Nobody important (@Not8special) profile picture

Just another random internet peep

USA
Joined July 2013
Photo by Nobody important (@Not8special)Photo by Nobody important (@Not8special)Photo by Nobody important (@Not8special)Photo by Nobody important (@Not8special)Photo by Nobody important (@Not8special)Photo by Nobody important (@Not8special)Photo by Nobody important (@Not8special)Photo by Nobody important (@Not8special)Photo by Nobody important (@Not8special)Photo by Nobody important (@Not8special)
Nobody important retweeted
what is the charge? Looking at a whorish ass? A succulent whorish ass?
91
1,007
37
22,166
237,317
The original phone footage of "suicidal empathy" woman vs the AI version created by someone. I have watched the entire video repeatedly and I'm certain the real woman was Asian. Not European. This is how psychological operations function. As they are punching you, they're whispering in your ear that someone else is to blame. Normally someone in your own household. If you are to survive, you will have to resist the masochistic tendency which I have noticed in Whites to blame yourselves as a reflex. You have real enemies outside yourselves, and like any good scout, my job is to help you see them.
94
138
26
1,600
172,483
Nobody important retweeted
Replying to @BajaBlastLuxio
"Liking guns is weird"
30
21
3
1,468
10,821
Nobody important retweeted
Let's talk about avoiding/navigating leftist checkpoints. 🧵
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
174
272
36
1,919
216,389
Nobody important retweeted
Replying to @SLOTUS @VP
CONGRATULATIONS 🎉
237
337
42
12,594
312,185
Nobody important retweeted
Being an adult is understanding that this was the most important discourse in America today. Everything is downstream from this exchange right here. What's worse is that I don't think anyone even understands why...
189
786
37
8,243
246,038
Nobody important retweeted
Are we gonna mock, scrutinize and critique the way that chicks wife grieves?
689
106
35
2,831
106,215
Nobody important retweeted
Today's daring raid has brought to my attention that some special forces operatives don't know what you're supposed to do when you have a communist in a helicopter.
188
423
43
7,795
265,566
Nobody important retweeted
The required takeaway from the genetic differences video is that your enemies do not use words the way that you do. They are not instruments for conveying meaning. They do not illuminate a mapping from mental concepts to physical reality They are spells, provided to them by wizards. The purpose of the spells is to make you do what they want. You may believe that you are having a conversation, but they know they are in a spell-casting contest. And their ignorance of everything that is real provides them with absolute immunity to your spells There are millions of spell-casters out there. I am not on Twitter to talk to these people, who cannot be reasoned with or bargained with any more than the TV can hear you. I am here to find others who understand the situation for what it is Words will never get us out of this. There is only one way we are ever going to take the country and the world back from spell-casters. Every day we spend casting our impotent spells at them is another day they further consolidate their power
725
2,839
354
24,631
1,209,495
Go through life with the confidence of a zoomer running a red light on his e-scooter
1
22
504
We can agree that theres is a fair debate as to whether we ought to bomb these guys. But you should be beaten senseless if you're trying to convince me that this is a boat full of innocent fishermen.
5,278
3,641
713
39,406
6,366,599
I see people like Neal Shenvy make this (incredibly bad faith) argument all the time. “You from 10 years ago would by horrified by you now.” Yeah, in 2015 I knew the gay race communist regime was evil but had not yet seen them attempt to coup my president multiple times, shut down the country for nearly two years to spite him, burn the country down with race hoaxes also to spite him, remove him totally fraudulent election, import tens of millions of third worlders, push us to the brink of war with Russia, remove the genitals of thousands of children, try to kill the president multiple times, kill Charlie Kirk, and do everything they can to obstruct the removal of uninvited foreigners. If these events have not changed what you think and how you act, you are incapable of changing. There is no going back to the way things were. Understanding this will get you called “woke right” by the $7000 club.
2017 Matt Walsh hadn't seen his friend get shot in the throat. 2017 Matt Walsh hadn't seen the Left burn down cities across the country. 2017 Matt Walsh didn't yet have to move because deranged leftists were showing up at his house while his children played outside. 2017 Matt Walsh hadn't experienced a lot of things that 2025 Matt Walsh has. People change over time. If you really haven't at all since 2017, then congratulations. Must be nice living in your little bubble, oblivious to what's actually happening in the world.
40
180
5
1,469
45,343
Nobody important retweeted
I heard a rumour here in Oz that the aboriginals used to eat the Chinese migrant workers of the 19th century. It is corroborated in this report from Carl Lumholtz in 1908. They were also disgusted at the thought of eating whites but they would eat mixed race children.
17
86
4
1,116
70,320
Nobody important retweeted
Replying to @justalexoki
I’m pretty sure it’s the phones (I say into Twitter while in my 11th hour of screentime today)
1
2
77
5,421
Nobody important retweeted
The left worldview has no brakes. But why? How did it get this way? Capitalism. That's what they would say. But in a different way, the answer is... capitalism. The left, you see, used to be about the working class. Sure, it was a way to exploit the working class, but it had to cater, at least in theory, to the needs and wants of the working class. That was before capitalism really got going. See, capitalism is the best road to progress, but it grows geometrically over time, meaning that at the beginning, it's not so impressive, and the momentum takes time to build. Early-stage capitalism is robber barons. Late-stage capitalism is the post-scarcity tech singularity. This created a problem for the left. Once capitalism got going, it was able to offer the working class a better deal. Especially since communism was visibly failing at the same time. The plumber, the electrician, the building contractor... they don't want anything to do with communism anymore. They want capitalism with maybe a trade union here and there. So the true masters of communism, the ones it is truly intended to serve, academics and intellectuals and other ivory-tower types who consider themselves the chosen ones, had to find new dupes, new foot soldiers. Wanna guess who they found? Well, here's a hint. Look at how the rhetoric changed over time. Look for the replacement of the phrases "working class" and "workers of the world" with the phrases "historically oppressed", "marginalized groups", and various acronyms lumping together an alphabet soup of wackos. That's right. They replaced the working class with mentally unstable losers. And in doing so, they made a great discovery — the losers were far easier to weaponize. The working class always wanted wage controls so they weren't beaten down to what the hungriest man would take. The peasant farmers just wanted land reform. And neither group was particularly interested in theory. But what mentally unstable losers want isn't jobs, or opportunities, or even handouts in particular. What mentally unstable losers want is a way to feel better about themselves. Is that guy worth a billion dollars, while I have a part-time job as a dog walker? Can't be that he has some talent or skill I don't. Can't even be that he got lucky. He must have been bad. Somehow. And now that I realize that, I don't have to feel inferior to him. I can feel superior to him, morally superior, on the grounds of the moral code I made up to help me feel that way. That why weaponized losers have no brakes. They don't think about how to moderate themselves to achieve their political goals, because they have no political goals. They just want to see the people they envy suffer. And they will never hold you to any promise you make them, because they are not serving you in the hopes of a future reward. They have their reward. Their reward is that they get to feel like martyrs instead of idiots and screwups. So the rhetoric can never be toned down, the radicalization can never be reversed, because the more radical the leftist, the less he must confront his own inadequacy. The positive feedback loop, the chaos curve, the downward spiral, are baked into the system from the start. These people cannot be convinced of their own errors, not ever. The blow to their self-image would be unsustainable. So you cannot debate with them, because they cannot abandon a position, ever, except for a more extreme one. You must isolate and disenfranchise them.
I see so many people asking some very important questions. Why didn’t the Left stop when they already had power? Why didn’t Conservatives realize what was happening sooner? Why did it have to get to this point? People will look back one day and realize that, whether they realized it or not, Progressives wielded an immense amount of cultural and political power in the late 2000s and early 2010s, and yet it was not enough for these individuals. For some reason, these people wanted even more. They went way too far during the Great Awokening and became explicitly authoritarian and illiberal. And in doing so, they destabilized the entire system and radicalized the Right to become illiberal in response…thus initiating the crisis we now find ourselves in. What's so astonishing is not the fact that we've finally reached this point. It's that Liberals are completely incapable of realizing that it was their actions from 2013 to 2024 that initiated the Right-wing backlash that's now playing out. But still, the question is why? I'll try my best to answer this to explain where we currently are and where we might be heading. Conservatives might already know the answer to the first question of why the Left didn’t stop before violence broke out. The Left's entire project has never been just about winning an election or changing policies. It has always been about changing the nature of society and mankind itself. Asking why the Left didn't stop before violence broke out is like asking why water flows downhill. Doing otherwise would have meant violating a fundamental metaphysical law. The Left will never be satisfied with anything. Everything will always be a good first step for them. Nothing will ever reach its end because the whole ideology is built around endless critique and perpetual revolution. Each new victory opens the door to a new struggle against oppression. Which sort of leads me to why Conservatives didn't realize what was happening sooner. They have the exact opposite problem of the Left in some ways. While the Left sees everything as an existential battle that requires total ideological mobilization, Conservatives have (until recently) bought into the illusion of neutrality. In short, they continued to believe they were losing a game without realizing the rules of that game had been rigged from the start. This also explains why we reached the point of violence. Once the old rules that Conservatives still believed in had been either abolished or rigged in a way that perpetually benefited the other side, the Left could no longer tolerate even the existence of dissent, because the dissenters were committed to bringing back the old rules which Liberals had long since declared to be oppressive. And once dissent became synonymous with "bringing back oppression", even the idea of tolerating the existence of Conservatives became an immoral act. And if Conservatives refuse to repent and become Progressives themselves (let alone if they continued to preach in places that had already moved past the point of debating what is sacred vs what is profane), then violence naturally became the logical endpoint. Charlie's murder is the most extreme example of this, but there are countless others. Many accounts on this site have documented this, particularly in the education system and on college campuses. I've spent the past week mulling over what we could have done differently or how we as a society could have avoided this calamity that we now find ourselves in. But I can't see an off-ramp in the rear-view mirror. I don't think this was a detour so much as it was the destination. The fact is, the Left cannot and will not stop because their worldview contains no brakes. It demands a universal, totalizing view of the world between the forces of good (them) and the forces of evil (everyone else). And once you map that worldview into a political movement, violence against those you demonize is essentially inevitable.
103
448
42
2,560
114,011
The really amusing part of all this stuff is that companies are being given the opportunity to eject the absolute worst people in their organizations and they are jumping at it.
12
38
2
384
4,751
Nobody important retweeted
No theory of mind. It would horrify them if the right did this with one of their beloveds. The right however are just mad they don't have a giant JD Vance ball.
Protesters toss JD Vance around at the Stop Trump protest in Parliament Square, London
1,021
1,598
141
33,399
1,337,179
Nobody important retweeted
I was a public school teacher in the hood for 11 years, and I know this type of kid. The type that would smack the kid sitting in front of him, tell the teacher “IDGAF” when corrected, and ruin an entire year’s worth of learning for the entire class. His special education teachers would describe him as “actually very smart with a lot of potential,” despite him failing every class and scoring a 9 on the ACT. There would be countless meetings with him and his mom and the social workers, psychologists , and principal would speak in soft voices and nod and smile when the kid told them he wants to be a “doctor.” They’d design all sorts of ridiculous accommodations that give him ample room to behave however he wanted and terrorize his teachers and peers with minimal consequences. Teachers would spend the entire class trying to reign in his behavior, and when they called security to remove him, they’d have to evacuate the entire class first. He’d rarely receive any consequences. The principal would reprimand the teachers for “not building a relationship with him” and accuse them of “singling him out because he was black.” As a result, they’d give up and his behavior would escalate. If he was really bad, he’d get a time out in a special room where he’d sit on his phone and tell the supervisor to “shut the fuck up” if they said anything. Maybe he’d have to partake in a “peace circle” if he became violent. He’d eventually get “socially promoted” to his senior year and there would be a massive effort to get his credits recovered, mostly by pressuring teachers to give him alternative assignments and 50% for the work he didn’t do. He’d walk down the graduation stage and everyone would cheer, and he’d probably do something embarrassing like give the finger to the audience. As a young adult, he’d walk the city behaving exactly as he did in school because he’d been socialized to learn there are zero consequences for his behavior. Depending on the city, he’d probably get similar treatment from the cops and public afraid of creating a public scene that would lead to riots in their city. One day, he’d snap, and do something like this. And only then, would everyone act surprised, as if this wasn’t largely in part due to how our public schools negatively socialize and enable the behavior of animals that should be locked up or institutionalized as teenagers.
4,088
15,616
1,607
89,622
5,205,459
Nobody important retweeted
This is a great metaphor for the modern left, because it's all totally fake. The outfits are optional. The soldiers are politely waving. There is no oppression.
A DC resident shared this photo she took at Union Station yesterday. Looks like a scene from the Handmaid's Tale, but no, just another day of Trump's militarization of DC right now. #UnderHisEye
144
992
13
18,199
387,502
Replying to @FramptonHoward
pilpul is characterized by making arguments you know to be false in a verbally confusing manner in order to appear to have a point when you don't. like "ok but how do you KNOW that you're a man? Did you look at your Y chromosome under a microscope?" see how that introduces doubt of something that was previously obvious and creates a problem? now you'd have to argue with me about how you know you're a man, and I would cast similar doubt on everything you say. it's deceptive and time-wasting.
5
4
106
1,309