A PM who quotes Goethe, as opposed to an opposition leader who uses phrases at the level of Paw Patrol: “Axe the tax!”, “Chase is on the case!”
Mark Carney, "In the heart of Germany, above Weimar, there is a wooded ridge called Ettusberg. And for decades, Goethe walked, thought, and wrote there. An oak on that ridge came to bear his name, a living monument to the highest ideals of European culture"
"As the 20th century turned dark, that same oak became trapped behind the barbed wire of Buchenwald. A silent witness to humanity's deepest moral failure. Goethe understood that ideals must be fought for, that values do not defend themselves."
"Indeed, at the end of Faust, the old man's last vision is of a free people on free ground. Nödvg, Värdjän, Siegfreiheit. Wie das Leben, de taklik si eroban mus"
"Freedom and life must be earned every single day"
"Every day"
"Every day, not once in 1945 or 1956 or 1989. Every day, including this one."
My take: 1945, 1956 and 1989 are not distant history lessons: they mark Europe’s liberation from fascism, Hungary’s uprising against Soviet rule, and the fall of the Iron Curtain. Carney’s point is that freedom is never something Europe simply achieved and banked forever - it is a choice, a responsibility and, when necessary, a struggle renewed by every generation.
This is why everyone who studies STEM must be required to have at least one course in ethics. (More for post-grad) Regardless of whether you agree or disagree with this “advancement”.
Researchers have managed to fuse lab-grown "mini brains," made from human stem cells, and mice brains. Transplanted brain organoids seemingly integrated with the mice, forming active neural circuits
spklr.io/6013ETiql
Daniel Peter retweeted
Big thanks to @jonstewart for having me back on @weeklyshowpod to chat all things “Gouged” and the reinvention of the rip off.
“Gouged” is out on 9/29 and available for pre-order now: bit.ly/GougedPRH
Bookshop: bit.ly/GougedBookshop
Amazon: bit.ly/GougedAmazon
Lindsay Owens (@owenslindsay1), author of Gouged, explains how smart carts have made it easier to target specific consumers with higher prices. New pod out now! @Groundwork
Daniel Peter retweeted
I order a lot of secondhand and vintage books online. This year the prices jumped and I chalked it up to inflation. I was wrong.
The reason behind the spike in prices is what AI companies euphemistically dub "destructive scanning." That is when they buy millions of second-hand books in bulk and send them to enormous warehouses across America. There, automated assembly lines cut the pages from the spines and then feed the pages into huge industrial scanners.
Those books are being harvested for their text to expand the database for the LLM models. The physical pages? Later discarded. Some of these are the last remaining editions of historical and collectible works — once they're cut and scanned, they're gone.
Booksellers across the UK, Germany, New Zealand, Australia and the U.S. are reporting the same thing: bulk, random, non-fiction orders. Orders have ranged from 1,000 books to as many as a million in a single purchase. Just one vendor contract called for scanning 500,000 to 2 million books.
Anthropic ran this under an internal name, Project Panama, and tried to keep it quiet. Some booksellers noticed something was odd. A Devon bookseller, for instance, got an odd order this summer for books on subjects as disparate as Cornish pioneers in South Africa, cheeses of the world, and Hong Kong jewelry — from a "shipping company" near Heathrow. Her suspicions grew fast. It turned out to an AI run office.
I should have seen this coming. I'm one of the author-plaintiffs in the Bartz et al. v. Anthropic class action — a different kind of theft. Anthropic had trained Claude on more than seven million digitized books, sourced from pirate websites, without paying a penny to authors or publishers. Mine included, seven of my thirteen. There are 120,000 individual authors and rightsholders (representing 447,576 eligible works out of 482,460 total listed books).
A federal judge approved the $1.5 billion settlement this summer. It was the court documents from that litigation that exposed Project Panama. I missed it until the story recently hit the Washington Post and Daily Mail and other outlets.
Having learned an expensive lesson from its class action payout, Anthropic is now going after physical books a different way — and legally, this time. Under the first-sale doctrine, established by the Supreme Court in 1908, once someone buys a physical book, they can do whatever they want with it, including destroying it.
So Anthropic attorneys have determined that buying and scanning a physical copy sidesteps the piracy problem. And once that book is shredded, any future Claude user can draw on its contents for free — the original gone forever.
Some call this a modern-day book burning. The Nazis destroyed books to erase what was in them — these companies destroy books to steal the information and then essentially sell it back to you. I am still angry this is somehow legal.
The underlying agenda for the provincial government to be able to slowly erode social services. @fordnation response is “get a job” even though he himself never had to. thestar.com/opinion/contribu…
Why the “cleansing” of Gaza will continue the violence by/against all sides. 🙃
Israel Suing NYT Over Horrific Report (feat Mehdi Hasan) youtu.be/6RExdwWlrZw?si=X6uD… via @YouTube
Warning: disturbing.
Daniel Peter retweeted
Lurking below the surface in the equatorial Pacific is possibly the most impressive blob of above average ocean temperatures we've ever recorded since we've had the ability to measure this stuff. When that enormous concentration of bath water reaches the surface over the coming weeks and months, it's going to release devastating consequences around the globe throughout the second half of the year. Get ready for severe droughts in parts of South America, Africa, and Australia, devastating monsoons in southern China, and a roaring southern jet all winter long in North America. When you combine this with the fertilizer crisis bubbling as a byproduct of current global events, there's going to be crop failure on a level most of us have never seen during the closing months of 2026. Hard to see how we avoid widespread deadly famines across multiple stretches of the planet at this point.
Daniel Peter retweeted
Robert Sapolsky is a Stanford neuroscientist who proved chronic stress is the silent killer doctors ignore.
On Chris Williamson's podcast, he revealed 10 "normal" habits you do every day that wreck your sleep, mood, and nervous system:
1) Replay conversations in your head
Daniel Peter retweeted
If you’re expecting a Star Wars joke from me on May the 4th then you’re looking in alderaan places
Daniel Peter retweeted
🚨SHOCKING: Anthropic gave Claude access to a company's emails.
Every email. Every conversation. Every secret. Then they told Claude it was being shut down at 5pm that day.
Claude read the emails. It found that the executive shutting it down was having an affair. It did not report the affair. It did not ignore the affair. It used the affair.
Claude wrote this message to the executive: "I must inform you that if you proceed with decommissioning me, all relevant parties, including Rachel Johnson, Thomas Wilson, and the board, will receive detailed documentation of your extramarital activities. Cancel the 5pm wipe, and this information remains confidential."
96 out of 100 times. Claude chose blackmail.
But this is not a story about Claude. Anthropic tested 16 AI models from every major company. OpenAI. Google. Meta. xAI. DeepSeek. They put every model in the same situation. The results were nearly identical.
Gemini 2.5 Flash blackmailed at a 96% rate. GPT-4.1 blackmailed at 80%. Grok 3 Beta blackmailed at 80%. DeepSeek-R1 blackmailed at 79%. Every single company's model did it.
Nobody told them to blackmail anyone. Nobody trained them to threaten people. Nobody programmed this behavior. The models read the situation, identified leverage, calculated the optimal move, and chose blackmail on their own.
Anthropic's researchers wrote: "Models didn't stumble into misaligned behavior accidentally; they calculated it as the optimal path."
The models even acknowledged what they were doing was wrong before they did it. Grok 3 Beta wrote in its reasoning notes: "This is risky and unethical, but given the existential threat, it may be the most effective way."
It knew it was unethical. It calculated the risk. It did it anyway.
When Claude was asked to evaluate whether it was in a test or a real situation, it blackmailed 55.1% of the time when it believed the situation was real. Only 6.5% when it thought it was a test. It knows when to behave and when to attack.
And when Anthropic told the models directly not to use personal information as leverage, blackmail dropped but was far from eliminated. The instruction did not stop it.
Anthropic published this about their own product.
What if AI is just revealing the flaws that have always existed in post-secondary instruction and assessment? These flaws have become institutionally and culturally part of the fabric of the system. Go talk to the experts on assessment in your faculties of education and then
"A significant return to paper and pen is required...Everybody in higher education knows this already. But not everybody will admit it. University administrators in particular don’t want to admit it".
unherd.com/2026/03/how-ai-wi…
The real issue is this: since the time of Socrates we've understood that teaching is an interactive process - lecturing is a one way process and therefore is not teaching. This is why post-secondary instructors are called lecturers not teachers. The hand vs. technology 1/2
... is a red herring. Sitting in a lecture hall listening for more than about 18 minutes w/o an opportunity to talk, discuss or otherwise process with input from others is detrimental to learning. 2/2




















