I know $KIMCHI was a scam by @pumpfun - i guess they would send this too, they need more liquidity in $KIMCHI Hoping they send this one too. The first titty token paired with $KIMCHI, with $KIMCHI holder rewards. The name was too long, but I managed to make it work: Knockers Incredibly Massive, Curves Heavy Inside. $KIMCHI 63txDQpdqzvoW1BVzFKowKGEQWDD3n2XQBJcMccspump

Better get in $DOLU @dodonlulu Rather than paying attention to AI-generated tits, start paying attention to real builders, and you’ll win. 305K followers is no small number, and the community is growing rapidly. This deserves to run, and I believe it could start an entirely new meta on @pumpfun

Hey, you created it with a 3% fee, but it says something different, so I’m a little confused. Could you explain how it works? Also, Creator Fee: 3% and Holder Rewards: 100% sound contradictory. How exactly does the fee distribution work?

Pumpfun is becoming a joke. @a1lon9 Man, I don’t even want to talk about the $Kimchi situation. It’s all over the place already. But there’s another issue I personally experienced, and this shit needs to be addressed. Yesterday, solana:EseixJpngT2z1prgmpd8kUz71kACKiRjkbQHxWELpump ran to $140K before reversing. EseixJpngT2z1prgmpd8kUz71kACKiRjkbQHxWELpump The @pumpfun UI showed it as created by the same dev behind $PENGU, associated with @pudgypenguins. Naturally, people noticed. The lore started building, and traders saw that connection. I was up 50–60 $Sol holding close to 6% across two wallets. Today, the creator wallet displayed on the UI has changed. So what exactly happened here? If you’re using a big-name dev’s reputation to build conviction around a coin, that connection matters. People ape in, build the lore, make content, and shill the narrative. Then the creator label changes, and everyone’s left guessing. I’m not saying a wallet change proves anything by itself. I’m asking why this information changes and where the transparency is. @pumpfun makes millions every day, yet traders are still left questioning what they’re actually buying into. My advice: be extremely cautious with coins marketed around high-profile devs, previous big winners, or old wallets with impressive lore. Verify everything independently. A familiar name or wallet isn’t proof of legitimacy, and sometimes the narrative itself can be the bait. Crypto is a casino. Getting rekt is part of the game. But we shouldn’t have to gamble on whether the information we’re shown is even reliable. Fix the transparency before people lose faith in the entire platform. Never again. All Proofs below.

The funniest part? You won’t even be able to trade it on Pump.fun. 👀 If you’re boycotting Pump, $REMUS might be the most fitting coin to look at. A FOMO mascot. A coin built around FOMO. And a community where only FOMO users can buy. 😂 $REMUS CA: AggHb1mhQtk3R7R7X1hiKBMqQjpSusiE4ULtYxqHF5DQ #BOYCOTTPUMPFUN

See this here, under the rules.

Just created Bunker on Pump.fun for the upcoming Squads competition. I’ve run some of the biggest private groups in the past, and now I’m looking to bring the right people together again. If you’re serious about competing and have ideas to make this Squad stronger, let’s connect. Dm me at Telegram or X to be added also created squad chat on telegram. t.me/itsabunker Join Bunker: join.pump.fun/HSag/hxh3rb1s