Cori

Abolition of all tribal, ethnic, racial, 'indigenous' or national territories and the return of the land back to [...] [...] the state of relations a priori and sui juris to the (coeval) superimposition of territorial imaginaries through aggression is simply good land relations.

Literally none of them are Canadians, and that’s okay! You can still have respect for foreign immigrants to other people’s lands/settlements as in first inhabited/prior owned lands (first concept + first and continuous material cognate or use/occupancy from first inhabitation).

Republicans blaming Israel is a perfect representation of scapegoating of Jewish people. Instead of blaming you know half the population’s demographic being changed to third world cultures they blame a small steady minority group that doesn’t even have the numbers to do that

Abdul El-Sayed won? More bad signs

Canada in 1980: “I have some Indian hunter ancestry but we are an educated family” Canada in 2026: “I am lakomuquyequeam’sakalonquin’miqmaqmukmook” Like as if a floating signifier (a made up ad hoc name) will make you the same as extinct people from which you get a partial copy of DNA and as if that was esoterically special smh. But with these people it’s all about the lines and patterns and sounds. A smokescreen of absolutely nothing.

El Sayed more like El Evil

I understand the strategy is repetition, and you repeating it to yourself with a change in voice pitch, and esoteric racial myths, but this is going to work less and less. You were not first. - British Columbia built over 10-15 million structures in the last 200 years representing the first and solely present human use/occupancy, and human authorship/imputation in over ~15% of land area. 85% of BC remains uninhabited and unoccupied land area over which the first concept of absentee land ownership and territory was of English Canadian ancestors (BC/Canada) - Land’s endogenous inhabitants and interactors (settlers) were and always will be first. - You are not a meta-racial entity with subject identity persistence (there is no continuity of extinct hunter land relations by virtue of far-removed copies of genetic information). - 99.9998% of BC was categorically uninhabited and unoccupied in the 1800s, even as hunter colonies were simultaneously active “within” the resolution related to as British Columbia in the native land and perceptual relations of the founding cultures, which, was categorically the first to inhabit/interact with virtually all land area (time + space) continuous to the present. By no stretch of logic, is anything more than 0% of BC “stolen land”—which is not a ‘genetic’ property let alone an actual physical property of land. It’s a declarative assumption and social ritual strategy to try and dominate land relations that exist first, prior and independently in hunter offshoots’ (and their extinct, irrelevant far-removed discontinuous ancestors) absence. All this literally means is that: “centuries after westerners introduced the concept of land ownership, property, theft and territory, I’m imagining a racial-territorial-construct of no material relationship to actually steal things”

Fragile masculinity strikes again. What are you compensating for little nationalist chud? This westernized troll, of mixed ancestry, of decades of age and having set foot in virtually none of BC and any of the lands he “claims” is now threatening the province (on purely immaterial, imaginary and ahistorical grounds with regards to both extinct genetic ancestors in past space let alone current participants in the grift in future space)

I can't stop laughing.