Prometheus Pool (@PrometheusPool) header
Prometheus Pool (@PrometheusPool) profile picture

https://teapaw.org/t.co/1Lpod0gepH

Joined August 2020
Wondering how you can make #Cardano better? Staying engaged and voting with your delegation is a huge first step!
1/ This blog post gives some guidelines regarding engaging with the rewards sharing scheme used in Cardano. The objective is to help interested people participate in the mechanism more constructively for the betterment of the ecosystem. iohk.io/en/blog/posts/2020/1…
1
1
4
I'm not sure who created this but it's completely unrealistic to expect only 50k people to be watching live
1
282
Replying to @phil_uplc
Hmm, so is this about having a better interface into what your agents are currently doing? Or is this more about giving each agent a better interface to work? Is it an upgraded interface for orchestration, like the next evolution of @kunchenguid's First Mate?
130
Replying to @dannyribar
I wanted to ask a question about this box in Acknowledgements. What if I'm building an integration for an existing TRL 5 project that is open source but is not mine, am I able to check this box or not?
1
39
Prometheus Pool retweeted
Reading a bridge design tells you what should happen. Watching one execute tells you what it does. Recorded a walkthrough. #Bitcoin #Cardano @pogun_io @omerh_
4
23
5
97
8,173
This is really cool, looking forward to more videos like this
11
474
Replying to @DanoFinance
I was curious about your CLMM implementation, is it source available? Some ideas: Multi-asset market making, similar to 3pool Custom liquidity profiles for CLMM Integration into swap aggregators
1
96
Replying to @atlanter @Scalus3
Very cool, always wondering while writing validators whether I'm unknowingly shooting myself in the foot cost wise, or what is getting optimized during compilation to UPLC
3
47
Replying to @DanoFinance
Is the orderbook an implementation of cardano-swaps, and can you add liquidity directly to the orderbook?
24
Prometheus Pool retweeted
Why does the order matter? Get it backwards: incentives first - and capital arrives, then leaves with the rewards. We wrote this into PRIME as a design rule: Fragmentation and efficiency before volume. That's the difference between durable growth and a subsidy treadmill.
1
1
13
173
Prometheus Pool retweeted
Building anything decentralized in 2026, is an insane uphill battle. You’re constantly compared to centralized alternatives that are 1000x more well resourced. You have to work way harder to reproduce a thing that’s easy to do in a centralized way. The cost is significantly higher. The simplest contract change requires a new round of audits. In a centralized system, that same change is quick overnight tweak to the code running on a local server. Users don’t appreciate it until it’s too late. And even when they’re reminded why it matters, they forget quickly after cuz they have goldfish memory. There’s no longer a value premium for doing anything in a decentralized way, and often there’s a discount applied. It just takes a lot of commitment to stick by decentralization in 2026. If you’re building something that optimizes for decentralization in this era, you’re in a unique crowd. A minority. Ppl will crack jokes about you on X. They’ll discourage you. They’ll dismiss you. They’ll say you shouldn’t exist because the centralized options are sufficient. You need real heart and determination to build for decentralization in 2026. But if you can weather through it and stay committed, eventually ppl will appreciate what you built. They’ll be grateful because this industry derives its purpose from the values of decentralization. Every so often, the crowd returns to it its roots. And when they do, you’ll gey your recognition. It ain’t much, but it’s honest work.
21
23
7
182
12,912
Speed is orthogonal to the comparison. Speed is good if you are building for HFT, that's not the only path
1
17
Intent based DEX, sounds like placing a limit order or a CIP-118 partial tx, both of which are perfectly suited for an orderbook world
1
29
Yes, LP's historically lose money, but there is value in the liquidity they provide, that means there is a market for the service Local state orders unlock new paradigms, along with the potential to innovate and shift that market to favor both sides more equally
1
19
I'm not sure what pure AMM means, or what uniswap moved along means, they seem to still be in the AMM business Orderbooks operate on a lower level primitive than bonding curves, that gives them more flexibility than AMMs
1
1
37
Building an orderbook doesn't mean you have to do what HL is doing, you lean into different strengths. Instead of trying to support HFT on a chain with 20 second block times, support long term LP strategies that the average user can participate in
1
1
20
Do AMM's need to be fast? You can achieve the same model as an AMM on an orderbook HFT certainly is one path to profitability, and will never happen on actual decentralized infra Orderbook grid strategies profit from long term volatility movement in a price range, like CLAMMs
1
10
Yes, if you are willing to limit the validator set, require beefy hardware, and require running nodes close enough for 5 ms latency, you can go fast. Not exactly what projects like cardano and ethereum are going for. Doesn't make sense to compete with HL on decentralized infra
2
1
29