The Future of Legal Research, Powered By Super Intelligence.
San Francisco, CA
Joined October 2014
- Tweets5.9K
- Following349
- Followers5.5K
- Likes15.9K
ROSS retweeted
all these lawsuits are totally sustainable and the hallmark sign of healthy innovation first legal frameworks
really great for the USA’s super intelligence startup ecosystem and a sure fire way to expand competitive US SI capabilities to compete with and beat foreign competitors
With 5 (count 'em) near identical suits filed in one day by 2 firms, mass tort theory, @edleeprof reports, may be the next big thing in the gen AI © legal "wars," noting @IsaiahPoritz's coverage for @BLaw:
ROSS retweeted
@RossIntel's request for more time to file its formal request for an en bank rehearing of a 3d Cir panel's decision against it in the @ThomsonReuters case has been ministerially granted. Look for that submission by or on 11/3:
ROSS retweeted
what data was this trained on?
Introducing GLM-Legal
Built on GLM-5.3-Flash, GLM-Legal matches frontier models on mainstream legal benchmarks.
Designed for real legal workflows: contract review, evidence analysis, compliance, and more.
Tech Blog: z.ai/blog/glm-legal
Apply for API Access: z.ai/consultation/legal
Try AutoClaw: autoclaw.z.ai
ROSS retweeted
The most likely long-term outcome of the AI boom will be massive capital destruction in the US, with market share going to cheaper open-source Chinese models, according to Jefferies. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
ROSS retweeted
AI copyright litigation in the USA is brought to you by Franz Kafka
ROSS retweeted
👀
“ROSS is the only appellate guidance available, and it should inform every AI training-data decision now.”
bakerdonelson.com/third-circ…
ROSS retweeted
Breaking: @RossIntel will soon, but not yet, move for an en banc rehearing of the recent 3d Circ panel decision against it in @ThomsonReuter's © infringement suit. For now, they've filed a 21-day extension to make that ask, which plaintiffs' do not oppose:
ROSS retweeted
“Private Section 7 cases can result in break-up-the-company injunctions.”
ROSS retweeted
I wouldn’t sleep on it. Will depend on discovery and expert reports, but I think it has legs.
Private Section 7 cases can result in break-up-the-company injunctions. See Steves & Sons, Inc. v. JELD-WEN, Inc., 988 F.3d 690 (4th Cir. 2021), affirming 345 F. Supp. 3d 614 (E.D. Va. 2018).
ROSS retweeted
.@musicbizworld ran the math on what the TR v. ROSS decision means for Suno
60,202 recordings in the second suit, at the statutory maximum, is a ceiling just over $9 billion
“A market for licensing training data counts even if the rights holder never licensed into it... Suno pleads 60,202 recordings... that is a theoretical ceiling of just over $9 billion on the second suit alone.”
musicbusinessworldwide.com/a…
ROSS retweeted
The Supreme Court has made it clear: copyright is NOT monopolization. Fair use is supposed to prevent that. The Third Circuit whent against that to protect Westlaw's monopoly. xitter.cf/shanedk/status/2106422…
As I said in my video coverage of the ROSS decision, and the "creativity" of Thomson Reuters's headnotes:
They can't go injecting their own opinions and viewpoints into a legal opinion. They can't be expressive and still do their job. That would be misleading people about what the judicial opinion says.
Any creative spark would set a fire to someone depending on them for legal accuracy.
ROSS retweeted
god bless @shanedk
ROSS retweeted
This is how ridiculous the "creative spark" is!
As I said in my video coverage of the ROSS decision, and the "creativity" of Thomson Reuters's headnotes:
They can't go injecting their own opinions and viewpoints into a legal opinion. They can't be expressive and still do their job. That would be misleading people about what the judicial opinion says.
Any creative spark would set a fire to someone depending on them for legal accuracy.
