Used to be @MyshkinFool but some crypto twat hacked it .. so I continue the struggle from here
Joined July 2021
- Tweets8.5K
- Following774
- Followers864
- Likes7.6K
Pinned Tweet
My washing machine:
"To open the door mid cycle would be to unleash such terrors upon the world that I must forbid it!"
My dishwasher:
"No idea, mate. Fuck it, what's the worst that could happen?"
It's also kind of mad that those who claim to want to protect our women, don't seem as keen when the offender may be white.
Someone I have been 'debating' has decided to follow me, presumably because they want to go through my tweets and find some gotcha.
Fill your boots, mate.
The pathetic level of modern journalism, that they will pick one item from a list of many and suggest a cheaper gherkin was the only outcome from the budget, rather than actually address anything that was actually proposed. How far we have fallen.
Men who would rather believe that a woman would go through a rape trial in the hope of getting a pay day in a civil case afterwards, than that a notorious womaniser would use his appeal to abuse women, can fuck right off.
Case in point:
teapaw.org/Kozcp8/status/21157930…
Two things I learned from my Brand tweet:
1. Despite some saying otherwise, there are plenty of men, on here certainly, that will gladly shit themselves publicly.
2. Quite a few men failed to read the actual tweet properly in their desperation to NotAllMen
I do think that one undiscussed side effect of the pandemic is to allow people to say and behave in absolutely mental ways and have it be unquestioned.
The main problem with a right wing government or opposition is that there is no incentive to make things better, since support relies upon finding a convenient scapegoat for any problem, be it migrants or liberals or lefties.
I am forced to conclude that the reason so often it is men who are in defence of Russell Brand, is because the nature of his crimes forces them to ask questions of themselves and of their friends, regarding their behaviours around women.
It is also notable that those that mention the investigation of historical sexual offences, where there is a lack of DNA evidence, never mention things like investigations into the church, for example, or state those shouldn't happen.
"You can critise the Witchfinder General all you like but you don't get any witch crimes any more, do you?"
22 needs to start working.
