Something I find puzzling about “wokeness” - the people who are the most insistent about the importance of *inclusion* are often the quickest to *exclude* people who disagree with them politically.
Replying to @DanFriedman81
It’s ironic that this is exactly the “woke” argument for diversity - you need under-represented groups (MAGA, in this case) to have a seat at the table to make sure their perspective is heard
Because people have different interests and abilities, we shouldn’t expect everyone to be at a similar level of mastery at a given age. In fact we should expect increasing “inequality” as differences in learning rates compound over time.
“Not guilty by reason of insanity” implies a culpability-based approach to crime, whereas usually softer-on-crime ideas come from a utilitarian approach.
The main difference between AI doomers and everyone else is the doomers really believe in the potential of AI.
If everyone thought AI was moving fast enough to have Dyson spheres in 10 years or whatever everyone would be worried.
Jonathan Paulson retweeted
I’ve always found people who bristle at “American exceptionalism” kind of… weird. Not because I lack self-awareness — I’ve spent my career cataloging every way this country fails to live up to its own rules. But that’s exactly why I love it so damn much. We built a system designed to be shamed by its own founding documents, and it still delivered one of the most spectacular, world-altering runs in human history. A genuine force for human flourishing.
I also found the argument against American exceptionalism to be historically illiterate. Here’s a sample of what we were first at:
• The first large-scale democratic republic in human history — not a city-state, not a monarchy with a parliament bolted on, but a bold continental experiment in self-rule, popular sovereignty, and ordered liberty.
• A written Constitution (1789) with separation of powers and checks & balances — still the oldest national constitution in force anywhere.
• The Bill of Rights (1791): the first time a nation wrote “the government cannot touch these” into supreme law and actually meant it. A dare the world copied — from later rights charters to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
• Public land-grant universities and mass higher education (Morrill Act), opening college to ordinary people no aristocracy would have let near the gates. (but don’t get me started about what happened after we started. Massively federally funding it.)
• Kitty Hawk, 1903 — first controlled powered flight.
• The Moon, 1969 — still the only ones who’ve been there.
• The world’s largest economy since ~1890, powering unprecedented prosperity through grit and genius.
• The assembly line, skyscraper, transistor, personal computer, ARPANET — the backbone of the modern world.
• Telephone, phonograph, GPS — connecting and powering daily life.
• Surgical anesthesia, polio vaccine — saving and transforming millions of lives.
• Jazz, blues, rock ‘n’ roll — brand new American art forms that conquered the globe.
• Hollywood’s dreams, blue jeans, bourbon, and a culture so open a kid like me could devour sushi, burritos, stuffed cabbage, and tabouli in the same week and rightfully think of it all as American.
That’s the part that fills me with genuine love and pride: not just the power or the wins, but the appetite for freedom, creativity, and reinvention. The audacity to say “We the People” and keep trying to live up to it.
What do you love most about this truly exceptional country? 🇺🇸
It’s pretty funny to me that even “serious” advocates of prison abolition can’t answer the most basic obvious question about their proposal (“what do we do with the murderers?”)
Replying to @RobertSecundus @ANNVYSHINSKY
I read all 40 pages of that…and the author still refuses to answer the question!
Instead there’s a bunch of deflections - “who is a criminal is debatable”, “the justice system sometimes has false convictions”, “many murderers are not caught”
Jewish lore is that God should actually count for 0 here. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ov…
On the one hand people shouldn’t overspend on lunch.
On the other hand, it is genuinely weird to me that the norm is for everyone to prepare their own food when basically nothing else works this way. Used to be that everyone made their own clothes too.
IMO this implausible argument (obviously AirBnB is not responsible for housing being expensive!) demonstrates that earning/deservingness intuitions support libertarian ideas - market incomes are pretty “fair” and it would be “fair” to be taxes based on public services consumed.
Someone can certainly *make* a billion dollars. That’s not the same thing as earning.
Growing fast and disrupting markets also often means chasing and wielding market power, political influence, and scale.
Take Airbnb. They heavily lobby politicians against passing housing laws to protect working class residents because it’s bad for their business model.
Airbnb could not exist at its current scale and size without the housing market destabilizations, displacements, and exploits that are supercharging the evictions of working people everywhere from Puerto Rico to Jackson Hole.
Now young people are planning for a future where they will never be able to afford to own a home while others have 20 and live off renting it out to them at extortionate rates with zero protections. Yes, a tiny amount of people can make billions of dollars doing that. And millions of everyday Americans are bearing the cost.





