Unfiltered commentary on geopolitics & culture. I say what others are afraid to say. No PC scripts 🎯 Contacts via: Instagram: Muhammadsaifullah9128
London, England
Joined October 2025
- Tweets566
- Following104
- Followers3.4K
- Likes276
Pinned Tweet
You can catch the full interview on @liamtuffs1 podcast here:
Muhammad Saifullah retweeted
Typical Israeli young voter who's obviously indigenous to the land discusses the situation outside a rally for Itamar Ben Gvir
Ben Gvir's "Jewish Power" party will gain seats in Tuesday's election thanks to youth voters
Christians allowed Satanic Epsteinic juicy take over the West.
They allowed interest-based banks to seize their governments and enslave their nations.
Then they destroyed Christianity themselves with woke feminism, communism & sexual degeneracy .
Now they cry “Islamic takeover.”
Pathetic. @RogueUnfiltered
#Zionism #ChristianDecline #Feminism #ReformUK #politics
Muhammad Saifullah retweeted
Murtadd Salih Al-Fawzan refutes Taghut worshipping Madkhalis on 8th Nullifier
Europeans cry “invasion” over Muslim growth while ignoring Christianity’s own forced conversions by sword. Both religions expanded through conquest, and power.
Islam is filling the vaccume which christianity lost. Young men are not intrested in weak pagan religions. From their natural posession humans are attracted to tawheed of Allah.
Western mainstream never show these radical religious fanatics.
Historic Christianity built confessional societies that enforced own truth and punished heresy.
Liberal secular democracy treats your God as optional opinion and your moral claims as bigotry.
If you defend the latter as “Christian,” you have already chosen the atheist side. Stop lying to yourself.
Muhammad Saifullah retweeted
"The nations before you were destroyed because they used to inflict the legal punishments on the poor and forgive the rich."
Sahih Bukhari 6787
Muhammad Saifullah retweeted
The same guy who starved 500 000 muslim kids to death by sanctions!
Release the Epstein files!!
In Sahih Muslim 1700a, a Jewish scholar admitted: adultery was common among the rich, so they spared wealthy offenders the Torah’s stoning.
For the helpless and poor they enforced it. To equalize treatment they invented blackening the face and flogging instead. The Prophet ﷺ restored the original stoning.
Under Islamic jurisprudence, the Quran explicitly permits expressing words of disbelief ONLY under direct compulsion/coercion (ikrah).
"Whoever disbelieves in Allah after his belief, except for one who is forced while his heart is secure in faith..." (Quran 16:106)
#AbdulElSayed #ilhanomar #Mamdani #Michigan
Prophet Muhammad ﷺ during Hudaybiyah did not a compromise on faith or religious principles, but rather a tactical, political peace treaty (sulh).
Your Johnny sold deen just to be called Johnny!
“Saudi is an American ally” refuted with the Sunnah.
People recite the verse, “O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies” and they think this means you cannot even speak to them or trade with them.
This is a result of not understanding the Arabic language and the context of Revelation.
The Qur'an forbids Wilayah (heartfelt loyalty, religious alliance, and loving their disbelief), but it does not forbid Mu'amalat (worldly transactions, trade, and diplomacy).
If dealing with them were 'Kufr' or 'treason', then how do you explain the actions of the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him)?
• Evidence 1: The Mortgaged Armor
When the Prophet (peace be upon him) passed away, his Zirah (shield/armor) was mortgaged, held as collateral by a Jewish man in exchange for some grain to feed his family.
Reflect on this! The Leader of the Prophets, the Head of the Islamic State, had a business transaction with a Jew until the day he died.
If a total boycott was a religious obligation, would the Prophet (peace be upon him) have taken a loan from a Jew?
• Evidence 2: The Treaty and Partnership of Khaybar
After the conquest of Khaybar, did the Prophet (peace be upon him) expel all the Jews immediately?
No! He entered into a contractual partnership with them. He told them, ‘Stay on this land, farm it, and give us half the produce.’
This was an economic agreement between the Islamic State and a non-Muslim community. This is the wisdom of governance.
• Evidence 3: The Food of the People of the Book
Allah says in the Quran: “And the food of those who were given the Scripture is lawful for you.” (Surah Al-Ma'idah).
If we were meant to be in a state of total, permanent isolation and social boycott, why would Allah make their slaughtered meat and their food permissible for us to eat?
• Evidence 4: The Migration to Abyssinia
When the Sahaba were being persecuted in Makkah, where did the Prophet (peace be upon him) send them for safety?
He sent them to Abyssinia, to a Christian King (the Negus). He didn't say, “They are Christians, so stay away.”
He said, “Go there, for there is a King who does not wrong anyone.”
He sought asylum and protection for the Muslims within a Christian kingdom because of that King's justice.
• Evidence 5: The Treaty of Hudaybiya
In the Treaty of Hudaybiya, the Prophet (peace be upon him) accepted conditions that seemed humiliating to the Muslims at the time. Even a companion as great as Hazrat Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) was distressed by the terms. But the Prophet (peace be upon him) signed it.
Why? Because it brought a strategic peace that allowed the Message to spread.
This proves that a leader can make a 'Peace Treaty' with the enemy if it serves the greater interest (Maslahat) of the Muslims.
Conclusion:
When you see a Muslim country like Saudi Arabia making treaties, engaging in diplomacy, or hosting international summits with Western powers, do not be quick to make Takfir of them. They are following the Sunnah of diplomacy.
As long as they do not compromise on the Tawheed of Allah or the sanctity of the Haramain, these worldly treaties are permissible tools of statecraft.
The Prophet (peace be upon him) used diplomacy to protect the blood of Muslims, and the scholars of today are doing the same.
The Blame Game vs. Reality
France has a deep history of protesting from the 1789 Revolution to today. Taking to the streets is how French citizens demand fairness.
Recent riots and strikes aren’t caused by immigrants or muslims. They stem from real financial stress: soaring energy bills, high food prices, and stagnant wages while the rich get richer.
Additionally, France losing control over African resources has weakened its economy.
While politicians blame minority groups to distract voters, people protest for basic survival: better pay, lower expenses, and a fair government. In France, protesting is simply how working-class people fight back against corporate greed and bad policy.
⚠️🔴 À REGARDER JUSQU'À LA FIN
JE NE PEUX PAS DÉCRIRE CE QUE JE VIENS DE VIVRE À MARSEILLE.
#17octobre