It's a sign of how stupid and bankrupt this site is that someone who claims he doesn't hate immigrants is sane-washing an "illegal immigrants commit voter fraud and steal elections" meme from Elon for centrist clout. What an embarrassment.
Man am I surprised but also so not surprised that my home state senate district in Connecticut has it's own little bit of fascist republican election denial.
I've seen a lot of content-based arguments for preferring bluesky or X, but I would love to see an argument on the merits of the structure of each platform.
Huge downsides of X: Elon clearly puts his fingers on the algorithmic scale, and you essentially pay for engagement.
I don't think these biases exist on bluesky, and I get the impression it's much more flexible in letting you determine what you see, but I'm unaware of structural downsides.
Noah Reid retweeted
This is a plan where the state seizes control of the universities including the private ones, imposes state-approved ideology, and dictates to them that their ultimate duty is to serve the interests of the state. This is freaking me out.
Fascism, Paxton argued, was best thought of as a political behavior, one marked by “obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation or victimhood.”
nytimes.com/2024/10/23/magaz…
Noah Reid retweeted
Terrifying
#BREAKING RFK Jr. to fire 600 employees at the National Institutes of Health, "replacing them with a new cohort of workers as he seeks to dramatically reshape America’s health agencies" - ABC News
Noah Reid retweeted
We will protect free speech by controlling what universities can teach and how they teach it. Ignorance is strength.
Here's a take that's sure to be popular on here: I read the New York Times as my primary source of news and I think they did a pretty good job of covering the election. If I had only followed social media, substack pundits etc, I am 90% sure I would be materially more ignorant.
Republicans should end the senate filibuster. I thought the democrats should have when they had power. Extremist rhetoric from people who never have to actually make good on anything poisons our politics.
Before the election even began, a refusal to even pay lipservice to ethics.
I think there may have been one or two Great Men of Western Civilization who believed the ethics of small men shouldn't apply to the great. Who were those guys again?
nytimes.com/2024/11/09/us/po…
I cannot imagine the cognitive dissonance required to believe you are at the dawn of a new age of "great men" when your avatar is a shameless con-man who built a political movement on bullying and demagoguery.
Revenge of the Silent Male Voter
What I learned about Trump's landslide victory from one night in New York City.
On election day, I caught the subway from Brooklyn to Manhattan. Sitting across from me an elderly woman wore a t-shirt with the image of Trump pumping his fist in the air with the words “fight, fight.” A small "I Voted" sticker was pressed onto her lapel.
She sat with an easy confidence. There were no disapproving glances from other passengers. There was no tension. No conflict. It struck me that in 2024 it was now perfectly acceptable to express support for Trump in a deep blue (Democratically held) city. As I travelled to my destination I wondered: if one could support Trump this openly in New York City, what might support look like in the rest of the country?
A few hours later I attended an exclusive well-heeled party. I spoke to various professionals who said that they had never voted Republican in their lives, but had voted for Trump that day due to his support—in their words—“for the Jews”. These Manhattanites told me that Kamala was too sympathetic to the “pro-Hamas contingent” of the far-Left, and at a time of rising antisemitism, they couldn’t bring themselves to support her. This small group of cosmopolitans represented a contingent far-removed from the stereotypical MAGA voter. And yet listening to their views, it again occurred to me: if I could find such support for Trump in the middle of a Democratic heartland—what might it look like in the rest of the country?
When I arrived at my final stop of the evening—a private underground bar in the Lower East side of the city—a celebratory atmosphere had begun to explode. The betting markets tipped a Trump win, and online supporters of Harris started to express acceptance of defeat. The beer here had already run dry. It was so bustling that it was hard to move, with young men in their twenties and early thirties outnumbering women by 2:1. These men were diverse: white, black, Hispanic, Asian. A few wore Trump caps, but the aesthetic was more like a university dorm than a MAGA rally. “This is the counter-culture” one party goer told me. "This isn't just about Trump," another said. "It's about Vance and Musk. It's about American dynamism."
In the coming days, much will be written about working class concerns—issues that have become familiar focal points for those seeking to understand Trump’s support. But while inflation and border policies will have no doubt played a role in the Republicans’ landslide victory, we might also want to look at the sentiments expressed by young male voters—voters who represent a new and emerging contingent in American politics. Nothing about the young men I spoke to appeared particularly conservative or “right-wing”. Yet it was easy for them to explain why they voted for Trump. And if we zoom out and look at broader cultural trends, it should be easy for us to understand too.
If we take a macro perspective, we see that such young men have never known a culture in which males are not routinely described as “problematic,” “toxic,” or “oppressive”. Going to university, and working at modern companies, they live in a world of Diversity Equity and Inclusion policies—many of which promote an insidious and pervasive form of anti-male discrimination. Yet to talk about it in public invites social ostracism. To criticise DEI is to risk being called a Nazi.
These young male voters know about theories of patriarchy and white supremacy, but they have never known a culture which celebrates the Great Man Theory of history. Thomas Carlyle’s nineteenth century framework for understanding the past is seen as an anachronism, not worthy of serious thought. Today we acknowledge historical figures not for their feats, but for their crimes. Whether it is due to slavery, colonisation, racism, or sexism, we tear down the monuments of our past, while building no new heroes for our future.
The problem with this way of viewing the world is that it is alienating and self-defeating. It is also wrong. By any objective standards Elon Musk is a great man of history, who is influencing the course of human civilisation for generations to come. As one party-goer told me “he caught a fucking rocket with mechanical chopsticks.” Yet despite his achievements, Musk is more likely to be scorned than celebrated by the Democratic establishment.
This tension between achievement and resentment explains much about our current moment. The young men I met that night in Manhattan weren't just voting for policies. They were voting for a different view of history and human nature. In their world, individual greatness matters. Male ambition serves a purpose. Risk-taking and defiance create progress.
This is why the Trump victory transcends conventional political analysis. It represents more than a rebuke of border policies or inflation rates. It signals a resurrection of old truths: that civilisation advances through the actions of remarkable individuals, that male traits can build rather than destroy, and that greatness—despite our modern discomfort with the concept—remains a force in human affairs.
The elderly woman on the subway, the Manhattan professionals, and the young men at the underground bar all sensed a shift. They saw in Trump not just a candidate, but a challenge to a psychosocial orthodoxy that has dominated American institutions for a generation. Their votes marked not just a political preference, but a cultural correction.
As the final results came in that night, it became clear that what I witnessed in New York was playing out across the nation. The election wasn't just a victory for Trump. It was a victory for a way of seeing the world that many thought dead: one where individual achievement matters, where male ambition serves a purpose, and where great men still shape the course of history.
Read the full article here-->
quillette.com/2024/11/06/the…
The solution to this is in part to try to damage or destroy the right wing media ecosystem. This is purely a result of propaganda and people who believe in facts "honing their message" or whatever the fuck cannot fix this by itself.
lol at using words delivered by Anton Chigurh, a psychopathic murderer, just before he is about to kill someone, to lord it over people who didn't vote for you. I think you know this character and this scene, so you're really showing who you are here.
One of the most important skills I see in successful (and good) people is to constantly reevaluate assumptions. They make predictions based on various inputs, some of them unknown, and reevaluate based on what they got right and wrong. They trust people not because they're always right--no one is--but because if you're constantly seeking the truth it's easy to identify those who are doing the same.
If you were confident that Donald J. Trump was going to lose, maybe you should question what else you "know" about him. Maybe the people who misled you about his electoral chances have misled you about other things.
In the words of Cormac McCarthy, "If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?"
Also, did Republicans take this advice when they lost in 2018, 2020, and failed miserably to red wave in 2022? I don't think so. I think they doubled down on lies and insurrection.