You cannot vibe science. Unlike coding, there is no objective test to assess whether science has been done ‘correctly’. 1/5
Through this, we've come to believe that building transparency into these tools at their base is key to keeping the foundations of science solid, and above all, safe. 4/5
Read more about it on our blog here: lnkd.in/eutjYYq5 5/5
Harry Rickerby retweeted
Our first partnership – with @brieflybio! It enables liquid handling for scientists with zero automation experience.
We decided to partner after seeing their demo, where it only took a molecular biologist 1-2 minutes (not days!) to set up a liquid handling block.
Why can't AI turn human protocols and methods into lab automation? 🤖
I dig into this more in a new post, as well as our thoughts on what can be done to help. Check it out below 👇
open.substack.com/pub/briefl…
Spending a lot of time translating scientists' workflows into automated ones?
Check out @brieflybio's interface that flexibly converts text-based protocols into automation-ready ones. Here's an example for the @Biosero ecosystem.
Come see us at @SLAS_Org for a demo!
Here's a little peak into our new interface to take text-based protocols, structure them, and adapt them to the constraints of an automated system.
Come chat to us @brieflybio at our booth at @SLAS_Org if you're interested :)
Spend a lot of time making plate maps?
We hooked up our plate mapper to our AI copilot in @Briefly. It’s pretty fun.
Harry Rickerby retweeted
Using @NotionHQ as your lab notebook?
You can embed your Briefly protocols like this 🫰✨
We have a Christmas present for you 🎁
@brieflybio is now free and open to academics.
Sign up below 👇
We want to make that collaboration easier. It could be sharing a complete protocol for an optimised method, or sharing your research portfolio so others can get inspired.