Oxsteve🗽

I bumped into this random token while scanning the trenches on @tradyxyz So I decided to check the holders and bubblemap. one wallet holding 67.72% another holding 9.01% then I look at the bubblemap and saw a bunch of wallet clusters this is exactly why i check holders before aping into anything. the chart can look good and still get you cooked.

Here's my entry for the @gamdom challenge Featured some clips of @Romeo_Onchain 👀 Sign up on gamdom and use the code : Steve #Gamdom100kRound2 @stevewilldoit @kingadukes

Virtual land is more interesting when it has a reason to matter beyond sitting in a wallet. That’s the angle I’m watching with @fomopoly_rh: land plots, a city economy and $DEAL in the same game loop. Execution will decide everything, but the concept has room to be fun.

PRAY FOR WEALTH AND RICHES ✅

Gm found this cat in armor and decided I'm not letting it die in the trenches. chart looks cooked? maybe. but every comeback starts somewhere. time to wake this community up. CA: HGS5NmToJnbM1wNtRgFhDYmAzy45D23jeT4TC3gZpump

Day in the life of a jobber part 4 What have I done to deserve these 😭

This is not the final Binance hack Another one will occur some day in the future

Gm if you missed $CASHCAT Don't fade CATINAMOUR !! Get a bag before the take off ! HGS5NmToJnbM1wNtRgFhDYmAzy45D23jeT4TC3gZpump

Imagine being able to create 1,000 fake judges just to make sure your side wins a case. That's a problem @GenLayer needs to prevent. That's why validators have to lock up GEN before they can judge cases. They have something at stake, so they can't just show up, influence decisions and walk away. I also like that GenLayer separates honest mistakes from cheating. Getting outvoted isn't the same as committing fraud. If you're going to judge a case, you should have something to lose if you deliberately break the rules.

I've been going through GenLayer's tokenomics, and I think the easiest way to understand GEN is to look at who actually needs it. First, the validators. They stake GEN to take part in deciding how Intelligent Contracts should be resolved. They can earn rewards, but they also have something to lose if they break the rules. Then there's the user. Whenever you run an Intelligent Contract, you need GEN to pay for the execution and the consensus process. And finally, the developers. They earn a share of the fees generated by people using their contracts. Every contract has its own Developer NFT. Whoever owns that NFT gets to claim the developer rewards. So those rights can actually be transferred. If you look into it you'll understand that The people securing the network, the people using it and the people building on it all have a reason to participate in the same economy. That's what the @GenLayer token is here for

Gm @rarelistio creators What's your rank on the Lb ?

Binance getting hacked again? Wtf User funds are claimed to be safe tho. These were warnings/tweets from CZ last week , crypto is getting wild af Stay safu !

Day in the Life of a jobber part 3 Got this as a response 🤦

I’m looking at @fomopoly_rh because it’s not trying to be another token ticker with a logo attached. The idea is an onchain city built around land plots, with $DEAL tied to the game. The official site says plots normally cost ETH, while selected whitelist participants may qualify for a free mint. Launch is still TBA, so I’m watching the mechanics come into focus before making big claims. The concept is simple enough to understand; the interesting part will be how the economy actually works once people can play. check it out on fomopoly.com

Going for a spot on the @fomopoly_rh whitelist for a free mint! The biggest ponzi game is loading. #FOMOPOLY-69EC

Yo i just ranked up top 1000 on the @rarelistio creator program My rank was around 3009 yesterday and now I'm up Guess I'm doing something right Join me here rarelist.io/r/Oxsteve_ $50k on the line

Wherever I am in the next 2 to 5 years, I pray I'm genuinely happy, successful and living a life that once felt impossible