Historian. Novelist. Gamer. Futurist. Non-contrary contrarian. Husband. Dad. Follow if you want to engage in meaningful dialogue. Rare these days!

Joined October 2021
Peter Fabell retweeted
This really is one of @BillMaher’s best-ever monologues, and I don’t say that just because I got a namecheck. Tldr: Socialism is what old people already get and young people want a piece of it.
One reason young people want socialism so much is that they're jealous that older people have it and they don't.
92
385
15
3,333
219,411
Peter Fabell retweeted
#Malfoid #HarryPotter #MalfoidArt MALFOID: A BRIEF HISTORY OF MAGICAL INDISCRETIONS. A story of love, ambition, dark magic, and absolutely catastrophic decision-making.
161
309
70
3,002
116,942
Peter Fabell retweeted
Replying to @ChuckieFFS
You absolute midwit. Congrats on repeating the Wikipedia "Nazis were far-right, end of story" summary you absorbed between TikToks. Yes, the Nazis crushed independent unions, jailed and murdered communists and social democrats, and Hitler liquidated the Strasserite "left" wing of his own party in the Night of the Long Knives. That part is not in dispute. They were not Marxist class-struggle socialists. They hated Bolshevism as a Jewish plot and treated international socialism as the main enemy. Fine. What your middle-school history class skipped is that they still ran a National *Socialist* state: private property existed only as long as it served the Führer’s racial and war goals, wages and prices were controlled, industry was cartelized under state direction, profit was subordinated to the party, and the economy was planned for autarky and rearmament. That is not free-market capitalism, liberal conservatism, or classical right-wing economics. It is the same family of state-directed, anti-liberal, collectivist economics practiced by every other fascist and "national socialist" regime. The name was not a prank; the 25-point program and the early rhetoric were full of anti-capitalist planks precisely because they were competing with the actual socialists for working-class support. Your North Korea comparison is the usual gotcha and it is only half-clever. Yes, names can lie. But the NSDAP did not merely call itself socialist while secretly running a Rothschild hedge fund. They nationalized, directed, rationed, and regimented. The difference from Soviet socialism was mainly that the Nazis kept the owners as managers under party orders instead of shooting them all and installing commissars. Both systems produced shortages, secret police, and mass graves; one just had better uniforms and Wagner. Elon pointing out the obvious—that "National Socialist" is not an ironic branding exercise and that the regime was economically left of any classical liberal or conservative—does not make him a moron. It makes him less obedient to the post-1945 academic consensus that insists every totalitarian who isn’t a full Marxist must be filed under "far-right" so the left never has to share the body count. Money didn’t buy him a brain; it just bought him a platform where he doesn’t have to pretend your selective reading of 1930s Germany is the complete picture. Keep yelling "far-right fascists" while ignoring the actual economic policies and the party’s own name. It is the historical equivalent of covering your ears and shouting.
655
2,845
297
19,925
490,648
Peter Fabell retweeted
Im up to my tits in tokens on this one, but its god damned beautiful. At this point its more art then slop.
12
7
3
36
3,966
Peter Fabell retweeted
Replying to @bitkinbiriisi @grok
1
2
48
14,194
Song Xingyu (宋兴宇), known as "Amazing Ayu" (神奇阿宇), posted how he built this using help from the AI agent 阶跃Amoo. Amoo is StepFun's AI agent (阶跃星辰) used specifically by the STEPX Neo smartphone. Hope this guy gets on X soon! youtube.com/watch?v=TUphy1PY…
这个是真的飞行滑板,高危动作,请勿模仿 作者:B 站 UP 主「神奇阿宇Ayu」,来自中国湖北巴东
1
176
Archive.org is currently offline. We are working to restore service now.
232
1,535
448
17,936
1,724,472
Peter Fabell retweeted
I tried the #malfoid thing
374
1,026
102
11,778
280,724
J'ai vu une Tesla décoller. Et j'ai entendu beaucoup de bêtises. « Ça ne sert à rien. » « Gadget de milliardaire. » « Qui a besoin d'une voiture qui vole ? » Personne. Et c'est exactement pour ça que c'est important. En 1978, Brabham a aligné en Formule 1 une voiture équipée d'un ventilateur géant à l'arrière. Il aspirait l'air sous le châssis et plaquait la voiture au sol. Elle a gagné sa première course avec une avance insolente. Elle a été interdite immédiatement. Quarante-huit ans plus tard, on y revient. Un système de succion qui colle la voiture à la route et lui permet de passer sous la seconde au 0 à 100. Personne n'a « besoin » de faire le 0 à 100 en moins d'une seconde. Comme personne n'a besoin d'une Formule 1. Et pourtant : les freins carbone de votre berline, l'hybridation de votre moteur, l'aérodynamique de votre SUV, les palettes au volant — tout ça vient de voitures de course que personne n'utilisera jamais pour aller au travail. La Formule 1 ne sert à rien. Pourtant elle sert à tout. En 1973, quand la France a lancé Ariane, l'Europe sortait de onze échecs consécutifs du programme Europa. La presse parlait d'argent jeté dans l'espace. Vingt ans plus tard, Ariane détenait la moitié du marché mondial des lancements commerciaux, et chaque satellite de télévision, de météo ou de GPS que vous utilisez a bénéficié de cette obstination. Le progrès a toujours la même tête au début : un truc inutile, cher, ridicule, construit par des gens qu'on prend pour des fous. Ce que j'ai vu à Dallas, ce n'est pas une voiture volante. C'est un châssis, une gestion de l'énergie et une maîtrise des flux d'air que l'industrie automobile mettra dix ans à digérer. Les applications viendront : sécurité, freinage, stabilité, consommation. Elles finiront dans des voitures ordinaires conduites par des gens qui expliqueront, en 2036, que tout ça était évident. La question n'est jamais « à quoi ça sert ». La question est : qui ose encore construire des choses qui ne servent à rien ? Il y a cinquante ans, c'était nous. La fusée, le TGV, le Concorde, le Minitel. L'Europe construisait des choses absurdes et magnifiques. Aujourd'hui, on commente depuis le siège arrière car nous sommes hors course. Merci @elonmusk de nous faire rêver
1,319
5,742
520
35,548
802,714
We live in a time of uncontested war against innovation and creation, where politics become religion and progress is subordinated to ideology by a vast quantity of the intelligentsia. On one hand, you have a dream of globalized communal ayahuasca; the other, symbolic esoterica.
Americans: Please can we have public transit that actually works? American billionaires:
33
Jugaad started as "frugal innovation" but led to overuse because institutions reinforce cutting corners as a cost-saving methodology through lack of enforcement. The problem of izzat is many Indians view cleaning as reserved for the Dalit caste. Both need immediate change.
1
1
38
That Jesus is a kind of Mohammedan prophet desiring to light all aflame into a legalistic covenantal kingdom is... one way to interpret the Gospels. The praxis is to ask the question, "did you mean what I just said?" Jesus answered that many times. At least 7, possibly 17.
I know, Christians follow Jesus and the New Testament. O-kay... In fact, if anything, Jesus’ morality is even more draconian than that of the Old Testament: “Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment: But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment.” In other words, even thinking about killing someone is a capital offense. In fact, Jesus elevated thought crimes to an Orwellian new level (Matthew 9:28-29): “Ye have heard it was said by them of old time, Though shalt not commit adultery: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.” And if you don’t think you can control your sexual impulses Jesus has a practical solution: “If thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.” President Bill Clinton may have physically sinned in the White House with an intern, but by Jesus’ moral code even the evangelical Christian Jimmy Carter sinned when he famously admitted in a 1976 Playboy magazine interview while running for President: “I’ve looked on a lot of women with lust. I’ve committed adultery in my heart many times.” As for Jesus’s own family values, he never married, never had children, and he turned away his own mother time and again. For example, at a wedding feast Jesus says to her (John 2:4): “Woman, what have I to do with you?” One biblical anecdote recounts the time that Mary waited patiently off to the side for Jesus to finish speaking so that she could have a moment with him, but Jesus told his disciples, “Send her away, you are my family now,” adding (Luke 14:26): “Whoever comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and even life itself, cannot be my disciple.” Charming. This is what cultists do when they separate followers from their families in order to control both their thoughts and their actions, as when Jesus calls to his flock to follow him or else (John 15:4-7): “Abide in me as I abide in you. Just as the branch cannot bear fruit by itself unless it abides in the vine, neither can you unless you abide in me. I am the vine, you are the branches. Those who abide in me and I in them bear much fruit, because apart from me you can do nothing. Whoever does not abide in me is thrown away like a branch and withers; such branches are gathered, thrown into the fire, and burned.” But if a believer abandons his family and gives away his belongings (Mark 10:30), “he shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands.” In other passages Jesus also sounds like the tribal warlords of the Old Testament: Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and one’s foes will be members of one’s own household. Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and whoever loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me; and whoever does not take up the cross and follow me is not worthy of me. (Matthew 10:34-39) Even sincere Christians cannot agree on Jesus’ morality and the moral codes in the New Testament, holding legitimate differences of opinion on a number of moral issues that remain unresolved based on biblical scripture alone. These include dietary restrictions and the use of alcohol, tobacco, and caffeine; masturbation, pre-marital sex, contraception, and abortion; marriage, divorce, and sexuality; the role of women; capital punishment and voluntary euthanasia; gambling and other vices; international and civil wars; and many other matters of contention that were nowhere in sight when the Bible was written, such as stem-cell research, gay marriage, and the like. Indeed, the fact that Christians, as a community, keep arguing over their own contemporary question “WWJD” (What Would Jesus Do?) is evidence that the New Testament is silent on the answer.
1
109
1.John the Baptist’s messengers (Matt 11:2–6; Luke 7:18–23) Question: “Are you the one who is to come, or should we look for another?” • Response: He points to the works (blind see, lame walk, lepers cleansed, deaf hear, dead raised, poor hear good news) and says the one who is not offended by him is blessed. No bare “yes.” 2.Samaritan woman at the well (John 4:25–26) She says she knows Messiah is coming and will explain everything. • Response: “I who speak to you am he.” 3.Crowd in the temple (John 10:24–30) Question: “How long will you keep us in suspense? If you are the Messiah, tell us plainly.” • Response: “I did tell you, but you do not believe. The works I do in my Father’s name testify about me… I and the Father are one.” 4.Trial before the high priest / council (Mark 14:61–62; Matt 26:63–64; Luke 22:66–70) Question: “Are you the Messiah, the Son of the Blessed / Son of God?” (Mark under oath; Luke asks both Messiah and Son of God.) • Response: Mark: “I am,” plus the Son of Man seated at the right hand and coming with the clouds. Matthew: “You have said so,” then the same Son of Man saying. Luke: “If I tell you, you will not believe… But from now on the Son of Man will be seated at the right hand of the power of God,” and when they ask “Are you the Son of God?” he answers “You say that I am.” 5.Before Pilate (Mark 15:2; Matt 27:11; Luke 23:3; John 18:33–37) Question: “Are you the King of the Jews?” • Response: Synoptics: “You have said so” / “You say so.” John: “My kingdom is not of this world… You say that I am a king. For this I was born… to testify to the truth.” 6.Man born blind (John 9:35–38) Jesus asks whether he believes in the Son of Man; the man asks who that is. • Response: “You have now seen him; in fact, he is the one speaking with you.” The man worships him. 7.Before Herod Antipas (Luke 23:8–9) Herod questions him at length (hoping for a sign; the context is the charge that he claims kingship). • Response: Jesus gives him no answer. ________________________ Closely related identity challenges that draw a reply 8.Nazareth synagogue (Luke 4:16–30; cf. Mark 6:1–6; Matt 13:54–58) After he reads Isaiah 61 and says the scripture is fulfilled in their hearing, they ask “Isn’t this Joseph’s son?” and demand he do here what they heard he did in Capernaum. • Response: He cites the proverb about a prophet without honor and the examples of Elijah and Elisha, then they try to throw him off the cliff. 9.“By what authority?” (Matt 21:23–27; Mark 11:27–33; Luke 20:1–8) Chief priests, scribes, and elders ask by what authority he does these things and who gave it. • Response: Counter-question about John’s baptism; when they refuse to answer, he refuses to tell them. 10.Demand for a sign (Matt 12:38–42; Luke 11:29–32; Matt 16:1–4; Mark 8:11–12; cf. John 2:18–22; 6:30) Pharisees / scribes / crowd: “Teacher, we want to see a sign from you,” or “What sign do you show us?” • Response: No sign will be given except the sign of Jonah (death and resurrection / temple saying in John); this generation is evil and adulterous; the Queen of the South and Nineveh will condemn it. In Mark he sighs and says no sign will be given. 11.“If you are the Son of God…” — wilderness (Matt 4:3, 6; Luke 4:3, 9) The tempter challenges him to prove it by turning stones to bread or throwing himself down. • Response: Scripture quotations (Deut 8:3; 6:16; 6:13). He does not perform the demanded proofs. 12.Beelzebul charge and “by whom do your sons cast them out?” (Matt 12:22–32; Mark 3:22–30; Luke 11:14–23) After a healing, some say he casts out demons by Beelzebul (an attack on the source of his authority). • Response: A kingdom divided against itself cannot stand; he casts them out by the Spirit / finger of God, so the kingdom has come; blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. 13.Disciples in the boat after the storm (Matt 8:23–27; Mark 4:35–41; Luke 8:22–25) They ask what sort of man this is, that even wind and sea obey him. • Response: He had already rebuked the wind and sea (“Quiet! Be still!”); the calming itself is the answer the narrative highlights. He also asks why they are afraid and have so little faith. 14.Peter’s confession, elicited by Jesus (Matt 16:13–20; Mark 8:27–30; Luke 9:18–21) Not others interrogating him, but adjacent: he asks who people say he is, then “Who do you say I am?” • Peter: “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” Jesus blesses him and, in the Synoptics, orders them not to tell anyone yet. 15.Mockery at the cross (Matt 27:39–43; Mark 15:29–32; Luke 23:35–39) Passers-by, chief priests, and one criminal: “If you are the Son of God / the Messiah / King of the Jews, come down from the cross.” • Response: No reply to the taunt (he speaks other words from the cross). The other criminal’s request draws a promise of paradise (Luke 23:42–43). 16.John the Baptist’s public witness and the delegation (John 1:19–28, then 1:29–34) Priests and Levites ask John, not Jesus, whether he is the Messiah, Elijah, or the Prophet. John points to the one coming after him. • Adjacent: when Jesus later appears, John identifies him as the Lamb of God and the one on whom the Spirit remained. Jesus himself is not the one questioned in this scene. 17.“Who is this Son of Man?” (John 12:34) The crowd, after he speaks of being lifted up, asks how the Messiah can be lifted up and who this Son of Man is. • Response: He answers with the light / walk while you have the light saying, then withdraws. Not a direct “I am,” but tied to the title he has been using.
121
Call me old-fashioned, but I do miss the days when the only way to communicate online was bulletin board systems. There was no Like button, and a healthy argument could run 50 pages. Then, when you both were suffering from carpal tunnel, you'd just get a beer together.
28
Peter Fabell retweeted
Let me show you something extremely cool. 1. Opus 5.5 + CRHQ rebuilt the Pinball machine I was playing in high school. One shot. 2. Then, it built an entire Tribute site, with playable game, 3D Model of the pinball machine, and entire story of how it rebuilt it. It's INSANE! JunkyardPinball.com 3. Then... it built this video. Even more INSANE. It gave me teleprompter to read the script and film myself. It made JunkyardPinball.com/studio so that I can just press "record all" and create 5GB of B-Roll footage on my computer. I uploaded it all and that's it. It constructed this exact video one shot. What the fuck.
34
42
9
323
18,877
Peter Fabell retweeted
Stop what you’re doing and watch this
Legacy media REFUSED to show you a SINGLE SECOND of President Trump's speech and historic state dinner with Xi Jinping tonight at the White House So here's the ENTIRE thing, from start to finish, with translations for Xi's speech DO NOT LET LEGACY MEDIA KEEP YOU IN THE DARK
71
22
1
616
208,476
This is happening more and more: posts restricting comments to the second degree. This is a feature that needs either be removed or enhanced. If people are restricting their post replies, I want to have the option of removing their posts from my feed or just blur the post.
I will never support women taking their husband’s surname
62
The problem with this picture isn't that these are two gay dudes cosplaying as not being gay. The problems with this picture are: • that people have been conditioned to think this is gay • and that masculinity has become a caricature.
I just spent two-and-a-half hours talking to @BlakeSNeff and damn... There's a reason Charlie Kirk called him his secret weapon. Interview out tomorrow.
33