Pinned Tweet
In Iran in the late 1970’s the academics, thinkers, artists, human rights advocates (sound familiar?) aligned with the Islamists thinking they knew what was right for the country and its future. Little did they know that once the Islamists were in power and had no use for them, they would be discarded only to be persecuted and subjugated.
We are seeing the start of this in the west now. Wake up before it’s too late.
Ms Purple retweeted
In recent months, the BBC had to get rid of its Director General, head of News and now to pay £400,000 to a 22 year-long employee who made documentaries there. All at least partly because of its anti-Jewish, anti-Israel lies and falsehoods. It had a senior reporter broadcast fake news about a Palestinian rocket attack on a hospital in Gaza and obstinately say he didn't regret it when he was shown to be wrong, and made a documentary which secretly starred the son of a Hamas minister whose family it paid with money from the license fee.
Ms Purple retweeted
Three terrorists shooting at a church in Jordan is just the beginning.
Giving legitimacy to ISIS in Syria and handing a significant country like Syria over to hundreds of thousands of jihadists will have consequences that last for a very long time.
I have said it a hundred times since December 2024: Syria will become a hub for terrorism.
Allowing Abu Muhammad al-Julani, who led al-Qaeda’s branch in Syria and previously operated within the Islamic State of Iraq, to rule the Syrian nation-state and gradually transform it into an Islamic caliphate will give hope to jihadists across the region that they, too, can pursue the dream of a caliphate within their own nation-states.
I told White House officials that the administration made a huge, shortsighted mistake, motivated by Saudi and Qatari investment in the U.S. economy.
The region, and ultimately the world, will be paying the price for a very long time.
Ms Purple retweeted
Why were Jonathan Powell, Peter Mandelson and Lord Hermer appointed without vetting?
The answer is that Chagos was a deal Starmer couldn't refuse to make.
Here's a timeline of the key stages of the Chagos treachery.
In 1982, after it became known that the Chagos seabed may contain vast mineral wealth, Mauritius set up a select committee to examine the matter.
However, sea-mining technology was in its infancy, and it was too expensive to be commercially viable at that time.
In 2003, as underwater mining technologies advanced and the value of minerals and rare earth elements soared, mining the Chagos seabed became an exciting possibility again; Mauritius appointed the eminent international barrister Sir Ian Brownlie as advisor for the Chagos Archipelago.
A former member of the Communist Party of Great Britain, Brownlie was a good friend of Sir Satcam Boolell, a former Labour deputy prime minister of Mauritius, and High Commissioner in London.
In 2009, Brownlie led the first Mauritius delegation to the Foreign Office in London seeking a Chagos deal.
Among the delegation was Sir Satcam Boolell's son Satyajit, who became Mauritius Director of Public Prosecutions the same year.
In 2010, after Brownlie died in a motor accident in Egypt, Sir Keir Starmer’s “great mate”, Philippe Sands, a leading human-rights lawyer who has publicly boasted of humiliating the UK in international courts, took over as counsel to Mauritius for Chagos.
In 2013, Satyajit Boolell invited Keir Starmer, whom he had become friendly with during Starmer's time as the UK's DPP, to a legal conference at the 5-star Balaclava resort in Mauritius.
During the trip, Starmer discussed the future of the Chagos Archipelago with then Mauritius prime minister Navin Ramgoolam.
After Starmer’s 2013 visit, Ramgoolam wrote that he and Starmer were aligned over Chagos.
In 2015, Ramgoolam was arrested on money-laundering charges when large sums of cash in foreign currencies, suitcases full of brand-new luxury watches, and blank British visas were found in his home.
Also in 2015, Starmer was elected to the British Parliament.
In 2019, Philippe Sands, after a campaign of lobbying the UN, obtained an International Court of Justice ruling (advisory opinion only, and non-binding) that the Chagos islands should be given to Mauritius.
Sands used the ICJ ruling as leverage in the following years in his efforts to persuade the Conservative government to give Chagos to Mauritius.
In 2020, Starmer became leader of the Labour Party.
In 2021, Sands received Mauritius' top honour, The Most Distinguished Order of the Star and Key of the Indian Ocean.
In 2022, Sands made an unauthorized entry into the Chagos Archipelago for a flag-raising ceremony. Sands tweets at the time, “It’s morning on Chagos, where the flag of Mauritius flies."
In 2023, Sands became a Mauritius citizen, but retains his British and French citizenships.
🧧In November 2023, David Cameron replaced James Cleverly as Foreign Secretary and, with the support of other senior Tories, stopped a Chagos deal saying, it’s not in the national interest, as reported in Hansard.
In July 2024, Starmer became UK Prime Minister and just ten weeks after entering Downing Street, he agreed a deal with Mauritius, despite there having been no mention of Chagos during the election campaign, and the Labour manifesto pledging to protect the BOT.
in November of 2024, Ramgoolam was elected Mauritius prime minister again after a snap general election, and took over from the incumbent PM, Pravind Jugnauth, to lead the Chagos negotiations with the UK.
In December 2024, after 14 years in the role, Philippe Sands steps down as Mauritius counsel for Chagos.
In January 2025, Attorney General Lord Hermer recused himself from signing off on the Chagos deal, and declined to say why.
In February 2025, Jugnauth was arrested on money-laundering charges after large sums of cash in foreign currencies and suitcases full of brand-new luxury watches were found in his home.
In May 2025, twelve years after discussing the future of Chagos in Mauritius, Starmer and Ramgoolam sat down in London to sign the treaty that transfers the archipelago's sovereignty to Mauritius.
The Fall Out.
The Chagos deal does🟥NOT secure the joint UK/US military base on Diego Garcia.
The deal operationally hobbles the base, and increases the dangers to the British and American military personnel, and the civilians who work there, and in the wider Central Indian Ocean region.
Diego Garcia's remoteness made it easy to defend in the past. This deal leaves the base horribly vulnerable to the growing threats posed by the new longer-range missiles, and more sophisticated and lethal drones.
When Keir Starmer, Lord Hermer and Vijay Rangarajan, the Director General at the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, made the deal it was fully understood that the outer islands of the Chagos Archipelago were by far the best locations to deploy early warning, and air-defense systems, to protect the main base from missile and drone attacks.
Yet they still decided to lease only Diego Garcia.
Andy Burnham, Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband, and Defense Minister Wes Streeting, know the deal increases the dangers to the lives of British service personnel, and our NATO allies personnel, in the strategically important Central Indian Ocean region.
To double down and push the deal with that knowledge is a shameful act of betrayal.
While the deal leaves Diego Garcia vulnerable to attack, it also renders the base itself ineffective and operationally hobbled.
Mauritius is a signatory of the Pelindaba African Weapon-Free Zone Treaty which bans all nuclear weapons from treaty members' territory.
Pelindaba gives each of the more the 40 countries who have signed it the right to inspect the facilities on Diego Garcia if they suspect nuclear arms are being stored there.
The UK's nuclear-armed Trident submarines will no longer be able to enter Chagos waters, or visit Diego Garcia which is the only island in the region which has suitable anchorage and facilities for maintenance and restocking provisions, etc.
The US's nuclear-armed submarines, ships, and planes will also be banned from Diego Garcia and the Chagos Archipelago's waters.
Mauritius gets complete sovereignty over everything, including control of the airspace above the Chagos Archipelago, which at 250,000 square miles is the same size as France.
The implications of controlling such a vast area of airspace in a strategically vital region are huge.
Mauritius has shown it will ban planes entering its current airspace when China asks.
The Chagos Deal does not ‘secure the base’. It methodically destroys every element required for operations. The text and annexes state it will:
❌Constrain future Ops and use of the base
❌Prevent the placing of sensors and other maritime installations
❌Require us to sight our foes on defence planning
❌Mean we’re unable to use our preferred contractors
❌See us lose of control over electromagnetic spectrum.
Ms Purple retweeted
If true then this decision needs to be reversed immediately. Self destruction 👇🏽
Ms Purple retweeted
"This is the scene at the Jewish girls school, students dancing to Persian pop songs during lunch break."
"Wearing the hijab is mandatory for all Iranian girls in school from the age of seven"
The latest CNN propaganda for the regime in Iran is on the Jewish community.
I think the worst part was when they cheerfully talked about young Jewish girls being forced to wear hijab, as though this isn't an example of cultural erasure and gender oppression.
Ms Purple retweeted
Al-Jazeera says Christians of Jordan call their sons Muhammad because they are proud of their Arab identity. Christians even invite Muslim Brotherhood leadership to break their fast during Ramadan inside their churches, and Muslims built a mosque on a land owned by Christians.
Al-Jazeera calls it tolerance and coexistence but every element in the story points in the direction of Christians Islamizing (because they need to prove their Arab patriotism or else be suspect of treason and taking the side of the imperial Christian West or Israel). By doing so, Christian numbers have been dwindling, their communities vanishing and their towns turning Muslim (always remember that Bethlehem turned from predominantly Christian to Muslim only a few decades ago).
Perhaps story should have explained how Amman was, until 1920, a Christian majority town, and now the Christians who live in it are a tiny minority who have to stop eating in public during Ramadan.
aja.ws/i62rxh
Ms Purple retweeted
Israel has checkpoints?
Well the Palestinians and leftists had no problem with checkpoints when they terrorized the Lebanese in their own country.
Do the idiots of the “Palestinian cause” mention this or that the “Palestinians” have their own area in Lebanon that only they can enter/exit when protesting apartheid?
No. They do not.
Ms Purple retweeted
If you hate Zionism, believe Israel is the new Nazi Germany, or think Zionists secretly control the world, you need to understand where some of these ideas came from.
Let me take you back to Moscow, 1983.
On March 29, 1983, the Soviet Communist Party approved a KGB proposal to establish the Soviet Anti-Zionist Committee.
Just one year earlier, Mahmoud Abbas, today’s Palestinian Authority President, had defended his doctoral thesis in Moscow, promoting Holocaust distortion and conspiracy theories about Zionist collaboration with the Nazis.
Both emerged from the same Soviet environment of anti-Zionist propaganda.
The committee’s mission was simple: demonize Zionism, discredit Israel, and spread the Kremlin’s narrative worldwide.
But the KGB had a clever strategy.
They deliberately placed Jews at the head of the organization to deflect accusations of antisemitism.
Led by Soviet Jewish General David Dragunsky and supervised by the KGB and Communist Party’s Propaganda Department, the committee became a propaganda machine.
Here is how it worked:
1. Compare Zionists to Nazis. Pravda accused Israel of using Nazi methods and operating concentration camps.
2. Manufacture Jewish opposition to Israel. Soviet media promoted supposed letters from Jewish emigrants claiming they had been deceived by Zionist propaganda.
3. Stage international press conferences. Committee leaders accused Israel of adopting Nazi practices, while TASS and Novosti amplified their accusations worldwide.
4. Export propaganda worldwide. The Soviet Union used international media, publications, foreign language broadcasts, and propaganda networks to spread its anti-Zionist narratives across Europe, the Middle East, and beyond, turning a Kremlin campaign into a global messaging operation.
5. Give propaganda academic credibility. In 1985, the committee published a 300-page White Book portraying Zionism as a global conspiracy and Israel as an instrument of American imperialism.
Meanwhile, the same Soviet regime restricted Jewish emigration and persecuted Jews who wanted to leave for Israel.
Think about that.
More than 40 years ago, the KGB was systematically manufacturing the accusations we hear against Israel today.
Zionism equals Nazism. Israel is an apartheid regime. Zionists manipulate governments. Even Jews supposedly reject Zionism.
Today, these narratives circulate across university campuses, demonstrations, social media, and mainstream political debates.
Perhaps one of the greatest successes of Soviet propaganda is that millions of people today believe they arrived at these ideas entirely on their own.
Before repeating the next accusation about Zionism, ask yourself one question: Who taught the world to think this way?
Ms Purple retweeted
Britain says it is "not an outlier" on the Muslim Brotherhood. Really? In January a Home Office minister told the House of Lords that proscription is "under review" and that the government "will make an announcement in due course if one is required", while France's interior ministry and Germany's intelligence services had already published their own reports on the network.
Almost ten months later there is still no announcement, and the official list of banned terror groups was last touched in July, only to add alternative names for three groups already on it. The Brotherhood is still not there.
In due course, they said. How many more years is that?
BTW, the Muslim Brotherhood is banned in the UAE.
Ms Purple retweeted
The wife of the UK government's national security advisor is openly and publicly declaring that she supports a proscribed group.
Openly supporting terrorism while living under the same room with the government's national security advisor.
Will the police act or does she get some kind of special VIP treatment?
Despicable Labour, a bunch of terrorism-loving filth!
@TerrorismPolice @metpoliceuk @LabourParty
Ms Purple retweeted
I am fascinated by the Jews, not all of them, of course; forget the useful idiots among them. I am fascinated by those who would send any Muslim terrorist to the cosmic brothel of his Allah without hesitating for a second to think about what the world would say about them.
They are not hypocrites like Arab Christians who exchanged freedom, what makes them fully human, for security, and in the end lost both.
I am a Christian, but I wish our people had even 10 percent of that Jewish courage.
Arab Christians live as dhimmis and justify their cowardice with phrases like, “We are persecuted for Christ,” “You remain silent and the Lord defends you,” and “Love your enemies,” stripping biblical passages out of context simply to excuse cowardice.
Even the only prosperous state they built in Lebanon was taken away from them because of their naivety and hypocrisy.
I do not want to be a jerk, and I am not calling on them to do something they cannot do. But at the very least, do not be hypocrites. Do not defend the same ideology that has massacred you for 1,400 years.
Ms Purple retweeted
Just a reminder of how some ‘Australians’ reacted right after the massacre of October 7th, 2023
Not very peaceful.
Former Egyptian Ambassador to Israel Atef Salem explains the deep frustration Muslims carry because Jews are alive and Israel exists.
Even without any land dispute, Muslims in Egypt are fed up with their lives and want to wage war against the Jews nearby. He says they cannot stop hating the Jews and Israel. The mere existence of Jews living next to them is intolerable.
Peace is impossible not because of borders or security wall, but because the presence of living Jews itself demands blood.
What is your response to him?
Ms Purple retweeted
For those of you who thought the visit from a Bedford Borough Council official to investigate our daughter Zoe’s (age 12) pretend teddy bear cafe was too ridiculous to be real, here is the arrival of official. This is totally legit. She really did show up at our property to investigate the illegal teddy bears having their coffee🧸🧸☕️☕️
Ms Purple retweeted
In France, one of the leaders of the riots is Palestinian activist Yazan Majdal Abu Sammour.
In Italy, the main organizer of the riots is pro-Palestinian activist and Arab nationalist Youssef Siher.
What are the odds?!
I’ve been saying this all along. All these far-left movements in America and Europe are directly coordinating with the terrorists in Gaza.
The pro-Palestinian movement is a terrorist movement at its core that seeks not only the destruction of Israel, but the entire Western civilization.























