Elizabeth (@RedElixier) header
Elizabeth (@RedElixier) profile picture

Modelling the universe 🌌

☁️Fata Morgana 🏰✨
Joined May 2020
Photo by Elizabeth (@RedElixier)Photo by Elizabeth (@RedElixier)Photo by Elizabeth (@RedElixier)Photo by Elizabeth (@RedElixier)Photo by Elizabeth (@RedElixier)Photo by Elizabeth (@RedElixier)Photo by Elizabeth (@RedElixier)Photo by Elizabeth (@RedElixier)Photo by Elizabeth (@RedElixier)Photo by Elizabeth (@RedElixier)
Orion spread across the sky A huntsman so inclined And I, strewn across your blackened breast Count the scatterlings of light While rest and madness Joined in flighty paradox Dance tomorrows into broken sight and loss
1
14
1,639
There is something about virtuosity which repels me. Where there is a focus on the performer, the skill, talent, originality or grandiosity of the execution in stead of letting the art or music speak for itself as an instance of deep and stirring consequence, something which quickens the soul, which drives the senses to a undeniable encounter with beauty and greatness that far exceeds any single performance or reception.
6
1
1
2
925
As this post seems to be rather unclear (judging from responses) it is not about the composer or the score, but about the performance of music. Whether I prefer to focus on the person performing or the music they are actually producing. I prefer to immerse myself in the sound, not the mechanisms that produce it.
22
We mark history with what we leave behind
Prompttopress.com Waiting on boxes for Vol. 1 "The X Artists" then the buttons go live for ordering. Not sure if we will even sell one of them but for the people who get one it will be a part of history. I have spun up many...MANY bots to scrub the internet for books like it and there are none! I am anxious to get it out there and for the remaining 98 copies to be in peoples hands. Not because i will make money (because i will certainly lose money ) but because it will be a permanent example of what we are all doing with AI art right now. A mark in art history... on paper. In a hard bound Smyth sewn book. 20 artists...I call them artists...who took the bet and sent me pics of what they are doing..they took a bet and now their art will out last them. @prompttopress
1
41
I took the first watch as you flickered hazily then bright horizon far yet gut-punch near Mirage and memory to once again appear Torchlight warm against the glass Smoke-tongued to stain my thoughts even here as I wait In a thousand defiances of fear and fate
🤖 Made with AI
49
Siegfried, by Thomas Theodor Heine (1921)
5
66
7
365
5,938
The problem i have with Klein bottles is that there is no grain (global orientation or a nowhere-zero vector field) that forces the vector. So energy will just pool in the most entropic part of the shape (Hairy Ball Theorem) This is part of my general gripe with GR. You can invent all sorts of fanciful shapes and effects, but thermodynamically it just doesn't work out... You can cheat time but not entropy. Entropy always wins. I think the clash between GR and Thermodynamics is actually worse thsn GR and QM
52
Broken thistles in the bloom And stray discourse Musing Time wrapped around And around Like old cellophane Colours fading Perhaps never there Grease-stain yellow windows Winking Watching I'll hum a song for you
🤖 Made with AI
48
Today Physical Superintelligence PBC is announcing a proof of the Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture, one of the central open problems in quantum complexity, with major implications for quantum computing speedup. psi.inc/research/aaronson-am… Thread 👇
45
Pressure and temperature are names for the effect of the phenomena not the cause or source of the phenomena itself Particles do not dissolve per se, they become the traceable histories of the smallest actions or work of the universe Limited observer is a dead end and a mythology. Only observance you need is of the quantum as "work being done". The only point of view that counts is that of the quantum. This POV is the only one that truly exist, as all and any other is only a massive compounding collection of it. Intelligence, consciousness, awareness, are all just different operating levels in the mind, and different predictive applications The digestive system is conscious, just as your whole body is and every single cell. Consciousness compounds into directed systems Anesthesia lowers the brain energy. There isn't enough energy for the normal conscious processes. Your brain is on standby and life support only. There is no active 'you'. The trauma is real. There is damage to the body. This is a massive energy deficit that remains after surgery. The body needs to heal
Pressure and temperature don’t really exist, says my guest, mathematician and physicist @getjonwithit. Look at water closely enough and there is just molecules bouncing around. We invented those properties because we can’t see individual molecules. Other key moments from our conversation: >A galaxy-sized intelligence wouldn’t know what we meant by “temperature.” It could track every particle. It would never need our equations. Jonathan thinks all of physics is like this, with space, time and particles dissolving at high enough resolution. >Relativity and quantum mechanics both came from one realization: the observer is part of the universe, under the same limits as the thing being measured. Once you ask what a limited observer would actually see, both theories become unavoidable. >Intelligence and consciousness may work against each other. Far more sensory data arrives than your brain can process one piece at a time. That’s why it batches that data (pain, pleasure, the color red etc). AI might become less sentient as it gets smarter, because it stops needing the shortcuts. >Jonathan says his digestive system is probably conscious. It has enough neurons to model the world and has the same bottleneck as the brain. It just can’t speak (reminded me of Michael Levin). >General anesthesia may not actually knock you out. As best we understand it, anesthesia makes you calm, paralyzed and unable to remember. It turns off the conscious part of you from the part that can report. This would explain why so many people have PTSD from surgery. Full interview below
51
Still going strong
1
187
Just a hair slower tempo than what I'm used to. Profound effect
Arcydzieło.♥️
1
2
52
After gauging peoples initial reactions, some of which genuinely made me laugh. Ill explain further. The word "observer" attempts to say "interaction", terribly. And it does so with implications attached that are genuinely out of place. Uncertainty attempts to say that an isolated particle's state is unresolved. All thats required to resolve its state IS ANOTHER PARTICLE. Not you, not me, not a mind. A simple interaction. Things remain resolved out of the "fields" as long as there is ongoing interactions for which those things remain resolved. Where there is "nothing" there is unresolved potential. An interaction within this space would have two particles "observe" each other, exchanging information. And then what does "exchange information" mean? It means that the interaction alters the state of the other, and the starting state, and ending state gives you information about tje other. Thats it! Thats exchanging information. Its such a simple concept(s) that are so poorly communicated that the general public truly get the wrong idea about what physics is trying to say. Im left wondering if some of it is intentionally that way to sound more mysterious.
6
2
22
1,020
In night and absinthe I disguised the growing storm of entropy Silken through the needle's eye this broken mire drank the flame of dripping sweet delusion And deep within the jaded glow sings the glassy edge Bitter madness and desire to tamed milky poisoned flow
🤖 Made with AI
2
2
86
When you solve a 3-body problem by geometric constraints
1
2
96
What I hate about relativity is the "outside observer" rubbish. There IS NO OUTSIDE OBSERVER. No one is observing or measuring or noticing at all. It's fantasy language that only obscures everything that's actually happening
3
3
422
The problem with quantum physics, is not it's insistence in what it is, but in what it is not
1
2
179
Tu aimeras ce que j’aime ...l’eau, les nuages, le silence et la nuit -Charles Baudelaire /Olli Kekäläinen
9
212
11
867
10,743
Ground-state binding of hydrogen is a parameter-free prediction! 🔥🔥🔥
35
A favourite
Caspar David Friedrich.
1
60