@RyadsReport
Account based inUnited States
About this account
- Account based in
- United States
- Connected via
- United States App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Live on Youtube every week w/ Myron covering Current events. https://xitter.cf/t.co/joy3W8tFhq
Joined January 2022
- Tweets399
- Following174
- Followers12K
- Likes4K
Ryad retweeted
🚨STOP lifting for bi***es ‼️
Myron and Ryad giving young men the reality check they need
Ryad retweeted
♦️Myron shares how proud he is of his little brother Ryad!❤️
“I’m so happy for him! He’s brilliant, he’s smart, he backs me up, there’s no one I would rather have in my corner!”
Ryad retweeted
J’ai entendu dire que la France était finie, qu’il était trop tard pour la sauver.
Mais la France est toujours aussi belle, enviable même. Sa grandeur n’a pas disparu, elle ne demande qu’à renaître.
Nous avons surmonté en un an un problème cent fois plus grave, sans avoir les moyens dont dispose la France.
La France pourrait y arriver en une semaine.
Ryad retweeted
♦️Ryad shows off his crazy shoulder pump after trying Myron’s insane workout routine!😳
WHAT DO WE HAVE HERE? LMAO
TMZ obtained a text chain between Jonathan Newell and Jane Doe. On the evening of October 21, 2024, Jonathan apologizes to Jane and says, "You're an amazing person and I genuinely hope ur not catching as much heat from this as we r. We've been shutting down any stories we've heard but again I'm so so sorry."
I tweeted this two weeks ago. Perhaps what is happening to Mamdani currently, is symbolic of this issue.
Abdul El Sayed will likely win his general, but this is something I’ve noticed.
A big weakness of DSA/far left candidates is their inability to deflect guilt tripping Holocaust rhetoric, which significantly weakens their anti Israel position. It gives their opponents a rhetorical weapon they can consistently use to degrade and soften their stance.
Simply put, when you’re constantly on your heels apologizing rather than standing firmly behind your position, you make it incredibly easy for your enemies to take an axe to your ideology.
Perhaps it’s subconscious, but I think part of the reason Netanyahu feels comfortable name dropping someone like Hasan Piker is because Piker himself polices others for “antisemitism,” giving that accusation rhetorical utility. He locates the problem specifically in Israel and Zionism while rejecting broader attacks on Jews.
So long as these DSA types continue labeling people like Nick and my brother “antisemites,” they create a boundary between their own anti Zionism and actual analysis of the problem. In practice, that can make them a buffer against voices that reject that distinction entirely.
The far right does not have this issue and calls it for what it is.
Ryad retweeted
♦️Ryad recaps the great escape from the University of Texas as angry students chased Myron!😳🫣
“It was like out of the movie! They chased the car like some angry mob! I’d be lying if I said I’m not nervous when sh*t like that happens.. These kids have ill intent!”
Netanyahu had advance intelligence warning of a major Hamas attack before October 7.
What’s worse? The people you occupy fighting you, or your own leader receiving intelligence that they’re preparing to attack, refusing to stop it, and then using the aftermath to justify a disproportionate retaliation.
Now that retaliation has expanded to Iran, helping turn the entire Middle East upside down in Israel’s favor, all with American backing and support.
When will men realize white knighting behavior like this is repulsive to women.
In a year he is going to look back at this video in embarrassment, like the BLM advocates who look back at the videos of themselves bowing down to black people.
Just like the Clancy case, isn’t it alarming that this Cornell story is even as controversial as it is? Concerning times await us, or perhaps we are already living through them.
The headline paints this grotesque, unnerving picture. However, upon basic inspection, the story is not what it’s cracked up to be of course. The truth typically lies in the fine print, but in this case, the subheader alone raises questions leading you to logical conclusions.
In addition, any guy going even slightly against the grain is ridiculed and berated. It is disgusting how powerful we let these girls get, and what is even more disgusting, is how fearful men are of the response.
Abdul El Sayed will likely win his general, but this is something I’ve noticed.
A big weakness of DSA/far left candidates is their inability to deflect guilt tripping Holocaust rhetoric, which significantly weakens their anti Israel position. It gives their opponents a rhetorical weapon they can consistently use to degrade and soften their stance.
Simply put, when you’re constantly on your heels apologizing rather than standing firmly behind your position, you make it incredibly easy for your enemies to take an axe to your ideology.
Perhaps it’s subconscious, but I think part of the reason Netanyahu feels comfortable name dropping someone like Hasan Piker is because Piker himself polices others for “antisemitism,” giving that accusation rhetorical utility. He locates the problem specifically in Israel and Zionism while rejecting broader attacks on Jews.
So long as these DSA types continue labeling people like Nick and my brother “antisemites,” they create a boundary between their own anti Zionism and actual analysis of the problem. In practice, that can make them a buffer against voices that reject that distinction entirely.
The far right does not have this issue and calls it for what it is.
Abdul El-Sayed on Israel-Palestine:
I understand on both sides of this debate, we're also dealing with a lot of trauma. A lot of trauma.
I understand that for a lot of Jewish Americans, there's the trauma of the Holocaust and the need to have a refuge. I understand that.
And I also understand that for a lot of Palestinian Americans and Palestinians everywhere, there's the trauma of the Nakba.
We've got to be able to create the circumstances within which both of these deeply traumatized people can have a conversation built on principle. But to me, the answer has to be principle. It has to be.