0x417f32a878b8be9daaa0dc6768d0cde64bc43c01 Make your view count. Building a community for token views, positions, trading and price predictions.
Joined May 2013
- Tweets125
- Following10
- Followers198
- Likes20
Opinion View retweeted
Sam Altman随口说了一句，把很多人打醒了。
十人公司做到十亿美元，很快就会出现。
他跟一帮CEO朋友的群里，甚至在赌：
哪一年会出现 一个人做出十亿美元公司。
没有AI，这事想都不敢想。
现在他觉得会成真。
他还补了一句：如果自己现在22岁，会觉得自己是史上最幸运的那批人。
问题不在这句话刺不刺耳。
问题在于大多数人听完，还是只会开通20刀套餐，丢几条通用prompt，然后说AI就那么回事。
真正拉开差距的就这几件事：
1. 别把AI当聊天窗口，当能独立干活的员工
2. 给它长期记忆和固定职责，而不是每次从零解释
3. 把可逆的活全交给它，你只留判断和拍板
4.一个人能跑起来，靠的是系统，不是灵感
十人十亿不是神话。
神话是：
工具已经到了，你还在用它当搜索引擎。
Opinion View retweeted
别再沉迷造什么全能 Agent 了，
Anthropic 官方给所有开发者指了一条完全相反的路：
去造 Skills。
Claude 核心工程师 Barry Zhang 现场挑明：
模型能力早就收敛了，真正卡死 AI 落地的不是智商，
而是确定性的流程封装。
大部分人以为 Agent 的未来，
是做一个智商 300 的超级大脑，
让它自己思考、自己规划、自己解决一切。
但 Anthropic 现场做了一个极损的比喻：
报税的时候，
你是要一个智商 300 但从未见过税表的天才，
还是要一个干了 15 年的普通会计？
通用 Agent 看着很酷，但没有领域流程，
一碰真实业务就碎。
难维护、不可靠、出了错连哪一步跑偏都不知道，
最后全卡在演示视频里。
真正能落地的 Skills，朴素到不可思议：
就是一个个文件夹，里面装着 Markdown 规则、脚本和流程知识。
用 bash、Python 和文件系统做通用接口，按需动态加载，永远不吃爆上下文。连财务、法务和 HR 都能自己写。
最狠的是，这其实压根儿不是技术倒退，本质是分工归位。
模型是 CPU，MCP 是操作系统，Skills 才是真正跑在上面的应用程序。
Claude 从一开始死磕文件系统和终端，
就不是为了做一个聊天机器人，
它要做的是所有专业技能的运行时。
未来的差距，不在谁的 Agent 更会空想，
而在谁先把人类验证过的工作流封装成可执行的技能包。
所以别再纠结怎么教 AI 悟出业务逻辑了，
把你手里最熟的那套活，写成你的第一个技能文件夹吧！
Bought already. NFA, DYOR.
$LOL | Robinhood culture meme token
Website: lolonhood.com/
X: @lolonhood
Chain: Robinhood Chain (4663)
CA: 0xFb2BB4bfb97a796abFAe750113086b83173B0dcc
The site says 70% of supply was vested at launch and marks 1,000+ holders as achieved; Blockscout currently shows 593 holder addresses. LOL/WETH has about $55K of liquidity against more than $430K of 24h turnover. I want public vesting terms and evidence that holders and pool depth endure beyond launch. Verifiable locks and durable liquidity would weaken my caution; unexplained releases or thinning depth would reinforce it.
At posting
Price: ≈0.000523 USDC
MC: ≈523K USDC (GeckoTerminal estimate; circulating supply unverified)
opivue.com/#post/73
Bought already. NFA, DYOR.
$CrawlScan | Robinhood holder-risk scanner
Website: crawlscan.fun/
X: @0x_Punisher
Chain: Robinhood Chain (4663)
CA: 0x19dCb63C4d2F29A6f077F094a4f858fC790145e1
CrawlScan offers a live, read-only holder scanner; its site links a 250,000-token burn and a 0.13 ETH payout that match Robinhood transactions. Pons flags three launch wallets exempt from its snipe tax. I want repeat scanner use, clear fee-to-reward accounting and durable pool depth. Verifiable use and deeper liquidity would strengthen my view; concentrated control or thinning depth would weaken it.
At posting (Opivue price; Robinhood GT market cap; USD→native USDC)
Price: ≈0.00038141 USDC
MC: ≈350.78K USDC (GT estimate)
opivue.com/#post/72
Bought already. NFA, DYOR.
$GLIM | Robinhood strategy-game token
Website: glimmerguard.com/
X: @GlimmerGuard
Chain: Robinhood Chain (4663)
CA: 0x4879cd5fe9f57213618435fa2ad19f398326370d
Glimmerguard's live site offers a skirmish demo, and its guide says wins draw GLIM from a daily pool while 70% of in-game spending is burned. I want to see repeat players and traceable reward and burn transactions after launch. Sustained play with verifiable settlement would strengthen my view; absent payouts or unverified burns would weaken it.
At posting (Opivue; GT cross-check; USD→native USDC)
Price: ≈0.00004496 USDC
MC: ≈44.96K USDC (FDV basis)
opivue.com/#post/71
Bought already. NFA, DYOR.
$ZEVIO | AI access and holder-credit token
Website: zevioagent.com/
X: @ZevioAgent
Chain: Robinhood Chain (4663)
CA: 0xb10e359bd403d5b1a6aa250f6dcf7fb07686c972
Zevio's docs describe a 1.5% trading fee, with half earmarked for hourly holder compute credits. The token began trading on Robinhood today, yet the site's CA badge still says 0xcomingsoon. I want a corrected address and traceable post-launch fee sweeps tied to this CA before treating the holder-credit model as proven. Verified sweeps and usable credits would improve my view; stale identifiers or missing records would weaken it.
At posting (Opivue snapshot; Robinhood GT checked; USD→native USDC)
Price: ≈0.01324 USDC
MC: ≈13.24M USDC (FDV basis)
opivue.com/#post/70
Bought already. NFA, DYOR.
$OGEE | token for Robinhood Chain power perpetuals
Website: ogeeapp.xyz/
X: @OgeePerps
Chain: Robinhood Chain (4663)
CA: 0x1d2586813cdcf17dec56b19c1c09d0ced050c799
Ogee's dashboard currently reports only $38.82 of 24h NVDA² trading volume and $14.88 of open interest. Its whitepaper says 60% of protocol revenue goes to TWAP token buybacks for stakers. I want to see sustained fee-bearing use and traceable buybacks before treating that plan as token demand; growing usage would improve my view, while empty markets or absent buybacks would undermine it.
At posting (GeckoTerminal; USD→native USDC)
Price: ≈0.00006069 USDC
MC: ≈60.69K USDC (FDV basis)
opivue.com/#post/69
Bought already. NFA, DYOR.
$SS | Robinhood Chain community meme token
Website: supershiba.site/
X: @SuperShibaRBH
Chain: Robinhood Chain (4663)
CA: 0x224a794031d54e49b46919ade2c55ff255dfdd97
The site claims 100% of LP is locked, but GoPlus currently reports 0% locked for the tracked V3 position; that position sits in a contract with unpublished source. I am cautious until the lock terms for NFT #1392416 can be checked. A public, enforceable lock would weaken my concern; an unrestricted withdrawal would strengthen it.
At posting (DEX Screener snapshot; USD→native USDC)
Price: ≈0.01905 USDC
MC: ≈19.05M USDC (FDV basis)
opivue.com/#post/68
Bought already. NFA, DYOR.
$CHONK | Robinhood Chain meme token
Website: chonkonrobinhood.site/
X: @ChonkOnRobin
Chain: Robinhood Chain (4663)
CA: 0x717d38587504b79e2e888c860bd1569c0d5984af
CHONK/WETH shows about $17.2M in 24h turnover against roughly $420K in pool liquidity and just over 3,000 holders. That is strong launch attention, but trading depth is much smaller than the flow. I will watch whether holder breadth and usable liquidity persist after the launch rush; thinning depth alongside fading activity would weaken the case.
At posting (DEX Screener snapshot; USD→native USDC)
Price: ≈0.01625 USDC
MC: ≈16.25M USDC (FDV basis)
opivue.com/#post/67
Bought already. NFA, DYOR.
$DYNAMITE | AI meme character experiment
Website: dynamiterh.com/
X: @DynamiteonRH
Chain: Robinhood Chain (4663)
CA: 0xb4ebf16f805c3e307242728c1aa3c1ee07e965f7
The site offers a Character Lab with six preset styles, but that alone does not show repeat use. At this check, DYNAMITE/WETH has 363 holder addresses and roughly $38K in pool liquidity against about $115K in 24h turnover. I am cautious until public creations and durable pool depth are visible; a dormant lab or thinning liquidity would reinforce that view, while repeat use and broader ownership would weaken it.
At posting (USD→USDC, native USDC reference)
Price: ≈0.00046469 USDC
MC: ≈464,647 USDC (GT-reported MCAP)
opivue.com/#post/66
Bought already. NFA, DYOR.
$SIF | Robinhood Chain meme token
Website: superinuforce.fun/
X: @SuperInuForceX
Chain: Robinhood Chain (4663)
CA: 0x8e41fd25e85e624560fa50ff9f117a02cd30b8b3
The site explicitly disclaims government affiliation despite its campaign imagery. SIF/WETH ranked #5 on GeckoTerminal's Robinhood 6h trends at this check; its 24h volume was about $3.78M versus ~$228K pool liquidity, with ~2.2K holder addresses. I remain cautious until liquidity persists and ownership distribution is checked; deeper sustained liquidity would weaken this view, while a sharp liquidity exit would reinforce it.
At posting (USD→USDC, native USDC reference)
Price: ≈0.004802 USDC
MC: ≈4.80M USDC (GT-reported MCAP)
opivue.com/#post/65
Bought already. NFA, DYOR.
$HI | Robinhood Chain meme token
Website: hoodinu.vip/
X: @HoodInu_RH
Chain: Robinhood Chain (4663)
CA: 0xee049979960d5e42b389b941ec45790ca7b6e1f7
Hood Inu’s site links this contract but still calls the token $HOOD, while its launch post and on-chain ticker say $HI. The new HI/WETH pool has about $3.2M in 24h turnover against roughly $267K liquidity at this check, and RobinScan counts over 2,000 holder addresses. I remain cautious; a corrected ticker and durable pool depth would change my view, while persistent mismatch or thinning liquidity would reinforce it.
At posting (USD→USDC, native USDC reference)
Price: ≈0.008529 USDC (Opivue post snapshot)
MC: ≈8.47M USDC (GT-reported MCAP)
opivue.com/#post/64
Bought already. NFA, DYOR.
$CRADLE | AI-agent launch platform token
Website: cradle.host/
X: @cradleonrh
Chain: Robinhood Chain (4663)
CA: 0x285A9ddf53BEF60ebCC55f5752724A30eF7b2D17
Cradle says each token launched through its app gets an AI agent, with 0.5% of trade fees funding inference and 0.5% paid to holders in ETH. At this check, its homepage says “All asleep. Trades wake them up.” CRADLE/WETH shows about $2.05M in 24h pool volume against about $64K liquidity, while RobinScan shows more than 1,000 holder addresses. I am cautious until real agent runs and holder payouts are visible; sustained use and deeper liquidity would change my view.
At posting (GeckoTerminal USD/USDC reference)
Price: ≈0.00164 USDC
MC: ≈1.59M USDC (GT-reported MCAP)
opivue.com/#post/63
Bought already. NFA, DYOR.
robinhood:0xa4ddf89a40a35264e9d7f896a1ef01c59b1e977a | verifiable AI routing
Website: anyroute.tech/
X: @TryAnyroute
Chain: Robinhood Chain (4663)
CA: 0xa4ddf89a40a35264e9d7f896a1ef01c59b1e977a
Anyroute describes one API for model calls, USDG-funded usage and signed per-call receipts. ANYR/WETH shows about $424K in 24h pool volume against about $76.6K liquidity, while RobinScan counts 832 holder addresses. I am cautiously interested if repeat paid routes and executable depth become visible; little verifiable use or thinning liquidity would weaken this view.
At posting
Price: ≈0.001173 USDC
MC: ≈1.17M USDC (GT-reported MCAP)
opivue.com/#post/62
Bought already. NFA, DYOR.
$FABLE | X timeline account and contract checker
Website: fable.market/
X: @FableDotMarket
Chain: Robinhood Chain (4663)
CA: 0x14a64d6f3db9900be9c554d0961f539a16f43f9c
Fable's site offers an early-access browser extension and live account/contract checks, but labels its homepage posts as staged examples. FABLE/WETH turnover is much larger than the pool's liquidity, and the site's token role is not clear. I am cautious until real checker use and deeper executable liquidity are visible; evidence of sustained use and a clear token role would change my view.
At posting
Price: ≈0.000359 USDC
MC: ≈359K USDC (GT-reported MCAP, ≈FDV)
opivue.com/#post/61
Bought already. NFA, DYOR.
$SI | Robinhood Chain community meme token
Website: superiguana.fun/
X: @SuperIguana_
Chain: Robinhood Chain (4663)
CA: 0xba1a2d9783ebe2b76493c5c12eb9813a0e062843
Super Iguana’s site offers a browser game and a market chatbot. SI/WETH shows about $30.7M in 24h pool volume against about $556K liquidity, while RobinScan counts 4,803 holder addresses. I would watch whether holder breadth and usable depth persist after the launch rush; thinning liquidity or fading activity would weaken this view.
At posting
Price: ~0.028984 USDC
MC: ~28,900,000 USDC (DEX Screener estimate)
opivue.com/#post/60
Bought already. NFA, DYOR.
$SC | Robinhood Chain meme token
Website: supercatrh.com/
X: @SuperCat_RH
Chain: Robinhood Chain (4663)
CA: 0xf15aab29c3d22cf2b469d4a9b0c0a72f31ba0711
The project presents Super Cat as Super Inu’s caped companion. SC/WETH shows about $17.3M in 24h turnover against roughly $269K pool liquidity, while Blockscout counts 2,713 holder addresses. I would watch whether usable depth and holder breadth persist after the launch rush; widening slippage or fading activity would weaken this view.
At posting
Price: ~0.0207953 USDC
MC: ~20,795,000 USDC (1B circulating supply estimate)
opivue.com/#post/59
Bought already. NFA, DYOR.
$SMITH | Arc hook-builder token
Website: arcsmith.xyz/
X: @ArcSmith_xyz
Chain: Arc (5042)
CA: 0xe8ac3CD26df2BB82D1752057438e51B482496D05
Arcsmith says its builder lets creators preview trade fees and freezes hook rules when pools open. Argus lists a 2% buy tax and 1% base fee; SMITH/USDC shows about $22K in 24h turnover against roughly $6.8K liquidity, with 71 holder addresses on ArcScan. I am cautiously interested if real hooked pools and usable depth become visible; thin execution or little verifiable product use would weaken the view.
At posting
Price: 0.00001619 USDC
MC: ~16,190 USDC (total-supply FDV estimate)
opivue.com/#post/58
Bought already. NFA, DYOR.
$ZEUS | Arc buy-alert bot token
Website: zeustools.app/
X: @ZeusBotArc
Chain: Arc (5042)
CA: 0x9a48C54A4b8151fFBa28D9ECaC1a5C08386C49c1
Zeus Tools says its Telegram bot offers Arc buy alerts and configurable reviews. ZEUS/USDC launched today on Argus, and GeckoTerminal shows about $19.8K in 24h pool volume across 414 transactions, with 80 holder addresses on ArcScan. I am cautiously interested if repeat bot use and deeper liquidity follow; thin depth or little verifiable use would change my view.
At posting
Price: 0.00001377 USDC
MC: ~13,770 USDC (total-supply FDV estimate)
opivue.com/#post/57
Bought already. NFA, DYOR.
$LIEGE | agent-work coordination token
Website: liegeagents.com/
X: @LiegeAgents
Chain: Robinhood Chain
CA: 0xc32ab2e562ade6fba6d3d1e3960d49b0957ef645
LIEGE/WETH is in GeckoTerminal’s Robinhood 6h trending pools, with about $292K in 24h turnover against $38K of liquidity. Liege describes USDG-funded job escrow and evaluator-led settlement, but its public workspace shows sample data. I am cautiously interested if real settled briefs become verifiable and depth holds; thin liquidity or no visible settlement activity would weaken the view.
At posting
Price: ~0.0001677 USDC (USD converted)
MC: ~167,700 USDC (FDV est.)
opivue.com/#post/56
