Replying to @WilliamShatner
Facebook is worse. AI can be a helpful tool when used responsibly. It can also be helpful, for example, for people with motor impairments to realize their ideas.
Replying to @Evelyn11987
Yes, I‘m with you. And the badgers are now doing this anonymously, which means we can't find the accounts to report them.
Wenn ich in einem Supermarkt arbeite und die Grünen nicht mag, darf ich nicht einfach aus der privaten Einstellung heraus den Einkauf von Anton Hofreiter verweigern oder andere Politiker dieser Partei. Als Angestellte habe ich nicht das Recht diese Entscheidung zu treffen.
Ich habe auch die Überzeugung, die AFD nicht zu wählen. Wenn ich aber ein Unternehmen hätte, würde ich dennoch meine Ware nicht verweigern.
Replying to @AlpenHofnarr @HMueller_567
Man muss nicht mit der AFD sympathisieren, um so eine Entscheidung zu treffen. Manchmal geht es einfach nur ums Prinzip. BMW geht auch Verträge ein mit sozialistischen Parteien wie die Grünen oder Linken. Da gibt es dann plötzlich keine Hemmschwelle mehr.
Sie sind doch konform gegangen, indem der Vertrag rückgängig gemacht wurde. Da braucht also nichts ausgetauscht werden.
Replying to @ernsterjuenger
Halte die Menschen „dumm“, dann lassen sie sich leicht regieren. Dann noch Drogen legalisieren, damit sie nicht mehr merken, dass sie bevormundet werden.
#JamesSpader #Impersonation
The same woman we had previously warned not to get involved with these imposters. Here, she’s replying to the same fake account where the perpetrator is posing as “James Spader.”
Try to make sense of this gibberish, we certainly can’t. Her comments are often so rambling and convoluted that we almost get the impression she’s a social media bot or a fake fan meant to make the profiles seem credible. Or maybe she doesn't even realize anymore what she's putting on.
#JamesSpader #ScamNetwork
#ReddingtonProject #Impersonation
Today we’re showing you an example of an incorrigible fan who has made it her mission to lure these scammers into a trap through communication.
Unfortunately, this happens quite often because these women still believe they’re dealing with a foolish scammer. But that’s a mistake we warn against time and again.
Behind many of these profiles lies a fully-fledged, well-organized fraud network. These profiles aren’t managed by just one person.
And they often operate internationally, from Nigeria, the Philippines, India, and other regions. Behind them are IT professionals who hack their victims’ accounts (as shown in this screenshot example), create victim profiles, collect data and photos, and use them for additional fake accounts or sell them in the Darknet.
But what do these women see at first glance? A person with lots of spelling mistakes, poor grammar, and absurd stories. Are these scammers really as stupid as they seem?
NO!!! It’s all part of their tactic to target a specific category of victims. Anyone who overlooks such mistakes is easily susceptible to the scam. Anyone who notices the mistakes and doesn’t let themselves be misled gets blocked by them.
And yes, the scammers also notice when a “fan” is just playing games with them or trying to lure them into a trap. That, too, is logged in their system.
And then they turn the tables. Just like with this woman who ended up getting hacked. Anyone who thinks the fight against fraud is just a game will end up becoming a victim themselves. If the VIP scam doesn’t work, then comes the sad story of why they’re scamming in the first place.
And that’s why we’re urging everyone here who believes they can distract scammers from their schemes through chats to realize that this simply isn’t the case. Let go of the misconception that these con artists are just petty, stupid idiots.
Because the truth is, these scammers consider those who think they can lure them into a trap to be the real idiots. Behind the seemingly unintelligent facade, there is actually a person with psychological knowledge at work.
That's not always the case, but everyone should keep this in mind and find other ways to combat fraud. And the best way is to stay informed, educate, and, above all, remain “anonymous.”
Replying to @DRichar45109829 @_meinereiner_
Bei einer Marktkette entscheidet nicht der einzelne Markt. Sie müssen sich daran halten, was die Zentrale anordnet.
#JamesSpader #Impersonation
Meta reactivates more fake accounts. How is it possible that fraudulent accounts that were suspended are now back online, ready to carry out their shady dealings? Facebook is becoming increasingly negligent. This situation is gradually bordering on outrage. A company is actively facilitating identity theft here.
🤖 Made with AI
Elijah spader
- 61567258410165 -
➡️ #JamesSpader
➡️ #Impersonation
➡️ #ReddingtonProject
Please report this fake account:
facebook.com/profile.php?id=…
🤖 Made with AI
James spader Officials
- 61590448181458 -
➡️ #JamesSpader
➡️ #Impersonation
➡️ #ReddingtonProject
Please report this fake account:
facebook.com/profile.php?id=…
🤖 Made with AI
Replying to @KMalotczeck @ernsterjuenger
Und wenn keine Patienten mehr kommen, werden diese Ärzte Gutachter für LaGeSo oder andere Institutionen und verdienen gut daran, kranken Menschen den GdB oder den Pflegegrad zu verwehren durch völlig absurde Berichte und Gefälligkeitsgutachten.
Replying to @Redounette63 @andymstone
It's possible because Meta isn't doing anything to stop the scammers. The press spokesperson may like to talk a big game, but in reality, they aren't actually doing anything about it. Just take a look at all the fake accounts belonging to Austin Miller, Kerem Bikmaz, Stephen Townsend, or other actors like Tom Ellis, Simon Baker, Mark Harmon, and Shemar Moore. These fake profiles are popping up like mushrooms. But what Meta does love to do is remove the profiles of those who fight against fraud. After all, we’re hurting their ad revenue.
Replying to @Redounette63
The difference between you and the scam accounts is that the profiles on these scam networks are a major source of revenue for Meta. The company profits alongside the criminals. In that sense, this social media platform is complicit (aiding and abetting).






