Wealth inequality is real. But what can the numbers actually tell us?
A discussion from Penn State's SOC119 class raises an interesting question: Are we confusing the distribution of wealth with the broader questions of how wealth is created, whether living standards are improving, and what constitutes a fair outcome?
I'm not offering a solution. I'm suggesting we examine the assumptions behind the argument.
What am I missing?
For what it's worth, I am publicly endorsing @Hatley4Governor
I have listened to his proposals and spoke briefly with him, leading me to believe that he is the best candidate for the job.
He clearly wants to improve the state for everyone who lives here. But more importantly, he recognizes many of the problems with the way the state is governed.
I ask that you consider giving your vote to someone with a history of building businesses, of investing in the people who made them successful, of admitting their mistakes, and recognizing that "the way it's always been" isn't necessarily the right way.
That person is David Hatley.
This is a fantastic analogy and we need to discuss this as a society.
Everything is connected.
It's easy to blame corporations, but they're not conscious entities; they're merely the manifestation of the decisions made by the CEO and Board.
The CEO is merely following the incentives of the system.
The system has been tinkered with so many times over the years that it's almost impossible to point the finger at any particular thing.
The politicians, even when well-intentioned, are quickly corrupted by a permanent bureaucracy that biases everything it touches.
The bureaucracy itself is nothing but the collective actions of countless individuals wanting to collect a paycheck.
It is a daunting task to find the "correct" loose string on this massive knot, but we've got to start somewhere.
I think the first step is to change the incentives for businesses in America. They are far too biased towards financialization.
Where would you start?
(Credit to @mattmurphyshow for posting this picture.)
Check out the comments under the AP post.
Don't necessarily focus on what each person is specifically saying, but the sentiment.
Sure, most people don't comment unless they have a strong opinion one way or another, but I feel like this is just another example of something that unnecessarily strengthens the division in America.
Politicians know that they are among the least respected individuals on the planet. In surveys, they're frequently ranked below cockroaches, root canals, and head lice.
Yet they enjoy 90+ percent re-election rates?
How do they do it?
By making us hate each other more than we hate them.
Never forget who caused this mess.
It wasn't the blue collar mechanic in the deep South.
It wasn't the blue haired teacher on the Pacific coast.
It was the people who convinced us to elect them and have spent their time in DC implementing laws and policies that extract maximal wealth from the rest of us. Encouraging us to look upon our neighbors with suspicion. Using our highly trained military as a clumsy cudgel against any foreign leader who dares to desire their own sovereignty.
The path these psychopaths are taking us down is not written in stone, but it requires that we put aside our trivial differences in solidarity for the greater good of destroying their reign of terror.
🇺🇸
BREAKING: The Pentagon says it will livestream the firing squad execution of Fort Hood shooter Nidal Malik Hasan. apnews.com/article/fort-hood…
Jon Thorp, Independent Thinker retweeted
WE COUNT THE ENEMIES WE KILL. WE RARELY COUNT THE ONES WE CREATE.
Nidal Hasan was a patient on my floor in the surgical trauma ICU at Brooke Army Medical Center.
I wasn't there when he arrived. I had just left for my deployment to Mosul, Iraq. But the nurses and doctors who cared for him were my peers and my friends, and I know exactly what that required of them, because every one of us had done some version of it before. Before anyone tells me what strength looks like, understand what that work demands.
I have cared for a drunk driver who wiped out an entire family and landed in our ICU himself. I have cared for gang members who shot up a block while children were stepping off a school bus, then ended up on our unit with bullets of their own. I have kept alive people who murdered their own families and failed at taking their own lives. And in Iraq, I saved the lives of the very enemy fighters who had just tried to kill us and miraculously survived our response.
Every one of those patients got our best. Not because we felt anything for them, but because of who we were. You set aside anger, grief, prejudice and every personal feeling you have, because a life in front of you is a life in front of you. That's the oath. That's the duty.
So when Hasan came through those doors, my colleagues did what we had always done. They preserved the life of a man who murdered thirteen people and would have killed them too, given the chance. He killed those men and women in one of the very same buildings many Soldier's like myself have been in when I was stationed at Fort Hood.
He is alive today because they did their jobs. That was not sentiment. It was a hard, tangible expression of the values this country claims to stand for. Our principles had to mean something even when the person benefiting from them had violated everything we believed in.
Now the Pentagon plans to livestream his execution by firing squad on Dec. 3, and our leaders apparently believe turning his death into a public spectacle will demonstrate American strength. I think it demonstrates how little they understand the enemy they claim to be fighting. We kept Nidal Hasan alive, now our leaders want to make him a martyr.
Hasan walked into Fort Hood expecting to die. He believed his death would be rewarded. At his trial, he called no witnesses and offered no defense, and his own court-appointed lawyers worried he was seeking execution. He failed at martyrdom once. Now we're about to hand it to him, in high definition, for every extremist with an internet connection to replay, manipulate and celebrate.
We supply the footage. They supply the meaning.
Long after the politicians finish congratulating themselves, that video will still exist. Their moment of bravado becomes somebody else's recruiting material for decades. And this failure to think past the immediate display of power reaches far beyond one execution. We count the enemies we kill. We rarely count the enemies we create.
Look at the school in Minab, Iran, where multiple investigations attributed the strike that killed more than 100 children and their teachers to us. You cannot bury people's children beneath the rubble of their classrooms and expect a speech about American intentions to decide how they remember you. No denial brings those children home. No claim of good intentions makes their parents forget whose weapons killed them.
If those were our children, we would remember for the rest of our lives. We would demand accountability. Many of us would want vengeance. We would tell their stories to the next generation. We know this because we did exactly that after September 11.
Why do we imagine other people love their children less, grieve less deeply, or remember less clearly?
We have developed a horrifying talent for creating more terrorists than we will ever stop. We inflict suffering, evade responsibility, and then act as though the anger that follows came out of nowhere.
Think back to the first time you saw one of those al Qaeda videos of an American being beheaded. Remember the sickness in your stomach. Remember the rage. Remember thinking that only savages would film a killing and send it out for the world to watch. Now ask yourself what the rest of the world will see when the camera is ours.
Terrorist organizations stage executions for the cameras. Authoritarian regimes make death a public spectacle to feed fear and rage. Watching our own leaders reach for those same tools should force us to confront how much of ourselves we are surrendering in the name of defeating them.
The line separating us from the people we condemn has to live in our conduct. A flag cannot hold it for us. Neither can a uniform, a title, or a declaration that we are the good guys.
On that ICU floor, on a bloody street in Mosul, and in trauma bays across this country, people like my colleagues hold that line every day under circumstances most will never face. They keep monsters alive because their duty and their humanity are bigger than their hatred of what those monsters have done.
Execute him if that's the sentence. But do it the way a confident nation does; quietly, lawfully, and without giving him the stage he always wanted. Let him be forgotten.
I expect our leaders to show at least as much discipline as the nurses who had to care for him.
They keep telling us they are defending what makes America different. Every day, they make that difference harder to see.
Robert W. Burns III is the editor and publisher of The Space Coast Rocket, an Army veteran and a retired trauma nurse. The views expressed in this column are his own.
Social Security is trending in my feed.
It is well-known among younger generations that it is a near certainty that it will not be around for their retirement. At least not as it currently exists.
The honest question is not whether people will continue to receive it, but how to adjust the system so it continues to exist.
The Boomer generation appears to be adamant that they will not be stuck paying this bill.
This seems to be a NIMBY-type issue: Everyone wants the benefits, but they refuse to accept the costs.
Precisely why it's insolvent.
What's your solution?
This is interesting because of the state of technology.
The obvious defense is that this is merely an AI creation. The presence of an audio file with Trump's voice won't convince anyone, nor should it.
The existence of images and video are similarly becoming more and more difficult to validate.
Do you think it likely we'll see a rapid increase in digital signatures in the near future in order to prove legitimacy? Or perhaps some other technology of which I'm unaware?
BREAKING: This is HUGE.
Iranian officials say they’re preparing to release voicemails left to them by Donald Trump and if they do so, the political fallout could be explosive.
They claim Trump begged, threatened and even tried to bribe Iranian officials to reopen the Strait of Hormuz—because soaring gas prices were becoming a political nightmare ahead of the midterms.
Not national security. Not principle. Not peace.
Just a desperate scramble to keep voters in line until November 3.
If those recordings exist, America may finally hear what desperation sounds like when the cameras are off and Trump can't control the narrative.
How humiliating.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The original claim is satire from @HalfwayPost, whose bio calls it "halfway true comedy and satire" that "improves" facts rather than reporting them. No credible sources report Iranian officials planning to release any such Trump voicemails.
x.com/HalfwayPost
halfwaypost.com/2026/08/24/the…
mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-halfway-po…
What's up with buyers these days?
I'm selling a horse trailer because we got rid of our horses. I keep getting messages asking only what my lowest price is.
If you're interested, come look at it. If you can articulate why I should accept a lesser amount, give me a reason.
But don't start the conversation with "What's your bottom dollar?"
Good grief.
Are they just looking to flip it?
Jon Thorp, Independent Thinker retweeted
I have vacillated between tears and anger this morning while finally reading the transcript of what @FBI put Brian Cole Jr. through on the morning of Dec. 4. I sincerely hope @dbongino and @Kash_Patel burn in whatever eternal punishment is the opposite of Kash's beloved Valhalla.
storage.courtlistener.com/re…
I had a refrigerator that died less than a year after I bought it.
Something happened to manufacturing since the 70s.
Voyager 1 and 2 were designed for a 5-year mission to Jupiter and Saturn.
Both launched in 1977.
It is now 2026.
Voyager 1 is over 25.5 billion kilometres from Earth.
Voyager 2 is over 20 billion kilometres away.
Both are still transmitting data.
The radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) that power them have been decaying for 49 years.
Each spacecraft now generates approximately 250 watts - down from 470 watts at launch.
Engineers continuously shut down instruments to compensate.
Science instruments will continue to be powered down; NASA’s goal is to keep at least one operating on each spacecraft into the 2030s.
Designed for 5 years. Running for 49.
The most durable engineering achievement in history.
Regardless of what might be causing this, I'm once again struck by how little regard our government officials have for the Constitution. The authority to wage war--regardless of what label you use--is NOT held by the president.
The president and every representative who is allowing the military to be used as a presidential plaything needs to be immediately thrown out of office. Prison time isn't out of the question, either.
BREAKING: Iran has issued "Code 100," its highest alert level, for all armed forces in the past hour, covering the IRGC, the Army and security forces, per initial reports.
Trump cut short his weekend at Camp David to return to the White House tonight citing the potential for significant escalation, Netanyahu cut short his US trip to return to Israel the same day, and every US embassy in the Middle East has issued a security alert in the past hours.
It's hard to believe that 9/11 was 25 years ago.
It doesn't exactly feel like yesterday, but it certainly doesn't feel like a quarter century!
Where were you? Is it a vivid memory for you?
I was pretty young for the Challenger explosion so I don't remember much of that day. Prior to 9/11 I remember people talking about remembering minute details about where they were when JFK was assassinated, but it seemed odd to me that they'd recall to such degree.
Then it happened to me.
I was on barracks clean-up duty at Fort Campbell. I was mopping the hallway and noticed the rest of the guys sitting in front of the TV in the day room.
Annoyed, I walked in and asked them what movie they were watching instead of cleaning like they were supposed to be doing.
"This isn't a movie, it's the news. A plane just hit the World Trade Center!"
Pretty soon the second plane hit and I told everyone that we were now at war.
In the blink of an eye our entire posture changed.
Open gates, broken fences, and lackadaisical security turned into an almost Orwellian surveillance state.
Sometimes I wonder how much we truly lost that day.
I made the mistake of reading the 911 dispatch for the Clancy trial and can't get it out of my head.
The absolute terror experienced by those poor children and the complete devastation of the father are absolutely heartbreaking.
The mom is a monster and deserves to rot in a tiny cage.
I try not to comment on things like this, but it is abhorrent that so many people are supporting that piece of human filth.
No amount of mental anguish justifies murdering children, especially your own.
Sure we might have an ever more rapidly increasing federal debt, more and more people worried about making ends meet, and new forever wars, but at least we have a gulf and lake named for us!
#winning
BREAKING NEWS!
TO: Office of the Secretary, Department of the Interior
FROM: Director, U.S. Geological Survey
RE: Lake America rename
Sir,
As of 4:30 pm today the U.S. Geological Survey has officially designated the former Lake Ontario to be renamed as Lake America in all official USGS electronic documents.
The change will begin occurring in printed documents over the next several days.
This change has also been made official in the Geographic Names Information System.
Should you have any further questions please contact me for clarification.
Thank you
Ned
Dr. Ned Mamula
Director, U.S. Geological Survey
United States Department of the Interior
There's an interesting thought experiment used in liberty-minded circles with regards to domestic laws, where we critique a law based on the potentiality of violent enforcement.
In other words, is it morally justifiable for law enforcement to respond to a person's home with guns drawn for non-compliance?
It is useful to apply that same thought process here. What response is the US willing to consider in order to force third-party nations to comply with this demand?
Theoretically, this response will include everything up to and including the use of force. Anything short of this can easily be disregarded.
The pertinent question then, is how broadly we foresee this war going?
Is it realistic or even reasonable to expect other nations to sit back and accept these demands to cease international trade?
Are we prepared to expand a limited kinetic war into a regional or even global conflagration?
This isn't just empty chest thumping. There are potentially very real and very massive consequences.
Trump: No one has given the Islamic Republic of Iran a greater opportunity to make a Deal than me. TRAGICALLY, for them, they have failed to take it.
Therefore, today, I am announcing the MOST CRUSHING ECONOMIC OPERATION EVER TAKEN AGAINST ANY COUNTRY! This will be Economic Warfare and Isolation on an unprecedented scale. Their navy is gone, their air force is destroyed, their military factories are now rubble, their currency is worthless, and their country is hanging by a thread.
Today, I am also announcing that ANY country that allows its financial institutions, businesses, airports, or government entities to provide any type of lifeline to Iran will itself face TREMENDOUS Economic Consequences. Oil smuggling, swap lines, cash transfers, exchange houses, ship registries, front companies — It all needs to stop NOW. You know who you are.
This will be an ECONOMIC D-DAY, and we need all of our Allies to stand with the United States of America to isolate, and defeat, the Iran threat. These maniacs are on the ropes, and these HISTORIC MEASURES will cripple them and their ability to project terror worldwide. IRAN WILL NEVER HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.
Is it time to talk about impeachment again?
Do the actions with respect to Iran in totality constitute a serious abuse of public trust? Can Trump's actions convincingly be described as a threat to the United States?
Completely ignoring any other possible transgressions, the war with Iran – because it is clearly a war irrespective of the terminology they're using – has caused irreparable harm to the future prosperity of Americans, to the point of being an existential threat.
America's place in the global order is seriously in question directly because of these events. More dangerously, our ability to deter hostile actors is now uncertain at best.
If we are to believe the recent rumors that the Trump administration is considering nuclear options, which I think we would be foolish not to believe, we are looking at what many would consider serious crimes against humanity putting us at grave risk of fierce retaliation, the likes of which we've never seen domestically.
Sadly, there is no impeachment process for members of Congress despite their complicity in these events.
Shouldn't there be widespread protesting?
I sat down and listened to the so-called "Great Debate" between Candice Owens and Andrew Wilson. Here's the synopsis so you don't have to go through the same pain.
TL/DR: Anyone who claims that either of them "won" is clearly biased.
First off, in no way could this be considered a debate. They were each merely given roughly an hour and a half to ask questions of the other person. That is not how a debate is structured.
Had they actually used a classical debate structure we would not have seen them talk over each constantly and, more importantly, we would have gotten an actual presentation of a claim accompanied by a rebuttal.
Furthermore, clearly neither of them came to this event with the intent of actually listening to the other side. I think Andrew did a slightly better job of hearing counterpoints, but they both were convinced of their own correctness and were not open to any points of contention.
This is a perfect example of why I am promoting wayfinding.
Not only would Candice and Andrew have benefited from this approach, but the listener would be able to quickly identify this as a low quality event.















