
ALT On offsetses, because we are proposing a clear, ambitious agenda or 4.9% emissions reduction every year, of course we're allowing flexibility. Unlimited, isn't it? They can buy as many as they want. When you're looking at the biggest emitters, they have different options. Some will find it easier than others. I believe emitter also look at the least cost, most efficient way of reducing emissions in their facilities. Some will find it hard like cement. If people want to argue for limits on offsets, that I have to show me how an industry like cement cold reduce emissions without laying people off. I don't want to see Australia making less things, but investing in more technology and making more things, so this regime, the safeguards reform, is so important because it takes 205 million tonnes of emissions out of the air - yes, it provides flexibility - but when you are embarking on such an ambitious proposal, you should.





















