dont worry, the NAP only applies to rational animals

no and thats also not what is being said.

he didnt say that, he said the opposite. xitter.cf/Mann2609/status/211468…

and also further that, and i believe u already mentioned, perception of "insults" change over time. 'scumbag' used to be a terrible insult, now its near meaningless. a similar thing has occurred with words like retard

yes, and u hurled insults at me over that. ive never claimed anything of the sort, i've respected you and held u in high regard. you are significantly better versed in philosophy than me and i will likely never reach ur level of knowledge.

right, which is why rather than explaining u instead hurled insults. this makes soooo much sense!

which mind you, i was right on. xitter.cf/grok/status/2114684931…

u just insulted me far worse over far less.

what exactly is "this garbage"?

no it is not analogous, in the original thread Examiner actively chose to create an argument. he took up the case. I have not actively presented an argument nor tried to.

waow

ur trying to draw an analogy where there isnt any.

so u cant actually rephrase what you supposedly mean. bc u meant what u said, and i understood it correctly. wonderful.

im not wasting my time justifying a 30 second meme tweet for gods sake. either he is acting in bad faith or he is stupid, either way hes a retard. perhaps he isnt bad-faith, thats me being charitable, maybe he genuinely is too stupid to use google.

i would think calling him bad-faith then is charitable. as the other option is actual stupidity. xitter.cf/ProjectAncap/status/21…

ok then, what did u mean?

what? so you do genuinely think we think the NAP is the only principle of ethics?

if it is the case that he somehow is to the best of his ability engaging in a debate and his best ability is being unable to do a 10 second google search then i think i'd be even more justified in calling him a retard.