๐ฃ๐ฑ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐ช๐ ๐ช๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ท๐ญ๐ช ๐ฒ๐ผ ๐ท๐ธ ๐ต๐ธ๐ท๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ธ๐น๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ธ๐ท๐ช๐ต https://teapaw.org/t.co/j66yBBzH2P
Joined December 2019
- Tweets23.8K
- Following2.8K
- Followers1.4K
- Likes461K
Pinned Tweet
Are you a lib? Do you like annoying rightoids? Do you wish you could force them to have to write "Trans Lives Matter" or "Hillary 2024" in every comment or it gets removed and a bot calls them an rslur?
rDrama might be right for you!
Sign up today!
rdrama.net/
Okay I now agree with everyone saying that this dude needs to step down as leader
I asked Hakeem Jeffries about attendance appearing decisive in the Pete Hegseth vote. (11 House Dems did not vote tonight.)
He told me and reporters: "I haven't had a conversation with anyone on the floor team about what may or may not have happened in terms of the Hegseth resolution, but this is not the end of it. It's just the beginning."
MFW I turn some fat rightoid "operator" into red mist with $50 of drone equipment I ordered off Temu (you can't see the dildo in this picture because it's inside of me):
The Homocracy retweeted
I fear it's only a matter of time before the Democrats "forget" that we elected them to hold Trump accountable and instead meander off into their usual ideological overreach.
The Homocracy retweeted
those of us who agree with his politics are actually glad that someone with his stature is spending his time responding to endless deliberate lying on this topic so that people like you donโt succeed in persuading other Dems of a false and destructive theory of politics
The Homocracy retweeted
Chris I didnโt realize you were still acting like a such wounded snowflake. So let me respond. That sentence is not support for the war. Itโs support for regime change in Iran, ffs. I do support regime change in Iran. I also support regime change in China, Cuba, North Korea, Russia etc. That doesnโt mean I am in favor of a war with these countries, never mind an illegal, ill-planned, and incompetently run war by an administration you have lent aid and comfort to for so long.
Do you really not understand the difference? Or are you once again deliberately lying and twisting things like the rightwing Alinksyite โ sorry Gramscian โ you so proudly claim to be? I have explained my views on this at great length. But you have changed the issue from supporting this war for supporting the idea of regime change. You are far more responsible for this war than I am โ by far โ because of your tireless efforts on behalf of this administration and the political forces holding it up. You made a wish on a monkey paw for a โdisruptiveโ leader, got one, and now want to pick and choose which rubble you support and which you donโt.
As for accusing you of anti-Semitism. I didnโt do that either. Here is what I do accuse you of: lending aid and comfort to anti-Semites and people who pretend that their opposition to Israel isnโt singularly driven by a special animus towards Israel that cannot be explained without reference to a double standard that is anti-Semitic. Your support for the New Right and legitimization of this Popular Front is what makes it hard to fight anti-Semitism. You would know that if you worked a little harder at it.
"I might as well say it clearly: I'm for regime change in Iran." -Jonah Goldberg, February 24, 2026.
And falsely accusing me of antisemitism here is cheap and disgraceful. It's the kind of smear that not only demonstrates low character, but makes it harder to fight antisemitism.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Goldbergโs quoted statement appeared in a Feb. 2026 column that supported regime change in Iran as a goal in principle but argued any U.S. action requires congressional approval, lacks a clear plan, and would be unconstitutional if unilateral.
latimes.com/opinion/story/โฆ
thedispatch.com/article/iran-tโฆ
The Homocracy retweeted
Youโre right
I got Trump Derangement Syndrome
I hate the motherfucker
And you know what?
I donโt want to get rid of it.
I donโt want to get better
I want to get worse.
I want to hate him more.
The Homocracy retweeted
Honestly just this x1000
Democrats donโt have a mandate for policy right now - they have a mandate to rebuke Republicans
They still need to earn trust, work on affordability, etc
Iโm glad Democratic leaders are taking this approach so far
I'm really glad we won and all that but the thing I most happy about is that I stopped getting all those fucking texts.
3
17
469
The Homocracy retweeted
Comment Etiquette@commentiquetteNov 4
Bad day for pedophiles and cunts
57
620
7
7,781
74,960
The Homocracy retweeted
Quick, chud! Tell them about Malfoid! The polls are closing, chud! Have they seen your Based Anakin Skywalker memes? Do they know about how Warhammer is yours, Halo is yours, Lord of the Rings is yours, Star Wars is yours, and Harry Potter is yours, chud? Did you tell them?
The Homocracy retweeted
When Democrats take power again, we need to take a two-pronged approach to cleaning up our institutions and communicating about it. This will rely on investigations, single-issue bills, and an aggressive social media presence from our strongest Democratic communicators.
First, Democrats need to launch investigations into the insider trading, pay-for-play, and pardon economy that Donald Trump has created. We need answers to some very serious questions. Did Trump ACTUALLY remove tariffs on Vietnam and then get a golf course announcement just weeks later?
But these investigations can't happen in isolation. They need to be paired with single-issue bill after single-issue bill that directly addresses whatever corruption is being uncovered.
For example, if Democrats uncover 28,000 insider trades coming from the oval office, we introduce a bill banning executive branch officials from trading individual stocks. Force Republicans to vote on it. If they vote against it, make them explain why.
Then, it's necessary to have our strongest communicators flooding the zone about the corruption, and what we're doing. Flipping Steve Bannon's strategy back on him.
Imagine if we had Jon Ossoff, AOC, James Talarico, Abdul El-Sayed, and our strongest Democratic communicators making face-to-camera videos every single day explaining exactly what's happening. "Here's the corruption we're investigating. Here's the evidence. Here's how we're going to stop it."
I think this is how you connect the dots in voters' minds between the way they vote and having a responsive government that's actually trying to address corruption and rewire the system.
Then we move to gerrymandering, affordability, paid family leave, and other reforms. Single-issue bill after single-issue bill, forcing Republicans to take public positions on these issues while Democrats communicate directly with the American people.
I know this might sound idealistic, but we already have the tools at our disposal. I see people like Talarico, AOC, and Ossoff pulling insane numbers on social media. There's no reason that same infrastructure can't be used to explain congressional investigations, proposed legislation, and exactly what Democrats are doing with the power voters gave them.
