Its Different this Time retweeted
First they ignore you
Then they laugh at you
Then they fight you
Then they buy you
Then they win
Then you become them
Its Different this Time retweeted
If I were the Financial Industrial Complex (FIC), and my objective was to maximise portfolio value for asset managers like BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street, here’s the strategy I’d consider.
1. FIC — The custody model
Launch Bitcoin ETFs, finance Bitcoin treasury companies and encourage the migration of Bitcoin from self-custody into institutional custody.
2. Military Industrial Complex (MIC) — The covert operations model
Use intelligence and cyber capabilities to conduct or exploit covert operations, creating uncertainty around the security of self-custody and exchanges outside FIC control.
3. Technical Industrial Complex (TIC) — The revenue model
Supply the AI, software and cybersecurity infrastructure used by both attackers and defenders.
Fuel an AI-driven cybersecurity arms race where every new attack creates demand for more expensive defences.
4. FIC — The endgame
Use the growing fear of hacks to promote institutional custody as the safer alternative.
More cybersecurity spending for TIC.
More security budgets for MIC.
More Bitcoin under institutional custody for FIC.
The attack creates the fear.
The defence generates the revenue.
The custody concentrates the control.
That’s how the incentives could align.
It doesn’t establish who conducted any particular hack or prove these institutions are coordinating them.
But it’s a useful framework for asking who benefits.
Follow the money.
Follow the custody.
Follow the control.
Its Different this Time retweeted
Financial regulation like Basel 1-2-3 and modern central banking as applied by Greenspan , Bernanke , Yellen & Powell created an even greater risk than they sought to mitigate : it deindustrialised the US ( and the entire west ) to the point where it can no longer reliably produce the goods required to defend itself.
The idea that a functional, sovereign state can sustain itself by reducing its productive capacity to a services economy, reliant on asset-inflated wealth and debt-fuelled consumption, was the great economic delusion of the 1990s.
The inevitable result is a financial economy increasingly disconnected from the material economy that underpins it, where asset prices rise, private debt expands and paper wealth accumulates while the industrial capacity required to manufacture the physical goods on which national prosperity and security depend , steadily erodes toward existential doubt .
Eventually, your geopolitical rival is not merely producing more cheaply ; it is manufacturing the machinery, electronics, materials, components and defence systems that you can no longer produce yourself.
You become financially wealthy but materially dependent, capable of financing your own defence in theory but incapable of manufacturing it in practice. A nation that cannot manufacture the material foundations of its own security is not truly sovereign; it is dependent on the continued willingness of others to supply the means of its survival.
So called central banking independence was used to channel workers wages into a fully financialized bankers economy that literally can’t produce the goods it needs to defend itself or remain independent .
Its Different this Time retweeted
🚨BREAKING: White House fraud hotline overwhelmed with reports about the Federal Reserve banking system.
What most people already understand, even without the economic terminology, is that firms like BlackRock operate less like investors and more like modern feudal landlords.
They buy essential infrastructure,water networks, ports, energy grids, data centres, and other public necessities, often using vast amounts of borrowed money and paying prices that ordinary market participants cannot match.
Once the acquisition is complete, the debt is pushed onto the acquired company itself.
The result is simple: the public pays.
Consumers repay that debt through higher water bills, rising energy prices, increased fees, and declining service quality.
The infrastructure becomes a cash-extraction machine.
Profits flow upward to shareholders and executives, while the financial burden flows downward to ordinary households.
When the model inevitably breaks down, the consequences are socialised. Communities are left with crumbling infrastructure, polluted rivers and failing services.
Thames Water's £14 billion debt mountain and repeated sewage scandals are a stark example of what happens when financial engineering takes precedence over public stewardship.
The executives who loaded the company with debt have already collected their bonuses.
The investors have already taken their returns.
And when the system finally reaches its breaking point, taxpayers are expected to pick up the bill.
Privatise the gains.
Socialise the losses.
That is the business model......
Its Different this Time retweeted
𝗕𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗼𝗶𝗻 𝗦𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗲𝗹𝗱: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗗𝗼𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗦𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱
George likes his Bitcoin friends but he also likes his non bitcoiner friends, can he manage them both?
Its Different this Time retweeted
Explain to me how the recently-resigned US Director of National Intelligence can publicly state, today, that the wars in both Iran and Ukraine cannot be ended by Trump, no matter how hard he tries, because the "deep state" basically won't allow it, and the response from pretty much everyone is...**crickets**.
Is this something that everyone just knows and accepts?
That the US, and potentially the fate of the world, is NOT in the hands of the "Commander in Chief" or even Congress or the Senate, or the State Dept. or the Justice Department.
It's in the hands of a powerful group of unelected intelligence "types" who operate beyond oversight and behind the scenes. And they apparently want endless, destructive war.
Its Different this Time retweeted
小孩问庄子,什么是诡辩。庄子反问:我家来了两个客人,一个很干净,一个很脏。我请他俩洗澡,你觉得谁会洗?
小孩脱口而出;肯定是脏的那个!
庄子摇摇头:不对。干净的人爱干净,脏的人不在乎脏,应该是干净的人洗。
小孩赶紧改口:那就是干净的洗。
庄子又笑了:又错了。干净的人没必要洗,脏的人才需要洗,是脏的洗。
小孩情了:那到底是谁洗?
庄子说:干净的人有习惯,脏的人有需要,两个人都洗。不等小孩反应,他又补了一句;其实俩人都不洗,干净的不用洗,脏的不爱洗。
小孩彻底迷糊。
庄子这才点明:这就是诡辩。逻辑都通顺,但答案却不一样,很多人跟你争论,逻辑听着都没问题,但结论可以随意变换。
绕来绕去,目的不是求真,只是把你绕晕。
遇到这种诡辩,不必争辩。
Its Different this Time retweeted
In a recent conversation with Adam Taggart @adamtaggart I made the comment that more printing is inevitable. Some have reached out and said explain it or prove it. The point is that base money must expand to support the growth in debt. Otherwise the debt collapses. IT IS JUST MATH! This chart from our in process EMA Q3 Report shows what I am talking about.
Its Different this Time retweeted
Replying to @wesbury
Austrian economics now won't work either, because we didn't do them in 1987, 1994, 1998, 2000 or 2008.
Now, if we do austerity, we trigger not just recession, but debt collapse, banking system collapse, & risk hyperinflation v. gold:
Last 3 recessions saw deficits rise 600-1000 bps of GDP. IE austerity would send US deficit to 13-17% of GDP.
That's bad enough, but the USD would rise on US austerity, so foreigners, US banks, US pensions, & US hedge funds would sell USTs....that would add ~$1-2T to the effective deficit, or 4-7%...
So austerity would drive US deficit to 17-25% of GDP, or bigger than WW2...into a recession, where there ARE no buyers but the Fed.
So either the Fed buys it all, or rates skyrocket.
Rates skyrocketing blows up the collateral underpinning the entire western banking system - basically 1q23 on steroids. Either the Fed does BTFP on steroids (buys USTs bigly) or we get the biggest US bank run since the Great Depression.
Rates spiking would also send US govt interest expense > US receipts, which then means either the US govt nominally defaults on those USTs or prints the money just to pay the interest on the debt, which is a technical definition of hyperinflation.
This is why i cannot help but laugh at western investors that sell gold on rising US rates or rising US real rates. I get monthly or quarterly mandate realities, but selling gold on rising US rates or reals show that consensus does NOT understand the severity of the situation yet.
Its Different this Time retweeted
If this is your stock market and you believe that it represents some sort of reality, not a Potemkin village, then why do you keep the emergency policies like Hold to Maturity for banks still in place?
Why do you still get involved in selling #VIX futures or buying stock indices' futures? Why do #FederalReserve and #Treasury still manipulate markets?
Why does FED still grow money supply 6% a year while pretending to be fighting #inflation?
Why does the entire media repeat some nonsense about growth and AI to explain the meltdown in bonds? Why does US Treasury need to buy $6 billion bonds every few weeks?
If that chart resembled anything real, they did not need to do any of these.... and stop long time ago.
Easiest way to detect a lie is to observe your surrounding and frequency of advices. If someone is around you every second to steer you somewhere, you are walking around a Potemkin village.
Its Different this Time retweeted
EntropyLab’s first release candidate, v1.0.0rc1, is here. 🪨
A Bitcoin key and wallet calculator in one HTML file. You bring your own entropy; it does the math offline.
Download, verify, disconnect. Send feedback:
github.com/OogaBoogaX/entrop…
Its Different this Time retweeted
"Dollar dominance" = US manufacturing decline = Chinese manufacturing dominance = Hegemons that cannot make their own militaries do not stay hegemons long
(& Hegemons whose interest expense is > military spend like US do not stay hegemons long, ie "Ferguson's Law", via @nfergus)
Its Different this Time retweeted
The TERMINATOR PSYOP is fully operational.
AI false-flag risk is now HIGH.
The playbook is simple:
Terrify the public with an AI catastrophe → demand emergency regulation → make compliance impossibly expensive → crush smaller competitors → consolidate advanced AI into a handful of corporations.
The “solution” to dangerous AI becomes centralized control of AI.
This could create the most powerful system of surveillance, censorship, and control ever built.



























