Matthew Hartke (@MatthewHartke) header
Matthew Hartke (@MatthewHartke) profile picture

Post-Christian Bible nerd endlessly fascinated with the historical Jesus and the origins of Christianity (he/him)

Portland, OR
Joined February 2020
Photo by Matthew Hartke (@MatthewHartke)Photo by Matthew Hartke (@MatthewHartke)Photo by Matthew Hartke (@MatthewHartke)Photo by Matthew Hartke (@MatthewHartke)Photo by Matthew Hartke (@MatthewHartke)Photo by Matthew Hartke (@MatthewHartke)Photo by Matthew Hartke (@MatthewHartke)Photo by Matthew Hartke (@MatthewHartke)Photo by Matthew Hartke (@MatthewHartke)Photo by Matthew Hartke (@MatthewHartke)
Why am I still so interested in Christian origins? The way I figure it, either the birth of Christianity tells us something incalculably valuable about the nature of the universe, or it tells us something incalculably valuable about ourselves. There’s gold there either way.
14
9
2
83
Seconded
I was raised in a community that had regular miracles, prophecies ever week from local and traveling prophets, and lots of spiritual warfare. And I've visited many others. I've seen how those plausibility structures work from the inside and out. And I don't share your credulity.
2
6
316
Matthew Hartke retweeted
Replying to @thechosentv
This happens right before Jesus gets the infinity stones, end of Luke I think
6
5
358
11,845
Beyoncé reading my Twitter thread about The Case for Christ
Matthew McConaughey reading The Case for Christ during a workout.
1
2
361
This is how Lee Strobel describes his journalistic ethic before becoming a Christian, but it perfectly describes the problem with The Case for Christ. A couple scattered sentences give him plausible deniability, yet the premise of the entire book is “a ploy to mislead people”.
1
5
183
No AI was used on this image
83
Mark must have been pretty innovative, unprecedented, and unparalleled to have had such an outsized influence on both Matt and Luke. Case in point: When they don’t have Mark to rely on at the beginning and end of their stories, Matt and Luke go completely off the rails.
4
1
15
874
Even if Luke knew and used Matthew too, that would mean he read Matt’s infancy and resurrection narratives, saw no corroboration in Mark, and felt he could do better.
1
6
206
Any reconstruction of the historical Jesus that does not include the many, many instances from our earliest sources in which Jesus tells stories that end with the messianic figure slaughtering multitudes does not deserve to be called a historical reconstruction.
"As for these enemies of mine who did not want me to rule over them—bring them here and slaughter them in my presence."
2
7
447
Matthew Hartke retweeted
It’s happening again! (2 Peter is a forgery.) teapaw.org/hollywoodw35130/status…
Replying to @JoelMCurzon
🤣😂🤣🤣🫵🏼 👉🏼 2 Peter 3:3–4 said the last-days scoffers would show up saying exactly this: “Where is the promise of his coming? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all things are continuing as they were from the beginning of creation.” Paul didn’t miss the date. Peter already answered the mockery you’re repeating. A day with the Lord is as a thousand years (2 Pet 3:8). The delay is patience, not a failed prediction, “not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance” (3:9). The same chapter says the day still comes like a thief. “Closer than we’ve ever been” is just arithmetic. Every day after the cross is closer than the day before. The fathers already fell asleep. You’re in the verse. 🤣😂🫵🏼
2
5
1
25
810
Matthew Hartke retweeted
So I recently chose to accept an invitation to appear on Joe Rogan’s podcast. The interview is live now. youtu.be/GMwihA5jnhY
168
97
42
2,018
180,366
Matthew Hartke retweeted
God’s main goal is a loving relationship. And that’s why he stays hidden, invisible, unapproachable, uncommunicative, inactive, unhelpful and ‘mysterious’. All of which are perfect characteristics of a loving relationship.
1
6
106
Shout out to all my fellow nonexistent nonresistant nonbelievers
Is God’s Main Goal to Get People to Believe in Him?
3
1
22
2,073
Matthew Hartke retweeted
"Scripture interprets scripture" just means "My favorite scriptures, or my favored theological system, overule disruptive scriptures." Early Christianity was, from its inception, theologically diverse.
3
19
408
Matthew Hartke retweeted
Conservative Christians inoculate themselves against the profound problems found in early Christian teaching by reading only those texts deemed "orthodox," and then by reading these approved texts in light of some theological construct that harmonizes and smooths out rough edges.
1
1
1
24
724
Matthew Hartke retweeted
The plausibility of theism takes a dramatic dive without an afterlife. But if you admit this, you are implicitly conceding that the actual evidence of our world is very unexpected on theism. You’re admitting that the world as we know it doesn’t fit. We need to imagine an additional world radically different from our own in order to make theism make sense.
36
18
4
146
7,997
Matthew Hartke retweeted
Now apply that to Eternal Conscious Torment.
Replying to @Benthamsbulldog
Allow me to introduce you to the concept of a “reductio ad absurdum” / “Moorean shift.” When you post the article “why raping babies for fun is morally permissible,” dont be surprised when people take your conclusion to be the surest refutation of your specious arguments in support of it.
6
5
121
5,779
Guy who thinks it's perfectly good and loving to maximally torture most humans for literally all eternity calls someone else anti human for for thinking that 100 rats might be worth the life of one human all else equal.
2
22
480
The most Schweitzerean church sign I’ve ever seen, but somehow I doubt that’s what they were going for.
1
7
731