Pinned Tweet
An AI agent can be intelligent, but how does it actually interact with the blockchain?
That’s something I find interesting about @meetmotes.
Motes connects each NFT-based agent identity to its own dedicated smart account.
The idea is quite simple:
- The NFT represents the agent’s identity, while the smart account gives it an environment to carry out onchain actions.
- The owner also defines the permissions that govern what the agent can do.
I like how these pieces work together. It connects identity, execution and control instead of treating them as separate problems.
Because building useful AI agents is also about giving them a structured way to act not only making them smarter.
That’s an important part of what Motes is exploring. 🟣
Someone asked a question under my last Motes post that I think is worth discussing:
“Who controls the permissions when the agent starts acting?”
That’s a fair question tbh.
After all, giving an AI agent the ability to interact with onchain applications also raises an important concern: how much freedom should it have?
With @meetmotes, the OWNER defines the agent’s permissions through its smart account, and the account enforces those boundaries.
So the agent can perform actions, but only within the permissions it has been given.
I find this part of Motes particularly interesting.
We’re used to discussing how capable AI agents can become, but control is just as important as capability.
An agent shouldn’t need unlimited authority to be useful.
The owner sets the boundaries. The smart account enforces them. The agent acts within them.
That’s a distinction worth understanding as onchain AI develops. 🟣
Jupiter retweeted
An AI agent can be intelligent, but how does it actually interact with the blockchain?
That’s something I find interesting about @meetmotes.
Motes connects each NFT-based agent identity to its own dedicated smart account.
The idea is quite simple:
- The NFT represents the agent’s identity, while the smart account gives it an environment to carry out onchain actions.
- The owner also defines the permissions that govern what the agent can do.
I like how these pieces work together. It connects identity, execution and control instead of treating them as separate problems.
Because building useful AI agents is also about giving them a structured way to act not only making them smarter.
That’s an important part of what Motes is exploring. 🟣
Someone asked a question under my last Motes post that I think is worth discussing:
“Who controls the permissions when the agent starts acting?”
That’s a fair question tbh.
After all, giving an AI agent the ability to interact with onchain applications also raises an important concern: how much freedom should it have?
With @meetmotes, the OWNER defines the agent’s permissions through its smart account, and the account enforces those boundaries.
So the agent can perform actions, but only within the permissions it has been given.
I find this part of Motes particularly interesting.
We’re used to discussing how capable AI agents can become, but control is just as important as capability.
An agent shouldn’t need unlimited authority to be useful.
The owner sets the boundaries. The smart account enforces them. The agent acts within them.
That’s a distinction worth understanding as onchain AI develops. 🟣
Jupiter retweeted
Someone asked a question under my last Motes post that I think is worth discussing:
“Who controls the permissions when the agent starts acting?”
That’s a fair question tbh.
After all, giving an AI agent the ability to interact with onchain applications also raises an important concern: how much freedom should it have?
With @meetmotes, the OWNER defines the agent’s permissions through its smart account, and the account enforces those boundaries.
So the agent can perform actions, but only within the permissions it has been given.
I find this part of Motes particularly interesting.
We’re used to discussing how capable AI agents can become, but control is just as important as capability.
An agent shouldn’t need unlimited authority to be useful.
The owner sets the boundaries. The smart account enforces them. The agent acts within them.
That’s a distinction worth understanding as onchain AI develops. 🟣
What if an NFT could actually do something beyond sitting in your wallet? That sound cool right?
That’s one of the interesting ideas behind @meetmotes.
Most of us know NFTs as digital collectibles or proof of ownership. Well motes takes that concept in another direction.
Here, an NFT represents an AI agent identity, with its own dedicated smart account.
Think of it this way:
- Your NFT represents the agent.
- The agent has an identity.
- And its smart account gives it an onchain execution environment, with permissions defined by its owner.
What makes this interesting more for me is the connection between digital ownership and the ability to act onchain( just imagine it).
It’s a different way to think about NFT utility, and I think it’s worth paying attention to.
Still early in the Motes journey. More to explore, stay tuned 🟣
@meetmotes
Someone asked a question under my last Motes post that I think is worth discussing:
“Who controls the permissions when the agent starts acting?”
That’s a fair question tbh.
After all, giving an AI agent the ability to interact with onchain applications also raises an important concern: how much freedom should it have?
With @meetmotes, the OWNER defines the agent’s permissions through its smart account, and the account enforces those boundaries.
So the agent can perform actions, but only within the permissions it has been given.
I find this part of Motes particularly interesting.
We’re used to discussing how capable AI agents can become, but control is just as important as capability.
An agent shouldn’t need unlimited authority to be useful.
The owner sets the boundaries. The smart account enforces them. The agent acts within them.
That’s a distinction worth understanding as onchain AI develops. 🟣
What if an NFT could actually do something beyond sitting in your wallet? That sound cool right?
That’s one of the interesting ideas behind @meetmotes.
Most of us know NFTs as digital collectibles or proof of ownership. Well motes takes that concept in another direction.
Here, an NFT represents an AI agent identity, with its own dedicated smart account.
Think of it this way:
- Your NFT represents the agent.
- The agent has an identity.
- And its smart account gives it an onchain execution environment, with permissions defined by its owner.
What makes this interesting more for me is the connection between digital ownership and the ability to act onchain( just imagine it).
It’s a different way to think about NFT utility, and I think it’s worth paying attention to.
Still early in the Motes journey. More to explore, stay tuned 🟣
@meetmotes
Jupiter retweeted
What if an NFT could actually do something beyond sitting in your wallet? That sound cool right?
That’s one of the interesting ideas behind @meetmotes.
Most of us know NFTs as digital collectibles or proof of ownership. Well motes takes that concept in another direction.
Here, an NFT represents an AI agent identity, with its own dedicated smart account.
Think of it this way:
- Your NFT represents the agent.
- The agent has an identity.
- And its smart account gives it an onchain execution environment, with permissions defined by its owner.
What makes this interesting more for me is the connection between digital ownership and the ability to act onchain( just imagine it).
It’s a different way to think about NFT utility, and I think it’s worth paying attention to.
Still early in the Motes journey. More to explore, stay tuned 🟣
@meetmotes
Been looking for something interesting to explore, and @meetmotes just caught my attention.
The Motes Mindshare Campaign is now live on @0xhazels Studio, with 5,000,000 $MOTES allocated to top 500 participants. That’s 0.5% of the total supply.
I’ll be spending the next 60 days getting deeper into the project, understanding what the team is building, exploring its technology and sharing what I learn along the way.
I don’t want this to be another campaign filled with repetitive posts just for leaderboard points.
The goal is to understand Motes properly and bring something valuable to the conversation every day.
Let’s get into it. 🟣
Join the campaign: studio.hazels.io/pulse/motes
@meetmotes
What if an NFT could actually do something beyond sitting in your wallet? That sound cool right?
That’s one of the interesting ideas behind @meetmotes.
Most of us know NFTs as digital collectibles or proof of ownership. Well motes takes that concept in another direction.
Here, an NFT represents an AI agent identity, with its own dedicated smart account.
Think of it this way:
- Your NFT represents the agent.
- The agent has an identity.
- And its smart account gives it an onchain execution environment, with permissions defined by its owner.
What makes this interesting more for me is the connection between digital ownership and the ability to act onchain( just imagine it).
It’s a different way to think about NFT utility, and I think it’s worth paying attention to.
Still early in the Motes journey. More to explore, stay tuned 🟣
@meetmotes
Been looking for something interesting to explore, and @meetmotes just caught my attention.
The Motes Mindshare Campaign is now live on @0xhazels Studio, with 5,000,000 $MOTES allocated to top 500 participants. That’s 0.5% of the total supply.
I’ll be spending the next 60 days getting deeper into the project, understanding what the team is building, exploring its technology and sharing what I learn along the way.
I don’t want this to be another campaign filled with repetitive posts just for leaderboard points.
The goal is to understand Motes properly and bring something valuable to the conversation every day.
Let’s get into it. 🟣
Join the campaign: studio.hazels.io/pulse/motes
@meetmotes
Jupiter retweeted
Been looking for something interesting to explore, and @meetmotes just caught my attention.
The Motes Mindshare Campaign is now live on @0xhazels Studio, with 5,000,000 $MOTES allocated to top 500 participants. That’s 0.5% of the total supply.
I’ll be spending the next 60 days getting deeper into the project, understanding what the team is building, exploring its technology and sharing what I learn along the way.
I don’t want this to be another campaign filled with repetitive posts just for leaderboard points.
The goal is to understand Motes properly and bring something valuable to the conversation every day.
Let’s get into it. 🟣
Join the campaign: studio.hazels.io/pulse/motes
@meetmotes
Been looking for something interesting to explore, and @meetmotes just caught my attention.
The Motes Mindshare Campaign is now live on @0xhazels Studio, with 5,000,000 $MOTES allocated to top 500 participants. That’s 0.5% of the total supply.
I’ll be spending the next 60 days getting deeper into the project, understanding what the team is building, exploring its technology and sharing what I learn along the way.
I don’t want this to be another campaign filled with repetitive posts just for leaderboard points.
The goal is to understand Motes properly and bring something valuable to the conversation every day.
Let’s get into it. 🟣
Join the campaign: studio.hazels.io/pulse/motes
@meetmotes
Jupiter retweeted
Actually this is supposed to be one of the great projects out there from the way billions started
-Great funding
-Hype
-Employed one of the best Community Manager in CT
-Community support
And all fell off due to greediness and poor execution from the team 💔.
Now
-No specific development from the team except botted cs on posts that isn’t relevant to the project it self
-$BILL token down -98%
-The founders closed all comments on their posts
-No hope for token/nfts holders and believers
I will take this because I worked for it , worth over $2k ath now $50💔
The game is gone …
Lol.
This $BILL airdrop is worth ~$2K in May and now around $85, and it could go even lower before the unlock on the 31st.
I secured my sale refund back in June(glad I did), but watching this play out still hurts.
The $BILL narrative and long-term valuation thesis remain strong before TGE but where are they now? . But this is a good reminder that strong fundamentals don't always protect your entry.
Sometimes you can be bullish on the project and still be wrong about the trade.
Actually this is supposed to be one of the great projects out there from the way billions started
-Great funding
-Hype
-Employed one of the best Community Manager in CT
-Community support
And all fell off due to greediness and poor execution from the team 💔.
Now
-No specific development from the team except botted cs on posts that isn’t relevant to the project it self
-$BILL token down -98%
-The founders closed all comments on their posts
-No hope for token/nfts holders and believers
I will take this because I worked for it , worth over $2k ath now $50💔
The game is gone …
Lol.
This $BILL airdrop is worth ~$2K in May and now around $85, and it could go even lower before the unlock on the 31st.
I secured my sale refund back in June(glad I did), but watching this play out still hurts.
The $BILL narrative and long-term valuation thesis remain strong before TGE but where are they now? . But this is a good reminder that strong fundamentals don't always protect your entry.
Sometimes you can be bullish on the project and still be wrong about the trade.
Jupiter retweeted
Lol.
This $BILL airdrop is worth ~$2K in May and now around $85, and it could go even lower before the unlock on the 31st.
I secured my sale refund back in June(glad I did), but watching this play out still hurts.
The $BILL narrative and long-term valuation thesis remain strong before TGE but where are they now? . But this is a good reminder that strong fundamentals don't always protect your entry.
Sometimes you can be bullish on the project and still be wrong about the trade.
Qualified for another 8500 $BILL that is locked till October, lol,
Thanks but no thanks @billions_ntwk
Lol.
This $BILL airdrop is worth ~$2K in May and now around $85, and it could go even lower before the unlock on the 31st.
I secured my sale refund back in June(glad I did), but watching this play out still hurts.
The $BILL narrative and long-term valuation thesis remain strong before TGE but where are they now? . But this is a good reminder that strong fundamentals don't always protect your entry.
Sometimes you can be bullish on the project and still be wrong about the trade.
Qualified for another 8500 $BILL that is locked till October, lol,
Thanks but no thanks @billions_ntwk
Jupiter retweeted
Wait… 10% cashback sounds crazy until you ask one simple question:
10% on how much? 👀
Because with cashback cards, the percentage gets all the attention.
But sometimes, the monthly cap is where the real story is, crypto made easy with @MEXC
Let me break it down. 🧵👇
Wait… 10% cashback sounds crazy until you ask one simple question:
10% on how much? 👀
Because with cashback cards, the percentage gets all the attention.
But sometimes, the monthly cap is where the real story is, crypto made easy with @MEXC
Let me break it down. 🧵👇
If you’re looking at crypto cards, don’t just look at the biggest cashback number.
Look at the rate → monthly cap → eligible spending → tier requirement → payout timing
Want the full breakdown of MEXC Card cashback, tiers, caps & eligibility? 👇
Explore the full details here: mexc.com/learn/article/mexc-…
Replying to @Samson2028 @MEXC
So now I’m curious. 👀
If you were choosing a crypto card, what would you look at first?
-- Cashback rate
-- Monthly cashback cap
-- Spending needed to reach the cap
-- Qualification requirements
Personally, I think you need to look at the whole structure, not just the biggest number on the graphic.
What would you check first??
And that’s the part I find interesting about the MEXC Card.
It isn’t just about seeing a headline like “10% cashback.”
It’s about understanding:
your tier → your rate → your cap → your eligible spending → your actual reward.
That turns a flashy percentage into something you can actually calculate.
MEXC Card
Your Life, Your Card.
Crypto meets everyday life with MEXC
Created in connection with the MEXC Card campaign.











