Ry Brooks

I've spent a great deal of time going through @DataRepublican's incredible work here, so I thought I'd drop an easy-to-understand primer. Your life is a mistake if you're not following this woman! The Illegitimacy Playbook: A Simple Primer A group of people who spent their careers deciding when other countries’ governments were no longer legitimate just decided to run the same playbook at home. After USAID got shut down, the democracy office didn’t go away. It rebranded, kept the same initials, and started treating the United States like one of the countries it used to “help.” Most of the people involved still think they’re the heroes. The recordings show they also spent a lot of time privately writing the rules for when the current government stops being legitimate and sketching what should replace it. Convenient. Where This Comes From - USAID had a democracy office called DRG. Its official job was helping other countries with elections, courts, media, and activist groups. - The approach came from Serbia in 2000 and was later used in places like Georgia and Ukraine. - After USAID was closed, the same people formed the Democracy Renewal Group (still DRG). Their new goal is to apply that model inside the United States through a project called Renew American Democracy. The Plan in Plain English - Block: lawsuits, protests, and refusal to cooperate aimed at the Trump administration. - Bridge and Belong: control the conversation and try to win people over. - Build: use any crisis as the chance to redesign how American government works. They call it a “refounding moment.” - One of the main people, Danielle Reiff, has said they can take a breakdown and turn it into major structural reform. The recordings also show work with DSA-aligned groups on ideas that go beyond the current Constitution. Who Handles the Protests and Lawsuits - DRG does not run the daily protests and legal fights. That job goes to a secretive group called the United Democracy Alliance (UDA). - UDA is described as a large network that includes No Kings, Indivisible, MoveOn, 50501, and many other big activist groups. It has no public website, member list, or normal filings. - One organizer says UDA is Erica Chenoweth’s project. Chenoweth is the Harvard professor known for the idea that mobilizing about 3.5 percent of the population can topple a government. - A group of roughly 1,600 former military officers, intelligence officials, and diplomats called National Security Leaders of America (led by retired Rear Admiral Mike Smith) is credited with actually running the operational side. They track “red lines” and run a situation room. Their lawyers told them to stop recording meetings because of subpoena risk. Other people in the network kept recording anyway. DRG works with a group called Renew to Thrive, which accidentally published hundreds of calls and thousands of documents. The Private Red Lines - Working groups quietly wrote their own rules for when the federal government has crossed into illegitimacy. Invoking the Insurrection Act against protesters is one of the examples they discuss most. - These rules were not voted on or debated in public. - Their plans for what comes next include states refusing to help federal officials and governors calling a “Third Continental Congress.” - The idea is that everyone is already organized so the response is ready the moment they decide a red line has been crossed. Who Actually Decides When to Move - The mid-level groups are not the ones making the final call on mass mobilization. - The files point to a group called the Election Safeguards Response Network (ESRN) as the one that decides when to activate the larger alliance. - That trail leads to Norm Eisen. ESRN is funded under an organization called State Democracy Defenders Action. - Eisen is described as sitting on several important levers and functioning as a key decision-maker, though the posts say he is part of a small, still-hidden group of elites rather than acting alone. The Bottom Line - Thousands of organizations and billions of dollars are involved. Most people in the network believe they are saving democracy. - The same people who spent decades deciding when foreign governments had lost legitimacy wrote the test for the United States in private and planned what comes after. Put it all together and the picture is straightforward. A network built by people who specialized in regime change abroad has spent the last couple of years quietly preparing the same toolkit for use at home. They defined their own private red lines for when the federal government becomes illegitimate, pre-organized the protests and legal fights, lined up former national security officials to run the operations, and sketched plans for what a replacement government should look like. The people at the top of the hierarchy decide when the moment has arrived. Everyone else is told they are defending democracy. The recordings just happen to show them talking about structural reform, a new founding, and the conditions under which the current system no longer counts. That is the primer.