc, but they did good setting up next season’s plan. And this doesn’t even include cutting Jones,(if they do)
They’re not on as bad of a spot as people think
Colts 2027 draft picks:
2nd
3rd
3rd (SEA)
4th
4th (KC)
4th (SF)
5th
5th (KC)
5th (potential comp)
6th (SF via BAL)
6th (potential comp)
7th (Buffalo’s I assume)
1
67
Marcus Newling retweeted
Colts stood firm on what they wanted for JT, told y’all from jump they didn’t really want to trade him unless an offer blew them away. Y’all decided y’all didn’t want to listen to that and now shocked when he wasn’t moved.
It was dumb af not to take the 4th+ for Grover.
“One of our best pass catchers” who? Keenan Allen?
Because I know you ain’t talking about it Josh Downs who was getting outpaced by Keenan Allen
Also that linemen was on an expiring contract, just like Downs and Allen
You know who isn’t? Taylor
Colts: "we're not trading our expensive 27-year-old RB or our expensive terrible QB, but we will trade away every one of our pass catchers and our best offensive lineman"
1
100
I’d actually push back on drafting and starting a QB
I think they just start Riley all year
They have a 2028 1st and most of the big name QB prospects in the 27 class are probably staying in college
By not trading Daniel Jones, it tells me that Carlie Irsay doesn’t want to eat Jones’ salary just to have to pay another (likely even worse) bridge QB in 2027.
Seems like the Colts will draft a QB and eventually start that guy in ‘27
11



















