Executive Director, @FFO_Freedom. Former State Dept Cyber. Author of the unpublishable monstrosity, Weapons Of Mass Deletion.

Florida
Joined December 2022
"The History of the Intelligence State" -- an essential 40 min lecture on the origin story of The Blob. Thanks to @Hillsdale for a beautiful event. Timestamps in tweet below
2,859
21,743
1,946
45,146
12,831,048
🚨 THE DEMOCRACY FILES / ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK, PART 4: YES, MANY ARE AWARE OF THE GOALS 🚨 This one is a thread because there are multiple materials. On January 15, 2026, Renew American Democracy (RAD), the strategy built around the Democracy Renewal Group's (DRG) ex-USAID democracy officers, held planning exercises for "emergency scenarios" and how it'd affect their "strategic objectives." RAD's explicit goal is in catalyzing those so-called "emergency scenarios" to manifest "structural reform" - the rewriting of American governance which the previous drops have covered. RAD/DRG hold the unique role within the wider blocking / protest alliance of defining what the new government looks like, presumably because they are made of ex-USAID officers who have specialized in installing new governments. As @MikeBenzCyber last night said on his stream, these DRG members come from the CIA coup parts of USAID. It's been suggested that DRG is just a fringe group within the much larger blocking/protest ecosystem. This morning's interim video mentioning Mike Smith disproved that. And PART 4 disproves that further - the wider network is well aware of DRG and that its goal is to secure a new government. They will dress it in the language that it's Trump who will provoke it, and they're only preventing a true Constitutional crisis. In reality, there's a million ways to interpret what a "red line" is, and many ways to get Trump to cross it. Already, articles everywhere are telegraphing that Trump *will* cross it in the form of the Insurrection Act or martial law, softening us up for the coup ahead. The materials I'm showing you are from a RAD/DRG-ran planning exercise in January 2026. Groups represented by participants include: · National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A) · Freedom Trainers / Beautiful Trouble · Team Democracy · Federal Workers Alliance for Democracy · Civil Service Strong · Project 2029 · Braver Angels · Indivisible · Better Together America · Center for Collaborative Democracy · Democracy Accelerator · Paths to Understanding · Co-Intelligence Institute · Cohesion Strategy · Community-Vision Solutions One of the working groups concerned "National Deliberations" - which lays the groundwork for structural reforms post-crisis. So every single participant in this forum was well aware the end point is rewriting our governance. Even more interesting, Tanya Alfredson of @BraverAngels participated in this particular working group - which should give pause to anyone who believes Braver Angels simply wants better dialogue. As you watch the videos, watch out for the code language they use to hint towards the ultimate end goal. As always, patience as I pull together the thread. 👇
459
7,211
378
15,101
250,334
Good write-up on the bios of the people who have appeared so far. @MikeBenzCyber also did a very sobering analysis of the videos from Part 1, 2, 3. Working on Part 4... it involves documents and PII redactions, so taking a lil'
168
4,172
74
10,582
131,704
Mike Benz retweeted
Live by the sword, die by the sword. Those who pick fights with me should understand that I will find out who is really pulling the strings and come for them, not just their puppets …
12,947
23,817
2,574
173,922
6,735,931
🚨🚨THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 3: AMERICA GETS THE FOREIGN-INTERVENTION TREATMENT 🚨 At what point does this become foreign interference of our elections? To back up: the main group that Danielle Reiff and the other ex-USAID workers belongs to, Renew To Thrive (R2T) / Renew American Democracy (RAD) have an explicit strategy document. That strategy outlines "preparing for the worst" which includes the Insurrection Act or "election meltdown," and their goal is to get "structural reform" in place by that - a polite way of saying our Constitutional Republic has to be overhauled. In July 2026, R2T/RAD invited foreign state actors to share experience with the American community, for the express purpose of operationalizing their expertise right here in the United States. All actors had experience in international community assisted transitions (I'll let you figure out what that is a code word for). The disturbing part, though, is that all of the foreign actors' recommendations were implemented right here in America. You may have seen news headlines like: - Restore trust in processes - Increased election security, increased legal presence at polls - Democratic officials hold tabletop exercises - Judges prepare for post-election challenges To be clear, this video doesn't prove that this meeting specifically caused this cascade of escalations. But what it shows is that the democracy-promotion playbook the U.S. spent decades exporting, with situation rooms, observers at every polling place, prebunking and litigation paired with street mobilization, is now being run on America's own election. The same people are running it, and they're taking advice from the foreign actors the U.S. once backed. Now when you look at officials talking about independent watchdogs or tabletop exercises... know that it's because they are now treating the United States midterms exactly the same as they'd treat elections in a third world country. And I think more than a small part of them are hoping that it does become a self-fulfilling prophecy as it has in so many of those countries. (For context, my book Unelected documents that so-called "election meltdowns" are precursors to transitions of power via color revolution.)
585
10,247
513
21,853
481,199
Watch this video with Danielle Reiff. On the midterms she says a crisis of legitimacy could become a real opportunity for them. Reiff plays a leading role in the Democracy Renewal Group (DRG), which drafted a report assessing democracy in the United States. “Coups have increasingly led to democratic outcomes.” These are their own words. Get out and vote Republican today. Bring your friends. Call others.
🚨🚨THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 1: THE PLAN 🚨 I am working on gathering all the documents. Now, here's something to understand about the "democracy" and protest ecosystem: almost nobody knows the 'grand plan' so to speak. They simply agree to play a role. For example, 99% of people breaking stuff on the streets believe they're doing it out of an organic uprising. They don't see that the police have been ordered to stand down. They don't see that legal services have already been arranged for them. They don't see that foundations are paying for their bonds. Similarly here, governors aren't participating in a pact to destroy the Constitution. Governors simply have agreed to push back on the Insurrection Act. The effect is the same: the governors end up playing a role in a grander plan. I call this "shared epistemology" in my book Unelected. Motivations differ, people rarely agree to the big evil supervillain framing, but incentives all converge in the same end goal. No Kings might not agree to explicitly tear down the Constitution, but they nonetheless work with DSA and will turn out millions of people if the right phone call is put in. Here is one articulation of the plan - and crucially, since then, they have put many NGOs in their places to execute their proper role at all levels when the time is right. Many more coming.
22
318
13
785
33,191
🚨🚨THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 2: WHEN AND HOW TO DECLARE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ILLEGITIMATE 🚨 Some questioned whether a group of 200 ex-USAID officials could actually pull off their ambitions to rewrite the Constitution. Here, they describe exactly how it works. They aren't working alone. The videos all come from Renew to Thrive (R2T) group and associates. Danielle Reiff and Paul Zeitz play key roles within R2T. R2T sits inside a much, much larger umbrella called United Democracy Alliance (UDA), which is an extremely hush-hush control plane of leaders from major "blocking" NGOs such as 50501 and Indivisible fulfilling various functions. UDA decides when protests get deployed, timelines, how to respond, all that. R2T's role within UDA is concerned with "the day after tomorrow" - in other words, their function is to conceive what a rewritten American government will look like after the rest of UDA fulfills its purpose. As will be shown, Erica Chenoworth is credited with conceiving UDA in the first place under the Horizons "Big Tent" initiative. Note here that National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A) is credited for operationalizing UDA. NSL4A is a group of 1,600 ex-military, intelligence, and diplomatic officials. They are led by Rear Admiral Michael E. Smith (Ret). NSL4A also played a key role in the "illegal orders" messaging which targeted Pete Hegseth. Zeitz is also a member of NSL4A. It must be emphasized that the choice of a military-oriented organization to coordinate NGOs across domestic protests is an interesting one all in itself - especially in an umbrella conceived by a regime change expert like Chenoworth. You will have a hard time finding any mentions of UDA in the public. They are extremely hush-hush and selective who they talk to. Mike Smith himself makes a personal appearance in other calls, coordinating Insurrection Act exercises and roleplaying with R2G as one of the participants. As the audio transcript shows, they have outlined a sequence of "redlines" in which case the federal government should be declared illegitimate. Invoking the Insurrection Act against "peaceful" protesters is one of the most discussed redlines. I will post the illegitimate criteria below, but basically, almost any effective pushback against NGOs is a measure of illegitimacy according to them. Important to understand: The audio shows they shopped this idea around governors, but the reality is that governors do not have to explicitly sign on to the pact to play their role in the coup. All they have to do is refuse troops in their state and let UDA / R2G do the work of dissolving the federal government.
2,466
18,407
2,392
41,034
2,802,972
In a sane world what’s happening in France would trigger Article 5 of NATO.
882
2,649
179
31,964
538,879
The fact that this emasculated softie was at a Celine Dion concert when this riot broke out adds a level of soy that shouldn’t be legal, even in Europe
🇫🇷Macron on the riots: “How can French people do this to France?”
302
1,761
38
12,462
133,755
Excited to announce I’ll be speaking at @WebSummit in Lisbon Portugal (Nov 9-12) on the future of tech freedom & recent reforms to US soft power
26
93
4
557
41,097
looks like a party, vibe of their recent summer summit tix here & such: websummit.com/
5
8
93
17,560
NEW: One of the censorship industrial complex’s leading organizations just announced its next expansion targets: New York, Virginia, California—and Canada. It’s also changing its name. The Center for Countering Digital HATE is becoming the Center for Countering Digital HARM. The broader mission comes with an expanded operation: • More policy and partnerships staff pursuing changes in the three states. • A Canadian office working directly with policymakers. • A rapid-response research team. • Former Meta researcher Jason Sattizahn joining as chief strategy officer. CCDH’s influence already reaches well beyond publishing reports. During COVID, it demanded platforms remove its “Disinformation Dozen,” including RFK Jr.—along with organizations they controlled and backup accounts. Democratic senators cited that research when urging Facebook and Twitter to remove accounts. Now the group is expanding the teams that turn its research into policy pressure. It already credits its legislative framework with shaping laws and enforcement internationally.
56
614
32
1,188
25,892
REVEALED: UNC researchers are promoting “militant platform democracy”—a framework for Big Tech to prevent political leaders they deem anti-democratic from taking power. They specifically name Trump, argue he should have been banned before January 6, and oppose his subsequent reinstatement. One of the authors, UNC professor Daniel Kreiss, has also been appointed to a research chair at the University of British Columbia backed by C$8 MILLION in Canadian federal funding over eight years. In an October 4 interview, Kreiss explained the objective of proactive platform moderation: “to prevent anti-democratic actors from taking power in the first place” He then singled out Trump: “Trump should have been de-platformed far before January 6th happened.” The paper, co-authored with researcher Lorcan Neill, also argues that Trump should not have been reinstated in 2023 or had remaining restrictions removed in 2024. Their framework is titled: “Militant Platform Democracy: A Framework for Democracy-Worthy Platform Policies.” UNC’s own summary explains that militant democracy allows democratic states to preemptively restrict the rights of individuals, groups and parties that threaten democratic institutions. The researchers propose applying that approach to social-media platforms. Their recommendations include: • Placing the democratic public’s rights above individual rights to expression on commercial platforms. • Drawing a red line around strategic efforts to undermine public faith in elections. • Assigning particular responsibility for democratic norms to political leaders and candidates. • Restricting platform access based on threats to democracy. Who would decide how those principles apply? Kreiss said: “We think platforms should decide for themselves” Neill said the framework could help trust-and-safety employees advocate for changes inside their companies. Meanwhile, UBC describes Kreiss’s new chair as an $8 million federal investment in democratic journalism. His research there will examine how journalism, digital platforms and new technologies shape democratic life.
181
791
102
1,510
48,091
🚨 Chairman @ChuckGrassley reveals SHOCKING new whistleblower discovery in explosive memo today: Jack Smith & Biden DOJ obtained personal data for over HALF A MILLION Republican donors, voters and supporters. At least 639,000 Americans’ data was scooped up by Smith and his team. "Smith and the Biden Justice Department collected incredibly invasive donor data – and voter data – beyond what could conceivably be necessary for Smith or his team to fulfill the Special Counsel’s mandate."
470
1,226
173
3,034
277,446