Pinned Tweet
Proof @reformparty_uk: Lee Anderson admitted that his email address was used to help a convicted paedophile named Jason Myrtle. Despite this, he sued Google and won.
This man blamed it on his staff, even though he denied it all. He reported us, KKS, and residents to the police.
If mental health is a legit excuse to kill THREE CHILDREN!
Then you are all saying mental health is a legit excuse for sexual offenses
It's not, no mental health is a legit defense
Lindsay Clancy is a cold killer! She killed her children!
2
546
They want to protect our children from the TRUTH: not the rapists.
Rejected full inquiries into Pakistani grooming gangs.
Refuse to deport foreign offenders and their enablers.
Now they ban 4chan & VPNs so you can't talk about it.
DEPORT THE CRIMINALS.
PROSECUTE THE COVER-UPS.
REAL CHILD SAFETY = NO MORE SILENCE.
Free Speech > Government Lies
648
We made it clear that we do not support this Labour government and its failure to protect our children.
However, there are two important points here. Our benchmark shows that only @grok will prevent coercion and sextortion. None of the others will - the AI which labour wanted to ban!
We would be happy for the minister to review our data on this.
Secondly, the government is right in one respect: most tools will detect Not Safe For Work (NSFW) content. This functionality should be available on children’s devices, but it must be enabled by the parent and not turned on by default across all devices. In fact, Predator Hunters Shield will be launching in Q3 (if not sooner), free of charge, to help protect children.
We also have concerns about the policing of this:
I do not want images of my child to be scanned and sent anywhere so what exactly is the police reporting process on this?
It would also be beneficial for devices to detect NSFW content in photos to prevent them from being created. However, why should this apply to photos taken by the child? What if a parent is having a private medical appointment over the phone and needs to send images to a doctor via video call? Will this now be flagged and sent to the police, putting innocent people at risk of arrest?
While this policy is good in theory, the practical implementation will likely be damaging unless parents are given the final decision and control.
Maybe our own mp @steveyemm would like a preview of this and a sit down on how we can protect children going forward!
We are also working on a dedicated private grooming detection AI Model that this government could done years ago (including Tory party!)
I make no apologies for doing the right thing to protect children from paedophiles. This is about stopping the coercion and sextortion of children, not surveilling or policing people’s phones.
This technology is already on devices. The tech firms just need to switch it on to block children from seeing nude imagery.
There is no reporting, no data collection, no monitoring, and no images leaving the device. All adults will be able to switch off the protections if they are over 18.
This is targeted, proportionate and - most importantly - it protects children from vile abusers.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This is a misrepresentation of people's concerns around how adults must prove their age under this new rule.
~3 million people signed a petition calling for this to stop because they are concerned about privacy by being forced to digitally prove that they are over 18.
petition.parliament.uk/petitions/7301…
gov.uk/government/col…
privacyinternational.org/explainer/2672…
computerweekly.com/opinion/Whats-…
1
1,486
Hey @elonmusk did you know Claude wont help identifying transgender content for a child safety app. Why are you allowing and supporting them?
517
Predator HunTers retweeted
Replying to @Keir_Starmer
Your mandate was to implement the policies in your manifesto.
You didn't have a mandate to destroy the country!
You were NOT given a mandate to:
💠Remove winter fuel allowance for the elderly
💠Allow abortions up till birth
💠Implement digital ID
💠Remove jury trials
💠Assist the suicide of our elderly or infirm
💠Prosecute our veterans
💠Tax us to oblivion
💠Make our country a laughing stock
💠Implement suicidal Net Zero - Increasing our electricity bills to the point of being the most expensive in the world at 3x America's prices, decimating our competitiveness on the world stage.
💠Refuse to control our borders, how many gangs have you actually smashed?
AND many more... Your party is a traitorous disgrace & will be removed & replaced at the earliest opportunity.
Replying to @GitHubCopilot
@GitHubCopilot could have saved all of this drama by just setting the request multiplier by reasoning effort for GPT 5.5 (and would incentivise people to choose lower effort) but setting it at 7.5x for all is just going to rub people the wrong way.
Live stream to this account not working. So here our charity walk to Glasgow from mansfield. For @Ashgate_Hospice and @EmHFoundation
facebook.com/share/v/19VcXMY…
549
This is Jamie Wallace of Clifford Street Wigston the disgraced special police constable for Leicestershire police today has been in Leicester magistrates court for
Making 122 Cat A images and 4 videos of children
217 Cat B images and 2 videos of children
And 112 Cat C images and 1 video of children
Police was alerted about Jamie after @CEOPEducation reported to the police after an account uploaded one of the videos online!
In Leicester Crown Court on 26th May for sentencing.
Also has to report to Wigston police station by Saturday
Reported from our journalists at Leicester magistrates court
@BBCLeicester you not following up on your own reporting. 2 went gulity yesterday at the same court. We not sure of a 3rd man as we missed his hearing
433
Kieron Willans, of Leicester, appeared in Leicester Magistrates’ Court today (Tuesday, 8 April 2026).
He pleaded guilty to the following offences:
Making an indecent photograph/pseudo-photograph of a child (19 Category B images)
Making an indecent photograph/pseudo-photograph of a child (53 Category C images)
Willans attended court with support but left alone. He is next due to appear at Leicester Magistrates’ Court on Thursday, 21 May 2026, for sentencing at 2pm.
He must sign on at the police station by Saturday. His current bail conditions remain in place, which include a prohibition on interacting with anyone under the age of 18 except as part of normal daily life.
Report by our own court reporters at Leicester Magistrates’ Court
1
1
682
Should a convicted paedophile be able to change name or use an aliases?
Yesterday we visited someone we stung for re-exposure and for our new website. He is using a new last name.
0%yes
100%no
0%unsure
2 votes • Final results 1
1
501
We are nearly production ready for a VPN to protect children. Yet #keirstarmer will want us to ban the very users we are trying to protect!
591
We have no launched anything we own the Predetor HunTers trademark in the UK. This confusion is starting tk annoying us and cease and desist letters will be sent!
We are LIVE!!!!!!!!
predhunter.com
DNW1rgqMpFkqEmgtbJL8u8jHk1Dn328hgFrFFBsvpump
We had a message to Kier. You are not helping children with your ideas. You are harming children!
1
447
Are we actually reading this correctly @dorsetpolice police shame are you.
You're basically saying people of Dorset dont worry it didnt happen hear. They went and outside our area to commit thr offence and the came back to three free housing paid by tax payers. But its not us that being harmed!
Replying to @AllisonPearson
This is incorrect information. The figures mentioned are conviction data from the court system and do not correlate to offences committed within Dorset. The crimes may have been committed elsewhere in the country and the figure is based upon the address given to the court at the time of the defendant’s appearance.
1
390
Honest question, darlings: Everyone loses their tiny minds if a parent dares post one single first-day snap with the kid in full school kit. “Hide the crest! Blur the badge! Predators will FIND THEM!” they screech, clutching their pearls.
Yet crickets, absolute radio silence when it comes to these screamingly obvious red flags:
Stop following your child’s school on social media, you muppet. If your profile isn’t locked down tighter than Fort Knox, every Tom, Dick and nonce can see you’re cosy with St Mary’s Primary (made up school here). Location: served on a silver platter.
Do NOT let the school post your kid’s face. Full stop. No “community spirit” excuses.
So let’s drop the performative nonsense and get real: Is the tired old “don’t post uniform pics” lecture now wrong, outdated, or just pathetically half-arsed in 2026?
1
1
230




















