Shaikh Abdus Samad retweeted
On Evals - getting messages on “ok so how do I actually start learning this?”
there is no better way than by just doing so you can copy this to Claude Code and get started today
<instructions>
1. Go look up the @harborframework and the Terminal Bench 2.0 dataset. Go look up the Harbor Skills GitHub repo for help. Pick 1 Task in the dataset and explain every single piece that’s in that task folder
2. Explain what my agent sees when it does the task, what it has to output, and how we know if it got the problem right?
3. Now let’s actually run a Task using the built in Claude Code integration, it’s just a flag
4. Once that’s done let’s read the ATIF file that was produced together and help me understand what just happened. Did we pass the task? If not can we dig into why it failed? Go check the verifier logic to see what went wrong.
5. Ok let’s try to improve our agent by adjusting the prompt. And let’s rerun on a few tasks? Is this helping?
6. Ok we’re doing evals! Using this same format, help me make my own. Let’s do this together
…
</instructions>
Spend a few days reading a bunch of traces, actually running evals, understanding traces, internalizing agent failure modes, and being super in the loop of what the agent sees and does
Have fun! Evals are super important, they don’t have to be scary. DM if I can help or just tweet out what you’re doing, someone will help I promise, we’re all learning
Was he the candidate or the interviewer?
Personal update: I've joined Anthropic. I think the next few years at the frontier of LLMs will be especially formative. I am very excited to join the team here and get back to R&D. I remain deeply passionate about education and plan to resume my work on it in time.
85
Shaikh Abdus Samad retweeted
Please pay me 100m to convert papers like openreview.net/pdf?id=3zKtaq… to blogposts! @agarwl_
Our latest post explores on-policy distillation, a training approach that unites the error-correcting relevance of RL with the reward density of SFT. When training it for math reasoning and as an internal chat assistant, we find that on-policy distillation can outperform other approaches for a fraction of the cost.
thinkingmachines.ai/blog/on-…
Kicking off a focused deep dive into LLM inferencing - exploring optimization, quantization, and deployment pipelines.
If you’ve read any great papers/blogs/videos or tried interesting frameworks lately, drop them here 👇
#LLM #AI #ML #DeepLearning #MLOps #Inference #GenAI #AIResearch #AIInfra #ModelServing
2
220
Weekend vibes....
Diving into the Multilingual & Multimodal LLMs chapter, by @Tanmoy_Chak.
Honestly, this book is so underrated - packed with clear explanations and solid insights.
3
217
Why squared error fails for classification and its lessons for ML design
Revisiting my ML notes, I found a key insight: squared error loss from linear regression doesn't work for classification. It creates a non-convex loss function with local minima, trapping gradient descent and preventing optimal solutions.
The solution is logistic loss, which is convex and ensures convergence to a global minimum. My notes detail its derivation, highlighting the mathematical elegance behind our tools.
The broader lesson: every ML, DL, or LLM problem—multi-class classification, ranking, sequence generation, or reinforcement learning—requires a carefully designed loss function. The right loss shapes learning, optimization, and performance.
- Squared error: Linear regression
- Logistic loss: Binary classification
- Cross-entropy: Multi-class problems
- Contrastive loss: Embedding learning
Each domain needs a tailored approach. Success hinges on understanding the mathematics enabling learning, not just choosing a model architecture.
#AI #ML #LLMs #MLSystemDesign
1
3
135
Is your AI image generator producing blurry results? Or are your captioning models calling beautiful photos "just okay"?
The problem might be your training data!
Garbage in = Garbage out.
But when your dataset has millions (or even billions) of images, how do you filter out the bad ones? How do you make sure your model learns from clean, high-quality visuals?
That’s where the LAION Aesthetic Predictor comes in (github.com/LAION-AI/aestheti…). This open-source tool gives each image a score from 1 to 10 based on how visually appealing it is - just like a human might rate it.
It’s super useful if you're:
1) Training text-to-image models
2) Fine-tuning captioning models
3) Curating datasets where looks matter
Have you used aesthetic scoring in your projects? Share your experiences in the comments below!
#AI #MachineLearning #ComputerVision #GenerativeAI #ImageCaptioning
2
78
Shaikh Abdus Samad retweeted
Replying to @aditiitwt
That's quite the tech stack! But real ML engineering is about solving problems, not collecting tools.
This open-source tool gives each image a score from 1 to 10 based on how visually appealing it is, just like a human might rate it.
It’s super useful if you're:
1) Training text-to-image models
2) Fine-tuning captioning models
3) Curating datasets where looks matter
1
58
Have you tried aesthetic scoring in your projects? Share below!
github.com/LAION-AI/aestheti…
50












