Just as I thought I'd hung up my fur-lined manacles... the saucy sexpert rides again. With thanks to the @DailyMail Femail team for making me look unrecognisably glamorous. Yes, I stand by every word.
Goodness me. This story reminds me of Ruth Lawrence when she was still a teen. She was a member of the SCR at St Hugh's when I started there in 1987 and many feared her father was overseeing her every move. I'm so glad she escaped parental control, had a family and flourishing academic life.
I think this is sad and I suspect she is still being controlled by her father with whom we had some interesting dealings when she was walking across America to the Climate Summit in Chilè in 2019.
He asked us if Maiden would wait for her in LA and take her as she would not fly. As we were heading that way on our tour and would only have to delay our schedule for a couple of weeks we glady agreed. I thought she was inspirational.
Then the unrest happened and the summit was moved to Madrid, Spain.
Her father said he had found a yacht on the East Coast (USA) but needed a Skipper - could I reommend someone? So I did and she then took them across the Atlantic.
I didn't realise and she told me later......... she was in the UK at the time and so they 'flew her from UK to the USA' so that Greta could 'sail' to the summit'.
Doh! That is when reality kicked in.
I do worry about her though.
One for @PersephoneBooks
My favourite publisher @PersephoneBooks is opening a new bookshop - a London home for its legions of fans in the old Pollock's Toy Museum, where many of us spent happy hours as children (my uncle Malcolm Goldsworthy even sourced toys for it).
We have some news. This autumn we are opening a second Persephone bookshop – in London, in Fitzrovia to be precise. We had not actually been planning this, but by chance we heard about a 1767 four-storey house that had become available... More info here: persephonebooks.co.uk/blogs/…
Just to say to friends that @ahistoryinart is the most consistently uplifting person I follow here on X and I urge you to follow him too. Fresh treasure and insights every day.
I wish with all my heart ignorant people would stop trying to use Christopher Hitchens as a stick to beat his brother. Do they not understand loss and grief? Both brothers were and are remarkable.
My letter in this week’s @Spectator, especially for fanboys of my late brother.
It's astonishing that supposedly intelligent people can't comprehend that a newly-published hardback sold at half-price is a clear sign of a best seller. Patrick Radden Keefe's London Falling is half-price on Amazon, as is Charles Spencer's Swan Song. I ordered copies of both.
Inevitable.
This article reflects something I’ve been talking about for a while. When a diagnosis is used as a way to decide who gets access to resources or not, then this is going to result in inequality.
That’s because those who can afford to pay for a diagnosis and those who understand the system will get their diagnoses more quickly. This will then enable them to access public services more quickly. Those who cannot afford to pay or who do not understand the system will be left behind on a long waiting list, or maybe won’t even get that far.
There is no blame attached to this observation. It’s not an attack. Of course parents will do whatever they can to help their children, and if they have the resources to pay privately many of them will do that. But if we have a system where public services are dependent on a diagnosis, and that diagnosis can be obtained more quickly if you pay, then we are going to end up with the most affluent people receiving most services. This is a side effect of the burgeoning market in private diagnostic assessments which has sprung up over the last fifteen years.
As a society, we need to look clearly at what is happening and decide whether this is the best way to allocate public resources. theguardian.com/society/2026…
Everyone should read this deeply troubling, Kafkaesque story. A fractured system does not work.
Good old Bill Bryson.
With the heroes of the @RNLI under attack again, I’m reminded of this passage from Bill Bryson.

ALT I had never really stopped to consider what an extraordinary thing the Royal National Lifeboat Institution is. Think about it. A troubled ship calls for help, and eight people - teachers, plumbers, the guy who runs the pub - drop everything and put to sea, whatever the weather, asking no questions, imperilling their own lives, to try to help strangers. Is there anything more brave and noble than that? The RNLI - I looked this up later - is an organization run by volunteers, supported entirely by public donations. It maintains 233 stations around the coast of Britain and averages twenty-two call-outs per day. It saves 350 lives a year on average.
Very good piece by @spicerlife on mid-life grief and anger. "Don't leave a sarcastic confrontational comment, I would tell myself, while leaving a sarcastic confrontational comment." dailymail.com/lifestyle/fitn…
Confession: I do not much like Renoir. If I was going to give one absurdly famous artist a miss, it might be him. I would pay good money to have someone remove Coco Reading from my gaze.
Amused to see every single male writer of my generation hailing the new de Gaulle film as a masterpiece. Feels a bit like that moment when every single woman I knew was telling her mates to watch Bad Sisters on Apple. (Mind you, I will watch the de Gaulle, but couldn't get my best beloved to watch Bad Sisters.)
Just awful that this can happen.
Glad to see this story being given the coverage it deserves. Not least because @pcaruanagalizia, Daphne’s son, was Tortoise’s star reporter for many years. But more importantly because it’s a morality tale of where political corruption leads: to murder & impunity in the very heart of Europe.
Brilliant insect-championing conservationist Bridget Nicholls of legendary @Pestival is trying to stop @Rentokil revoking her trademark. They deny it here, but they sent her a notice in June announcing their intention to do just that - she's spent her savings fighting them. Shame on you, Rentokil. Great piece by @Telegraph. Think I told you about this @horton_official and @Feargal_Sharkey telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/09…
Astonishing story, which I'm ashamed to say I didn't know. I've checked the details with the RCP's historical records and found out her entire life story was riveting. My new heroine.
Doctors X-rayed pregnant women routinely in the 1950s to check which way round the baby was lying. Nobody thought it was dangerous.
Alice Stewart noticed childhood leukaemia rising sharply in Britain and set out to find why. She and her team interviewed the mothers of 1,400 children who had died of cancer, and 1,400 mothers whose children were alive, and asked them the same questions.
The pattern showed up in the first 35 pairs. Children who had died were about twice as likely to have been X-rayed in the womb, and a single scan at the dose used then appeared to be enough.
She published in 1956, and the response was outrage. Radiation was the technology of the future in the 1950s, and the claim that a low dose could cause cancer years later contradicted what the entire medical and nuclear establishment believed. Her methods were attacked. Her funding suffered. Doctors carried on X-raying pregnant women.
It took roughly 25 years for the medical world to come round. Pregnant women were still routinely X-rayed into the late 1970s. Two decades after she told them to stop. She retired in 1974 and did her most contested work afterwards, in her seventies, examining the health records of American nuclear weapons workers. Her findings there were unwelcome enough that the Department of Energy cut off her access to the data. She spent 14 years fighting them and testified before Congress, and in 1990 the records were opened to independent researchers.
She died in 2002, aged 95. The children who were never X-rayed have no idea who she was.
history.rcp.ac.uk/blog/alice…
This feels about right.
Why can’t we instead be honest about what ADHD is—and what it is not—as psychiatrist @awaisaftab is here, in an @nytimes article from earlier this year?
Why the insistence on presenting it as an established neurological issue and confusing people?
nytimes.com/2026/05/11/opini…
Blimey. The commenters here on X vehemently disagree with me. What's so awful about staying friends with an ex? Some think it's a red flag, but I think it's a sign you don't hold grudges.
'When I married my husband three decades ago, the guest list was sprinkled with exes. Apparently, this makes us outliers in modern Britain'
‘Young people have been brainwashed into following a zero-contact policy after a breakup, which is reframed as setting healthy boundaries'
But @RowanPelling argues that 'keeping exes in the fold is the ultimate sign of maturity.' Here's why ⬇️
telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/08…





















