Donavin (@R3spawn33) header
Donavin (@R3spawn33) profile picture

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ปBTC better than Government Lots of trolling here TRADITIONALIST https://teapaw.org/t.co/04j2lWErzJ

Blockchain
Joined December 2014
Photo by Donavin (@R3spawn33)Photo by Donavin (@R3spawn33)Photo by Donavin (@R3spawn33)Photo by Donavin (@R3spawn33)Photo by Donavin (@R3spawn33)Photo by Donavin (@R3spawn33)Photo by Donavin (@R3spawn33)Photo by Donavin (@R3spawn33)Photo by Donavin (@R3spawn33)Photo by Donavin (@R3spawn33)
Russell Brand has been pushing back hard against the Pharmaceutical industry, and now he is facing up to two decades in jail for a โ€œrapeโ€ that happened 21 years ago with no evidence and no DNA, just the word of a dejected woman.
481
2,376
75
20,463
526,491
Donavin retweeted
Women were never oppressed. There was NO oppression. What women call oppression today was just PROTECTION. Let me break it down for you: 1. VOTING: Women say "we couldn't vote." But back then, voting was not a right, it was a RESPONSIBILITY. Only people who owned property, paid heavy taxes, held public office, or were drafted to DIE in wars could vote. 100% of the people dying in wars were men. You want to vote to send men to war, while you sit at home safe? Makes zero sense. Voting was linked to the DRAFT. You vote, you go to war. Men understood that. 2. BANKING: "You needed your husband's signature!" Yes, because by LAW, a woman was LEGALLY PROTECTED from debt. Her husband was the head of household and by law HE was 100% liable for ALL debts she made. If she borrowed and couldn't pay, THEY CAME FOR HIM, not her. Creditors went to jail or lost everything - the husband. So of course his signature was needed. He is the one who goes to prison if you don't pay. 3. PROPERTY - COVERTURE: They cry about coverture. Coverture meant when you marry, your property merges under ONE name, the husband's, because there was ONE tax filing per household, not two like today. ONE household, ONE name, ONE tax. It was not to steal from you. It was because the husband was legally responsible for you. If you got sued, he paid. If you owed taxes, he paid. He took your debts too. These men had mothers they worshipped and daughters they would die for. They were not oppressing women, they were covering them. 4. CONTROLLING WOMEN'S BODIES: The biggest lie. Back then there were NO abortion pills, NO condoms that worked, NO diapers, NO formula, NO government money to raise a child alone as a single mother, NO good jobs for women to survive alone. Who bears the most risk in unprotected sex? THE WOMAN. She gets pregnant for 9 months, she risks death during childbirth, which was very common then. So what did society do? They made sure women stayed virgins until marriage, and made sure men MARRIED them before sex. That is not oppression, that is PROTECTION from becoming a single mother with 3 kids and no food. And it WORKED. Single motherhood rate was less than 5%. Marriage rate was 90%. Children grew up with fathers. Today you have "freedom" - 40% single mothers, fatherless homes, abortions everywhere, and women crying that men don't want them. There was never oppression. There was a system that understood biology and protected women from the consequences of their own choices.
Opinions on Feminism that will leave you like this
460
5,019
288
27,762
1,195,142
Donavin retweeted
Women can't shut up about this stuff. Yes, over several semesters, I hear college girls in and out of sororities share about their lives and men. Married women too. But, I could get the exact same people-watching experience listening to shameless women talking about "last night" outside of a coffee shop in Dallas. (And I have.) It's EASY to hear women talk loudly about who they're having sex with and why. They don't care. As for the podcast, once you realize it's not a brand risk for mainstream brands to advertise on there, you realize millions of dollars are spent on effective marketing to young women from that show. Marketing executives don't care how lascivious the podcast is. Advertising on there is profitable. This would've been unheard of not even 10 years ago. It reveals a lot.
Replying to @realfemsapien
You wrote literal paragraphs about millions of women and their marriageability based on commercials you heard during a podcast and what you heard some college girls say at a yoga class. Just wanted to put it there for you to read in case you hadn't realized what you had done.
5
15
332
45,034
Donavin retweeted
Morally I have a severe problem with this. I donโ€™t think we are the โ€œgood guysโ€ anymore. Weโ€™ve gone full rogue. The events Iโ€™m watching are things that I never thought Iโ€™d see us ever do to anyone. Itโ€™s really disturbing
3,207
2,562
357
16,561
639,990
The โ€œI hate womenโ€ guy will love you the most.
73
244
51
4,563
141,277
Donavin retweeted
Having a gamer girlfriend is the best because... - Sheโ€™ll join your gaming sessions - Your snack stash is respected - She fully understands the boss fight scream - A โ€œquick gameโ€ turning into a 6-hour marathon is totally acceptable - Date night = co-op, takeout, and chill
113
783
156
10,604
343,519
Getting the best out of your marriage for wives
240
9,821
429
45,703
532,540
It really is worthless to tell men to lead when women refuse to submit and follow them.
142
218
34
2,538
98,032
Battlefield 6 ๐Ÿ˜‚ #Battlefield6 | #BF6 | #BF
54
706
40
13,385
447,522
โ€œPick meโ€ is a term used to attempt to shame women who disagree with the sisterhood.
26
30
5
282
5,169
Donavin retweeted
We should pay women to be stay at home mothers in America
439
174
59
3,431
192,807
Never touch porn. Work hard. Find the love of your life. Get married. Start a family. Follow Jesus.
214
294
23
5,516
175,295
Dinner before 7 pm ๐Ÿฅน๐ŸคŒ๐Ÿปโค๏ธ
239
3,960
304
35,545
935,378
By the way, I didnโ€™t say that people arenโ€™t allowed to pursue their dreams or passions. I simply said that your duties and obligations to your own children and grandchildren must come first. Itโ€™s that way for men and it should be that way for women, too.
29
22
4
468
10,069
Replying to @privateeyeruss
As a woman I agree 100%. It gets infinitely worse when women are in groups. Change your thinking, change your life.
2
1
26
1,195
There is a small subset of masculine women who don't mind doing this But 90% of women will be unable to l respect their man if they are the primary provider. It's a visceral response They may endure it temporarily out of necessity but it will affect the relationship's health
Can a woman ever respect a man she financially supports?
4
5
1
94
7,751
Women without babies mother criminals.
17
28
1
370
12,957
152
1,068
107
10,356
471,661
The ONLY time Iโ€™ll ever even consider taking a womanโ€™s advice is if that woman thinks women shouldnโ€™t be able to vote.
42
33
461
22,889