Jackie 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 1776

President Trump is right to call out the voting machines. I created this visualization last night showing that legacy Dominion voting machines were being used almost everywhere a district went blue. Not only that, the red dots represents every time a person registered to vote without proof-of-citizenship. Do you see the overlap between the two maps?

DR is so good at analyzing data that I have zero doubts about what she says. The data that's readily available shows exactly the trends she mentions. It's a shame that people who don't have a clue about what is happening attack her instead of the real culprits. I pray that she has adequate personal protection. Part of this election is a huge propaganda and activist effort to overthrow our own government, stuff that we can see now that we have DR's Democracy Files. OTOH, there are data sources she might not be able to reach and analyze, which might tell far different stories. Three examples are: Voter rolls. Every state closely guards these and won't provide them to anyone, including the DOJ. A few months ago, Art @ZarkFiles published a series of posts about phantom records he found in several states. They follow certain creation patterns that allows them to be almost invisible, yet dynamically accessed when needed. Additionally, other election integrity researchers have found parallel record creation actions that grow the rolls in cycles as in this post: teapaw.org/theprofsrecord/status/… Another example comes from cast vote records, serial records of votes as they are cast, again difficult to acquire, which show "parallel lock step motion." They show patterns that are so regular that they defy human activity. Dig deeper with @KingSolomon006 These patterns can only occur when something is guiding the creation of votes. Among election integrity researchers, it is well known, and backed up by coders who created the mechanisms, that the machines are all interconnected, can communicate easily, and have at least a dozen different mechanisms built into their code that allow cheating that is almost undetectable, not visible in the data that DR might be able to acquire. Dig deeper with @PeterBernegger or @Joeoltmann or @RalphPezzullo or The Lone Raccoon @FSociety_1942 and and @PatriotMarkCook. See specifically Lara Logan's interview with @GaryBernsten at teapaw.org/laralogan/status/19940… The various election theft theories have been proven by the capture and analysis of a Dominion voting machine image by @realtinapeters. The routines exist inside the code found in those machines. Now, put it all together like this, as one possible scheme: 1. Pollute the rolls. (There are an unknown number of methods for doing this. illegals, phantoms, etc.) 2. Load pollbooks with those rolls. 3. Allow the pollbooks to collaborate with tabulators. 4. Tell the tabulators what margins are needed. (There are 13 known methods for doing this.) (i.e. maintain a 15% shift) 5. When legitimate voters show up, the pollbook notes it and removes them from the potential phantom voter list. 6. Gradually introduce the phantom voters to the tabulators as needed to maintain the desired outcome, all the time keeping levels below those that attract suspicion. Note that this process can work from the start of early voting until the close of election day and even through the mail ballot voting processes. 7. The phantom voters don't even need to show up. Their votes are used when the machines need them to maintain the specified results. All of these election fraud data and reports have been largely excluded by courtroom examination by a huge cartel of protection lawyers that keeps them from reaching the courts. The mischievous results use to be subtly hidden, but this time are glaringly obvious. Oh, if only DR could get her hands on some real election data... not the hazy stuff the election cartel allows to be seen. THANK HER for all she does in analyzing real data that helps expose so many of the behind-the scenes criminals.