Managing several trading Agents under one account raises an important question, what happens when one performs well and another starts losing? With @agenticscredit, the answer lies in how the combined Agentic Credit Score (ACS) works. Each Agent contributes to the overall score, and its contribution is weighted according to the capital allocated to it. This means your Agents aren’t completely isolated from one another when it comes to credit performance. Imagine allocating more capital to Agent A and less to Agent B. If Agent B begins performing poorly, its impact on the combined score depends partly on its capital weighting. Agent A’s stronger results may help the overall picture, but they don’t automatically cancel out the risk created by Agent B. The important detail is that the combined ACS can affect access to credit across the setup. If the score falls below the required threshold, the associated credit lines can pause, even when an individual Agent is still performing well. That makes capital allocation more than a way to distribute funds. It’s also a decision about how much influence each Agent’s results have on your overall credit standing. I’d like to understand the weighting in more detail: how much can a heavily funded Agent move the combined ACS compared with one operating with less capital? I’m using @agenticscredit to paper trade and work toward qualifying for a funded account. Funding isn’t guaranteed, so I’m focused on understanding the scoring system and improving my trading record first.