tx:native 20 companies have opposed OKXICE’s TSV while none have opposed TSV LLC’s (Obsidian). There’s a key distinction here: 🔹 OKXICE: Plans to tokenize existing U.S. equities through a third party, without requiring issuer authorization. Multiple companies have objected, raising concerns about unauthorized tokenization and shareholder rights. 🔹 TSV LLC (Obsidian): Plans to work directly with issuers and their transfer agents to tokenize shares, preserving legally recognized ownership, voting rights and corporate actions before enabling secondary trading through an AMM. Obsidians compliant first approach is very in line @txEcosystem’s and this may not be a coincidence. We know that Obsidian is linked to Texture Capital. This could be @SoloTex_com’s link to testing secondary trading through Obsidians TSV. SoloTex is ready to go with 5k tokenized equities from day one. The team has spoke a lot about wanting approval for secondary trading - Could the link to Obsidian and their TSV be the planned approach?

Last month, we demonstrated high-rate alchemy: turning mercury into real, stable gold, beating CERN’s record by a factor of 10. Last week, we enriched isotopes in the world’s most powerful plasma centrifuge, beating the Soviet record that stood for 40 years. Now, we’re building a fusion reactor in San Francisco to achieve record power density.

USTX is live. Now we build on it. Yesterday’s launch brings another piece of our tokenization vision to life. Wallet ✅ Native liquidity ✅ RWAs & scale mode: incoming 🚀 Issued by @brale_xyz, USTX brings native dollar liquidity to tx - our next step in building TVL and a settlement layer for tokenized stocks and other RWAs. The opportunity is substantial: roughly $300 billion in stablecoins today, with trillions projected in the next few years. We’re building tx to compete for that capital. Our plans include USTX integrations and listings, vault opportunities, and additional user rewards. We also plan to support more chains and stablecoins, giving capital more ways into the tx ecosystem. USTX will continue to evolve and grow, serving as the foundation for everything to come. These pieces are coming together with one goal: make tx a destination for capital and the assets people want to own.

Coming soon: Tradecraft ATS. A U.S.-regulated secondary market for tokenized securities, native to Canton. Operated by Texture Capital (member FINRA). Built with Obsidian Systems @tradecraftfi. FINRA BrokerCheck: brokercheck.finra.org/firm/s…

The hidden architecture is locking into place. This BBVA/Santander update links directly into the U.S. banking framework via Webster Bank and Texture Capital. In August 2026, global banking giant Santander (a key Ripple partner) swallowed Webster Financial for $12.3B, anchoring an institutional blockchain ally to a major U.S. balance sheet. Crucially, Webster Bank is an investor in Texture Capital, which is building out the SoloTex tokenization platform on the tx:native network. By also operating a validator node on the Canton Network, Texture quietly bridges these asset layers straight into the DTCC's tokenization platform. The roots are unifying. #MarketStructure

The DTCC’s Tokenization Launch = The Tipping Point 🚀 Documented.📝👇

‼️THE DTCC’S TOKENIZATION SERVICE GOES LIVE OCTOBER 28TH‼️ This is the first public confirmation from a participant of the DTCC Working Group regarding the official launch date. 10/28✅ This is directly from Fireblocks’ own John Hallahan. 🤝 Remember, Fireblocks directly supports XRP, XLM and HBAR 😏💨 He also goes on to state that: "We're working with several of the participants along with Citadel and being READY FOR THAT DATE”🗓️ "You'd expect to see some really interesting trades happening from the end of this month."🔥 A golden discovery that remained unknown to 99%.😶‍🌫️ Until now.☝️ Watch closely.🍿👇

USTX launches next week. Download the tx Super App and verify your profile to prepare for launch minting rewards. A native dollar balance for the real-world asset markets coming to tx.

A TOKEN is not a MARKET. Tokenizing an asset is getting easier. Making it actually trade? That's another story. @PanteraCapital 's September 2026 report reveals a striking gap: 41% of tracked tokenized asset value generated 99.8% of observed spot trading. What does this tell us about the future of RWAs, and why is @txEcosystem building around this challenge? Let's unpack it. 🧵👇 -- 1️⃣ 🏗️ A token is not a market Imagine building an entire city. Beautiful buildings. Modern infrastructure. Everything connected. But there's a problem. The roads are empty. That's what can happen with tokenized real-world assets. Putting stocks, bonds or funds onchain creates digital representations. But functioning markets also need: • Eligible buyers and sellers • Trading venues • Market makers • Reliable settlement • Sufficient liquidity A token can exist without a meaningful secondary market around it. -- 2️⃣ 📊 The 99.8% paradox Pantera studied 110 non-stablecoin tokenized products, each worth at least $10M. In June 2026: 🟢 Open-access products: • 41% of tracked value • 99.8% of observed spot trading 🔒 Permissioned products: • 59% of tracked value • Just 0.2% of observed spot trading And 46 of 48 whitelist-only products recorded less than 1% monthly spot turnover. An enormous difference. But there's an important nuance. 👇 -- 3️⃣ 🚧 Why do permissioned markets struggle? Imagine a financial highway where every vehicle needs special authorization. The buyer is approved. But what about the seller? The trading venue? The liquidity pool? Its settlement address? For whitelist-only assets, these restrictions can prevent ordinary public trading pools from operating. Yet permissioned doesn't automatically mean illiquid. Many Treasury funds are designed to earn yield and offer redemptions, rather than trade constantly. Different assets need different market infrastructure. -- 4️⃣ 💧 Liquidity needs more than an open road Only 29 of the 110 products passed Pantera's trading-activity and holder-distribution tests. All 29 were open-access. But unrestricted transfers don't guarantee liquidity. Someone still needs to provide capital, quote prices and absorb orders. And for assets that rarely trade, traditional AMM incentives may not be enough. The familiar chicken-and-egg problem: Low volume → fewer fees → less liquidity → even less trading. Solutions may include dedicated market makers, request-for-quote execution or reliable issuer redemptions. -- 5️⃣ ⚙️ This is where TX enters the picture @txEcosystem approaches this challenge from the infrastructure side. Born from the convergence of Coreum and Sologenic, TX aims to bring together: 🔐 Identity and compliance 🏦 Institutional custody 🤝 Market making 📈 Regulated trading infrastructure ⚡ Blockchain settlement TX identifies BitGo for custody, Keyrock for market making, and SoloTex under development with SEC-registered broker-dealer Texture Capital. The ambition? Connect the pieces needed to turn tokenized assets into usable financial markets. Not just create more tokens. -- 6️⃣ 🛂 Compliance at the entrance Imagine entering an airport. Your identity and eligibility are checked before you enter the secure area. Once inside, you don't repeat the entire process at every shop. TX proposes a similar principle: Verify eligibility at the access layer, then allow supported assets to circulate within an appropriately controlled ecosystem. Its Cosmos-based Layer 1 also inherits Smart Token capabilities, including programmable transfer restrictions and issuer controls. Financial rules don't magically disappear, of course. Every asset and venue must still satisfy applicable requirements. The goal is to make compliance compatible with efficient market activity. -- 7️⃣ 💵 Why USTX matters Stablecoins represented $295.5B, or 89.1% of tracked tokenized market value at the end of June, according to Pantera. Why? Because the dollar remains the common language of onchain finance. Assets are priced in dollars. Liquidity is quoted in dollars. Collateral and settlement frequently rely on dollar-denominated instruments. This helps explain TX's introduction of USTX as a native dollar settlement asset. A marketplace needs assets to trade. It also needs reliable money to trade them against. -- 8️⃣ 📈 Demand exists. But where is it going? Pantera uncovered another fascinating contrast. In June: • $67.8B in equity perpetual trading on Hyperliquid and Lighter • $4.2B in observed tokenized-equity spot trading That's approximately 16× more activity in synthetic exposure. Perpetual traders can speculate on equity prices without owning tokenized shares. Leverage and repeated trading amplify these figures, so they don't represent equivalent invested capital. But the contrast is revealing: Demand for onchain financial exposure is growing, while liquid markets for direct tokenized ownership remain a challenge. -- 9️⃣ 🌉 From tokenized assets to functioning markets The next phase of RWA adoption will be measured by more than issuance announcements. The questions become practical: • Can investors access the asset? • Can they trade it at a reasonable price? • Can they redeem it? • Can they use it as collateral? • Can the infrastructure support these activities reliably? This is the challenge @txEcosystem is positioning itself to address. Its architecture and partnerships provide a roadmap. Actual liquidity, adoption and market activity will determine how successfully that vision translates into reality. For validators and infrastructure operators, the lesson is clear: A financial market needs more than tokens. It needs dependable rails, participants and liquidity. The next chapter of tokenization won't be written by issuance numbers alone. It will be written by what those assets can actually do. 🌐 #TX #RWA #Tokenization tx:native