Rockarchaeologist. Varón humano adulto. Catedrático de Twitter. Ñoño is the new sexy. Slytherin. Los pronombres son 1st World Problem. わたしはあなたにどういしま 🐸
Coacalco de Berriozábal
Joined July 2014
- Tweets112K
- Following1K
- Followers16.4K
- Likes68.3K
No, no soy especial ni único pero toda persona que me haya tratado sabe que odio con la fuerza de mil soles dos cosas que la mayoría de la gente cree que son buenas:
a) que me llamen “inteligente”; y
b) que coqueteen o me galanteen.
Que mierdas, ambas cosas me enfurecen. 🤬
Melanova ☭ retweeted
This is a big deal. The thing that has haunted me from my interviews with detransitioners is how the medical establishment completely abandoned them when they decided to reverse course.
Melanova ☭ retweeted
André Janones, el diputado brasileño que armó el Exército do Lula (canal de WhatsApp que llegó a más de 10 millones) y ayudó a voltear las redes en las elecciones de 2026, aclaró hoy que su estrategia nunca fue bloquear cuentas de extrema derecha. Es 𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗼𝗿𝗮𝗿 𝗽𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝘂𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝘀. El algoritmo premia cualquier engagement, aunque sea para criticarlos o desmentirlos. Nosotros somos muchos y estamos mejor unidos: podemos secar su alcance simplemente no reaccionando y ocupando el espacio con lo nuestro.
𝗤𝘂é 𝘀í 𝗵𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗿 (pasos de la estrategia):
- Cuando aparezca un post de ellos en tu feed, ignóralo: no abras, no leas, no pases más de un segundo y sigue de largo.
- No des like, no comentes, no respondas, no compartas ni interactúes de ninguna forma.
- El algoritmo interpreta que el contenido no es relevante para ti y lo muestra a menos gente.
- Enfoca tu energía en crear, compartir y amplificar nuestro contenido, hashtags y mensajes propios.
- Organízate en grupos coordinados (como el de ellos) para actuar juntos y ocupar el espacio digital.
𝗟𝗼 𝗾𝘂𝗲 𝗻𝗼 𝘀𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗯𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗿:
- No bloquees las cuentas: el algoritmo entiende que no lo viste porque lo bloqueaste, no porque lo ignoraste, y eso no reduce su alcance igual.
- No intentes desmentir o reaccionar directamente en sus posts: cualquier engagement (bueno o malo) les da más distribución.
- No pases tiempo viendo sus videos o leyendo sus textos.
𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗮 𝗱𝗲 𝗰𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗿 𝗮𝗹𝗴𝗼 𝗾𝘂𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗼𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗻 𝘂𝗻𝗮 𝗶𝗺𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻:
- Toma una captura de pantalla (imagen) y publícala en tu propio post o en grupos nuestros, explicando el punto sin enlazar ni interactuar en el original. Así no les das engagement.
Comparte este mensaje con tus contactos y grupos. Diles a otros cómo funciona. Nosotros somos muchos, ellos dependen de que reaccionemos para existir en las redes. Mejor unidos, podemos ganar el espacio digital sin alimentar su propaganda. ¡vamos unidos!
@AndreJanonesMG
Ligas:
teapaw.org/andrejanonesmg/status/… teapaw.org/andrejanonesmg/status/…
🚨 ATTENTION! People are mistranslating what I said!
I NEVER said people should block far-right accounts. I said they should IGNORE THEIR POSTS!
Blocking actually works against this strategy because the algorithm will understand that you didn’t see the content simply because you blocked the account.
However, when a post appears in your feed and you ignore it, you don’t read it, don’t like it, don’t comment on it, or engage with it in any way , the algorithm will interpret that content as irrelevant because it was shown to you and you chose not to engage with it!
THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BLOCKING CONTENT AND IGNORING IT!
Mi mamá puso una ofrenda de Día de Muertos tan mini que cada que la veo me acuerdo de ese chiste en Zoolander de “¿Qué es esto, un centro para hormigas? ... ¿Cómo van a aprender a leer si ni siquiera caben en el edificio?”.
Hoy en “Mis aventuras analizando opiniólogos y comentócratas”…
A juzgar por el comportamiento de los bots, trolls y “líderes de opinión” (mercenarios de los medios vendidos a las oligarquías), de verdad lo de Brasil les tomó bien por sorpresa, tanto que tardaron en reaccionar.
Es en serio, desde la mañana del domingo ya estaban dando por sentado que había ganado Bolsonaro, que cuando no fue así, se les fue el internet y no les regresó hasta el martes.
Tardaron en depurar la granja de bots, supongo.
Melanova ☭ retweeted
Muito obrigado, querida presidenta @Claudiashein. Foi um prazer receber sua chamada telefônica no dia de hoje. Esta não é apenas uma vitória do povo brasileiro, mas de todas as democracias latino-americanas. Seguiremos juntos para defender as nossas soberanias e estreitar os laços de amizade e cooperação entre Brasil e México!
Melanova ☭ retweeted
I was 'supportive' of 'trans' people until I discovered:
👉 How deeply misogynistic the movement is
👉 How deeply homophobic
👉 How regressive
👉 How it seeks to suppress free speech
👉 How it advocates for putting minors on a sterilising medical pathway and having their body parts chopped off before they can even vote or get a tattoo or drive a car
👉 How it erodes the rights of the groups of people they claim to 'identify as'
👉 How it seeks to drive a wedge between parents and their children
👉 How completely and utterly unhinged a movement it is
👉 How it seeks to suppress and misrepresent evidence
👉 How it constantly uses emotional blackmail to make their 'case'
👉 It is a sham of a civil rights movement, just as a man saying "I'm a lady!" is a sham
So yeah... 'trans'... what's not to like, 'ey?
Happy to share a vid where I reflect on why I no longer support 'trans' 👀
youtube.com/watch?v=vDEJhl_5…
Melanova ☭ retweeted
I hope people read this one - JK Rowling’s latest essay makes excellent points, directly & dutifully, as she continues to advocate for women, girls & gays.
If you read anything today, please read this - “When it came to civil, gay and women’s rights, ordinary people who had little to no individual power organised at a grassroots level to challenge powerful institutions, from government downwards, on their entrenched prejudices, and campaigned to change harmful, discriminatory treatment.
Twenty-first century trans activism is the very inverse of those movements. It is elitist to its core.”
🎯
I wrote a new piece about women’s rights and whether or not I want trans people dead. (Spoiler: I don’t)👇
jkrowling.com/opinions/an-up…
Melanova ☭ retweeted
Hunter Schafer, a man, said he feels like a woman because of an "attraction to misogyny" and a "need to be used by men", and trans activists are responding by saying this is a normal experience for women.
1. He's a man with a fetish
2. Women aren't defined by misogyny and being used by men
3. I can't believe this even has to be said - that a man can claim to be a woman explicitly because he hates us, and he is the one who is taken seriously, while women who disagree are called hateful
Hunter Schafer's deleted Instagram post from 2018 is so disturbing that The Daily Mail once mistook it for a school shooter's manifesto.
"My gender was so influenced by a need to be used by men."
"My sexual orientation was not gay, it was not straight, is an attraction, always to misogyny."
"Not feeling femme enough w/o being a victim of r*pe... The idea of being eaten used to arouse me."
Melanova ☭ retweeted
La llamada "transición" me ha enfermado por completo. Bajo la farsa "identidad de género" se nos ha hecho terapia de conversión a homosexuales con pluma a través de medicaciones y cirugías en nuestros cuerpos sanos. Ojalá no haberme dado cuenta de la verdad y seguir en la mentira
Melanova ☭ retweeted
JK Rowling has just written a beautiful essay that I will link to below. This paragraph holds no punches:
“Large numbers of women who’ve never been poor, who’ve never worked the kind of job where they’d be vulnerable to predatory men and who’ve never needed a r*pe crisis centre have spent the last few years vilifying members of their own sex for fighting to retain their hard-won rights and single-sex spaces, in ways that have shocked and disgusted me. I freely confess that I feel an extra layer of abhorrence for any woman who claims to be a feminist while doing it.”