“Do not be deceived, Wormwood. Our cause is never more in danger than when a human, no longer desiring, but still intending, to do our Enemy's will, looks round upon a universe from which every trace of Him seems to have vanished, and asks why he has been forsaken, yet obeys.”
lol. Since the when? ⏰⏰⏰🤣
The Church has been in schism since the mid twentieth century. People are only now realising it.
There is the Catholic Church, which rose from Sacred Tradition, with the deposit of faith, celebrating the Mass of the Ages.
Then there is the New Order, which sometimes goes by Holocaustianity, replacing Tradition with novelty, so subtly most people do not notice until it is too late. Like a frog in increasingly boiling water. High altars gone, nave tables in, the Sacrifice gets demoted to a Jewish meal. They revert to the passover which was fulfilled in Christ; the Mass of the Ages is suppressed; prayerful posture such as kneeling and receiving communion on the tongue is discouraged; homosexuality and women in positions of leadership is encouraged, by act if not decree; universal language of the Church is replaced with a thousand vernacular dialects; good priests are silenced, their obedience weaponised, whilst bad bishops are promoted, the very ones who push lgbtq; the catechism is infected with just enough vagueness and ambiguity to sow confusion.
The Church cannot change her teaching. Yet, the New Order will be quiet on issues they should speak out on, and vocal on issues they should remain quiet on. The New Order hierarchy uses enough abstractions to make it seem like the Church has “modernised,” where she cannot and should not. From the mass migration of Mohammedans, to the death penalty.
Modernism is the enemy of the Catholic Church, and the fruit of the New Order.
Lefebvre’s warnings were prophetic.
IS IT TIME TO PUSH BACK AGAINST THE NORMALISATION OF MISANDRY?
Across Australia, Britain, America, Canada and other English-speaking societies, contempt for men and boys has become disturbingly acceptable in parts of our culture.
Man-bashing is marketed as empowerment. Male incompetence is entertainment. Masculinity is portrayed as toxic. And prejudice against males is too often excused as humour, feminism or social justice.
Some writers, performers and commentators have built commercially successful brands around provocative criticism of men. Publishers, broadcasters and entertainment platforms have helped bring these messages to large audiences.
Consider 20 examples spanning explicit misandry, provocative titles, male-directed ridicule and contested portrayals of masculinity:
1. Clementine Ford — Boys Will Be Boys, I Don't, and notorious jokes about killing men.
2. Pauline Harmange — I Hate Men, explicitly defending misandry.
3. Suzanna Danuta Walters — "Why Can't We Hate Men?", published in The Washington Post.
4. Blythe Roberson — How to Date Men When You Hate Men.
5. Mona Eltahawy — The Seven Necessary Sins for Women and Girls, including provocative rhetoric about violence.
6. Kathy Lette — Men: A User's Guide, featuring male-directed stereotypes.
7. Sabrina Carpenter — "Manchild" and Man's Best Friend, commercially successful male-incompetence satire.
8. Kate Manne — Entitled: How Male Privilege Hurts Women.
9. Hannah Gadsby — Nanette and controversial commentary about supposedly "good men".
10. Chelsea Handler — Commercial comedy frequently ridiculing men.
11. Amy Schumer — Gender-based stereotypes in Inside Amy Schumer.
12. Katherine Ryan — Stand-up comedy about male shortcomings.
13. Iliza Shlesinger — Comedy featuring male-female stereotypes.
14. Michelle Wolf — Provocative gender and sexual satire.
15. Ashnikko — "STUPID", "Daisy" and aggressive anti-patriarchal imagery.
16. Eliza Clark — Boy Parts, a novel featuring female objectification and violence against men.
17. Michael Flood — Academic research on masculinity, male violence and gender relations.
18. Laurie Penny — Bitch Doctrine and Sexual Revolution.
19. Jessica Valenti — Commercial feminist commentary on male entitlement and political power.
20. Chidera Eggerue — How to Get Over a Boy and relationship-focused feminist branding.
These examples are not equivalent. Some involve explicit hostility towards men; others involve satire, fictional characters, structural criticism or legitimate challenges to harmful behaviour.
But we must ask some uncomfortable questions.
What happens when boys repeatedly hear that masculinity is defective? When fathers and husbands are routinely ridiculed? When male vulnerability is dismissed? When schools approach boys primarily as potential perpetrators rather than young people deserving encouragement?
Such messages are undermining relationships, parenting, educational engagement, mutual respect and boys' self-worth...
Equality must mean rejecting sexism in BOTH directions.
We should celebrate positive masculinity, responsible fatherhood, healthy relationships and the inherent dignity of every boy and man.
Are English-speaking societies finally ready to challenge misandry with the same seriousness that we challenge misogyny?
#Misandry #MensRights #BoysMatter #PositiveMasculinity #GenderEquality
Talk to me about empathy as international policy. Consider that at your table is both the Shiek of Saudi Arabia, the Emperor/Presidente of China, the Strong Man/Czar of Russia, and the Kingpin of the Mexicali Cartels.
Mirroring is wicked.
A very disturbing trait of narcissists, typically those with strong envy and psychopathic tendencies, is their ability to mimic the people they envy while simultaneously trying to destroy them. Often called mirroring, where a narcissist mimics someone else's personality, mannerisms, interests, and even life choices. This isn’t done out of admiration but rather out of a need to consume that person’s identity and then replace them. It’s almost like psychological identity theft. At the same time, they seek to undermine the original person through gaslighting, lies, and smear campaigns. They attack the very person they are copying, trying to break their confidence and make them question their own identity. By eliminating the original they ”take ownership” of the traits they are mimicking. It is profoundly disturbing when you witness someone doing this to you.
“Choose your side!”
🔴BREAKING: Attorney Peter W.H. Stassen receives a hero’s welcome outside the District Court of the Northern Netherlands following the substantive hearing on the merits which took place today.
“They know we have crucial evidence that the whole Covid-19 narrative is fake”
Expert witnesses Sasha Latypova and Dr Joseph Sansone, as well as claimant Reggie Dijkstra offer their reflections of the day’s events.
@sasha_latypova @PhdSansone
🚨🚨 THE ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK / THE DEMOCRACY FILES: A PRIMER 🚨
I will be using this thread to track all drops, so bookmark it.
I spent most of yesterday backing everything (now 312 gigabytes) up in various sources and getting the materials out to others. I also produced an AI video (below) to explain the whole thing to others are not on 𝕏 - feel free to distribute.
Here's the primer:
USAID, the foreign aid agency, had a democracy office. Inside the agency, it was called DRG.
Officially, DRG administered "democracy assistance." They'd go inside countries they thought were sliding into authoritarianism and help the opposition there. That assistance included election monitoring, judicary support, independent media, and civil society building.
You may have heard the term "color revolution." The model comes from Serbia in 2000, where trained student activists brought down Milosevic with the help of Western governments, after sustained protests. With the help of USAID's democracy office, this model was implemented in many other countries to topple governments: Georgia's "Rose Revolution" in 2003, Ukraine's "Orange Revolution" in 2004, and many more.
Then last year, DOGE shut down USAID. But the USAID democracy office didn't stop. They formed a group called the Democracy Renewal Group, the same initials as their office (USAID Democracy, Human Rights, Governance). Their goal: apply their own playbook to the United States itself.
This goal became a plan, called Renew American Democracy (RAD). It invoked the "4 B's" framework. Block - use lawfare and protests to make life harder for the Trump administration. Bridge & Belong - control dialogue and win people over. The final and most important B is Build. Build means redesigning the American government itself, and the crisis is the opening.
In their own words:
"We can take that breakdown moment and leverage it for a big structural reform, you know, refounding moment." - Danielle Reiff, DRG lead.
Calls show DRG working alongside DSA on ideas of creating a different government, one that does away with the Constitution itself.
DRG does not run the Block operations. They hand it to UDA, the United Democracy Alliance. One organizer calls it a "huge galaxy": lawsuits, street protests, non-cooperation. They list No Kings, Indivisible, MoveOn, 50501, and many other mega-activist NGOs among their members.
Another organizer calls UDA Erica Chenoweth's project. Chenoweth is the Harvard professor behind the three-and-half-percent rule of regime change: get that share of a country's populace onto the streets, and historically, the movement wins.
The UDA is very "hush-hush." They have no website, no roster, no filings.
Then come the red lines: things the Trump administration could do, such as calling the Insurrection Act on protesters, that would mean that the federal government, in their words, "crosses the threshold into illegitimacy." Nobody voted on those lines. There was no public debate. These red lines were developed within secretive working groups, and in a paper addressed to governors and staff.
In the words of Reiff/DRG:
"So that if there is a red line crossed in terms of a Constitutional crisis, like everyone's already pre-organized. And so Mike Smith actually said, he goes, oh, you guys have the day after tomorrow plan."
Cross a line, and the paper's options include states refusing to lend their resources to federal officials, and governors convening what it calls a "Third Continential Congress."
Running the UDA's Insurrection Act working group: Rear Admiral Mike Smith (RET) of National Security Leaders of America (NSL4A). NSL4A is also credited with operationalizing UDA, the blocking operations. NSL4A consists of about 1,600 ex-officers, spies, diplomats. They're turning red lines into indicators and running a situation room to monitor them throughout the midterms and beyond.
The NSL4A's lawyers told them to stop recording meetings in case of subpoenas. But the rest of the network continued to record. DRG works in conjunction with Renew to Thrive (R2T), which ended up accidentally publishing 400+ calls and thousands of documents. These calls and documents were never meant for our eyes, but it's them, on tape.
Thousands of NGOs and billions of dollars are involved in this endeavor. Most of them believe they're saving democracy. The problem is that people who spent their careers deciding when other countries' governments had lost their legitimacy wrote that test for ours, in private, and planned for what comes after.
Who decides when your government is legitimate?
सऊदी अरब में बांग्लादेश के दंपति का सर कलम करके मौत की सजा देने के बाद उनके शव बांग्लादेश पहुंच गए जिसका अंतिम संस्कार कर दिया गया
पता चल रहा है कि उन दोनों की एक 8 साल की बेटी भी है जो अब अनाथ हो गई
अब जाकर बांग्लादेश के दंपति की मौत की सजा के मामले पर पूरी घटनाक्रम सऊदी अरब ने सामने रखा है
बांग्लादेश का एक दंपति जो पति-पत्नी थे वह उमरा करने सऊदी अरब गए
मक्का की एक मस्जिद में उन्होंने नमाज अदा किया और भाव विभोर होकर एक दूसरे से गले लग गए और एक दूसरे को kiss कर लिया
और यह सब करते हुए उनकी आंखों में आंसू थे जाहिर सी बात है कि उनका एक सपना पूरा हुआ था कि वह उमरा पर आए हैं तो यह उन्होंने किसी अश्लीलता की वजह से नहीं किया था बल्कि भाव विभोर होकर किया था
और एक पाकिस्तानी ने उनका वीडियो बनाकर वायरल कर दिया और उनका सर कलम हो गया
ये जो सोच है ना कि दो लोगों के एक दुसरे को चूमने से खुदा नाराज हो जाएगा और गर्दन काटने से खुश हो जाएगा यही कट्टरपंथ की सबसे बड़ी बीमारी है।
एक तरफ कहते हो इस्लाम अमन का मजहब है, दूसरी तरफ एक रील, एक चुंबन पर सर कलम?
मक्का की मस्जिद क्या इबादत की जगह है या तुम्हारे अहंकार का कत्लगाह?
अगर खुदा इतना ही कमजोर है कि दो लोगों के प्यार से उसकी मस्जिद नापाक हो जाती है, तो फिर वो खुदा कैसा? खुदा को तुम्हारी तलवार की जरूरत क्यों है अपनी हिफाजत के लिए?
तुमने दो लोगों को नहीं मारा, तुमने ये साबित किया है कि तुम्हारी सोच आज भी 7वीं सदी के रेगिस्तान में ही अटकी हुई है।
जहाँ प्यार गुनाह है और कत्ल इंसाफ।
और फिर कहते हो दुनिया इस्लामोफोबिक है - दुनिया तुम्हारे इस कृत्य से डरती है, तुम्हारे मजहब से नहीं।
बेटी अनाथ हो गई, दो परिवार खत्म, और तुम्हें लगा तुमने धर्म बचा लिया? तुमने धर्म नहीं, अपनी दरिंदगी का प्रदर्शन किया है।
#SaudiArabia #BangladeshiCouple
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The video is from May 2026 and depicts a girl at her father's funeral in an unrelated context, not connected to the two Bangladeshis executed in Saudi Arabia for an indecent act in a mosque.
khaleejtimes.com/world/gulf/sau…
x.com/ab12o3/status/…
This is exciting.
The NSA has warned over two critical PHP security flaws that could put websites worldwide at risk, telling organizations to take affected systems offline if they cannot be secured immediately.
Belgium's foreign ministry temporarily pulled its websites following reports of cyberattacks exploiting the PHP vulnerability. The Centre for Cybersecurity Belgium has recorded no attacks on Belgian websites.
Japan PM Takaichi urged checking whether sites use PHP and applying the fix patch.
CISA: no observed exploitation, but the flaws pose a risk to unpatched organizations.
We’ve acquired Orchestra Bio, a platform that helps biopharma teams coordinate the complex process of drug development.
Together, we’ll build on Rosalind, our AI models and tools for life sciences research, to streamline those operations and help new treatments reach patients sooner.
Welcome @ashokaraj_ and team!
openai.com/index/openai-to-a…




























