Nass.js πŸš€ (@PACA) header
Nass.js πŸš€ (@PACA) profile picture

πŸ‘¨πŸ»β€πŸ’» Principal Software Engineer && πŸ’» Front-end Chapter Lead && πŸ’… Designer && πŸ’• Design System Lover ESFP-T

nulldefined
Joined November 2007
Photo by Nass.js πŸš€ (@PACA)Photo by Nass.js πŸš€ (@PACA)Photo by Nass.js πŸš€ (@PACA)Photo by Nass.js πŸš€ (@PACA)Photo by Nass.js πŸš€ (@PACA)Photo by Nass.js πŸš€ (@PACA)Photo by Nass.js πŸš€ (@PACA)Photo by Nass.js πŸš€ (@PACA)Photo by Nass.js πŸš€ (@PACA)Photo by Nass.js πŸš€ (@PACA)
Nass.js πŸš€ retweeted
I'm so tired of reading model outputs. Never have I read so much in my life.
263
145
55
3,084
111,875
Nass.js πŸš€ retweeted
The bug is like a joke. On Alpine Linux, type 257 to 1024 characters of anything and you get root. πŸ’€
31
860
25
9,127
118,339
Nass.js πŸš€ retweeted
Never stop dreaming
41
158
6
1,542
45,472
Nass.js πŸš€ retweeted
most people are using AI to build more. βˆ™ more features βˆ™ more pages βˆ™ more stuff i believe the bigger unlock is using it to make one thing really, really good. βˆ™ speed up your slowest endpoint βˆ™ make CI faster for the whole team βˆ™ fix the bug everyone stopped noticing
24
16
5
147
10,413
Nass.js πŸš€ retweeted
grassland special
248
1,644
759
20,658
8,451,415
Nass.js πŸš€ retweeted
The Matrix: Office Edition
89
1,112
142
7,771
1,362,746
Nass.js πŸš€ retweeted
VΓ­deo 1: uma excelente explicaΓ§Γ£o sobre o por que a Bolsa caiu: a aposta dos investidores foi em FlΓ‘vio e deu errado. VΓ­deo 2: um exemplo prΓ‘tico do que o vΓ­deo 1 explicou. Vejam um investidor desesperado pela derrota da aposta que ele fez.
122
1,502
113
7,397
338,738
Nass.js πŸš€ retweeted
Holy sh*t! Opus 5.5 (Launch) vs Opus 5.5 (Now) Same prompt, same effort. The usage: They nerfed the usage limits. Hard limits are draining MUCH faster !!! The quality: It feels similar no big change but sometimes you feel a little laziness but other than that, it's the same Anthropic, why do you nerf the limits?
24
17
7
373
98,169
Veterinario: "No creo que crezca mucho" El perro cumpliendo 1 aΓ±o:
522
19,951
1,568
212,310
5,703,582
IBOVESPA during Lula’s previous terms: Term 1: 9,000 -> 65,000 Term 2 (pre-2008 crash): 65,000 -> 73,000 *crashed from 73,000 down to 30,000 during 2008 Term 2 (post-crash): 30,000 -> 70,000 Term 2 (entire term): 65,000 -> 70,000 Term 3: 114,000 -> 180,000 ~23% per year (1100% cumulative) for the 12 years in office, including 2008 crash ~4% per year (63% total) for the 12 years he wasn’t in office from 2010-2022 index currently down ~25% overnight
27
66
20
648
57,844
Nass.js πŸš€ retweeted
Γ‰ hoje Brasil vs gringos
107
7,316
145
35,950
341,385
Nass.js πŸš€ retweeted
Is it Postgres, PostgreSQL, or a secret third thing?
2
5
15
1,837
Nass.js πŸš€ retweeted
Me after shipping 10,000 lines of code I’ve never read.
154
869
114
14,838
882,500
Nass.js πŸš€ retweeted
RIP em dash
We analyzed how @claudeai’s Opus 5.5 writes compared with Opus 5 across high-reasoning Text Arena outputs. 10 of 12 writing measures moved in a better direction. Opus 5.5 should be easier to read: - Long content words fall from 41.7% to 38.6%, the lowest share of any Claude model we analyzed. - Sentences are 17% shorter on average, dropping from 12.14 to 10.03 words. The tradeoff is length. Answers get 6% wordier, rising from 453 to 481 words on average, making Opus 5.5 give the longest answers across the Opus family. It also sounds less recognizably AI on two familiar tells: - 95% fewer em dashes - 73% fewer semicolons But a new giveaway may be emerging. Hedges and caveats such as β€œperhaps” and β€œarguably” rise 97%, from 0.39 to 0.77 per 1,000 words, the highest rate of any Claude model we analyzed. What do you think: does Opus 5.5 read more naturally?
170
412
118
13,672
1,397,481
δ»Šζ΅θ‘Œγ£γ¦γ„γ‚‹γ‚»γƒΌγƒ©γƒΌγƒ γƒΌγƒ³ε€‰θΊ«ε‹•η”» ε―ζ„›γ™γŽγ‚‹πŸ€£πŸŽ€
25
903
100
7,199
786,757
Nass.js πŸš€ retweeted
after 5 cups of coffee
436
28,466
843
287,237
11,993,863
Nass.js πŸš€ retweeted
We can finally talk about it: We found a way to extract hidden reasoning of frontier models using a vulnerability in the APIs of every frontier AI company. We verified that our reasoning token count matches billed API thinking tokens 1:1 for most of the prompts we queried.
380
1,959
620
13,506
3,545,618
ε˜δ½γ‚’ε€‰γˆγ‚‹ι­”ζ³•
766
71,758
1,070
602,292
24,272,366
Nass.js πŸš€ retweeted
TLDR
never worked anywhere that fights big company antics as actively as we do.
75
221
43
3,377
700,716
Nass.js πŸš€ retweeted
Day one of GitHub Copilot token-based billing and the customers LOVE IT! They're all celebrating the power and value of generative AI!
147
545
146
5,587
1,246,532