schettiño retweeted
149,392 $ERG holders.
Let that sink in.
Nearly 150,000 holders for a project sitting at just ~$27M market cap.
I’ve been following Ergo for years, through every high and every low — and numbers like this remind me why I’m still here.
The price is small. The community isn’t
schettiño retweeted
As of block# 1692000, #Ergo block rewards have been reduced to 6 $ERG per block. LFG! @ergo_platform
ergoemissions.degens.world/
schettiño retweeted
Lithos Client v2.0 is released ⛏️
Lots of updates in this version, including #Airdrop tracking. Full version release notes below👇
Be sure to review the updated instructions as there have been some changes to the config
github.com/Lithos-Protocol/L…
Happy Mining! #Ergo #Lithos
schettiño retweeted
The event has started!
clb.mewfinance.com
Please check the deposit addresses in the Medium post below.
Learn how to participate:
medium.com/@manastaking/use-…
schettiño retweeted
Lads, soft launch today. it’s not perfect; it’s honest. every page is for builders first. i put my heart into this—now i need yours: feedback, issues, PRs, ideas. let’s make Ergo easier to build on. ergoblockchain.org $Erg #ERGO
schettiño retweeted
Rosen Bridge is a powerful bridge on Cardano and Ergo that doesn’t get enough love.
$83,249 of value from Cardano to Ergo seamlessly.
It also provides exposure to new assets like rsERG did on Cardano.
I wish their SOL bridge got approved in F14.
schettiño retweeted
Last week, individuals presenting as @HTX_Global representatives told us: pay $30,000 to delay delisting 14 days, or $100,000 to halt it. This was described as a “marketing fee.” We call it #HTXtortion.
Even our initial back-channel outreach relayed back with: “it doesn’t have to be a trading competition, it can just be a payment to avoid delisting.”
If projects keep complying, crypto becomes the casino these exchanges are steering it into. Projects, not shady gatekeepers, should be driving the future of this industry.
Flip the script. Publish the receipts. Hold exchanges accountable. We’ve started here: github.com/sigmanauts/accoun…
schettiño retweeted
Update: @HTX_Jasper left our telegram chat rather than engage in discussions. Mostly because he knew he had just lied publicly about @HTX_Global’s delisting “due diligence”
Good to find out you are the head of listing. The exact same that happened to Ergo happened to $VEMP. You took $500,000 from us in listing fees, not once did you even give us any ST warning, and on top, we were halfway through discussing our token migration with your team.
schettiño retweeted
Good to find out you are the head of listing. The exact same that happened to Ergo happened to $VEMP. You took $500,000 from us in listing fees, not once did you even give us any ST warning, and on top, we were halfway through discussing our token migration with your team.
schettiño retweeted
We received one notification on 07/08 prior to the delisting on 09/09. Our requests for clarification on the specific metrics required to avoid delisting went unanswered. These metrics were also not specified in our signed contract
Given the significant cost of integration, the lack of collaborative support was surprising and hindered our ability to build sustainable volume and ensure a successful listing. Our project met all key market metrics such as depth and spread. Setting minimum volume requirements (during the tail end of a bear!) and offering low-fee accounts encourages wash trading, which benefits neither party in the long run. Learned nothing?
thedefiant.io/news/regulatio…
The sequence of events suggests that if we had simply generated volume ourselves, we would not have been delisted. Does that truly align with the criteria of a 'well-run project'?"
schettiño retweeted
If the head of listings spews such falsehoods, one can't imagine what the rest of their company is like...wait, I think we can...
"If it's a well-run project, why should we delist it?"...I have 100k reasons why you did, boss...
schettiño retweeted
Head of listings at @HTX_Global offering to make it all go away with a 100k "marketing fee". This is just the tail of that chat, more to come, boss...
It is with deep concern that we share the following news: Ergo is being delisted from @HTX_Global.
Our signed listing agreement contained no volume requirements. Despite this, we were later placed on an ST list without clear or timely notification of any new rules. Once we were FINALLY aware of our delisting (a month after we were supposed to receive the ST notice but hadn't), we pivoted and met liquidity requirements. By then were told by the person assigned to us that they were “not a decision maker” and delisting would proceed. There was no ability to escalate, ever.
After a very difficult behind the scenes process, we were connected with the head of listings themselves and were offered a 100k "marketing" package to cancel the delisting process. We have receipts of this conversation.
To us, this raises serious questions about whether projects are being asked to make undisclosed payments to avoid delisting and meet random requirements. If true, this practice would place projects in an impossible position and make maintaining a listing at a HTX a difficult feat for any non VC project.
How many other projects have quietly paid so called additional ‘marketing fees’ to remain listed? How does a global company operate in such a manner that doesn't communicate properly and retain no principled approach to requirements and or working with projects who have spent $$$,$$$ to join their platform.
Transparency matters. Communities deserve answers.
Please remove your ERG from this exchange before the deadline (htx.com/support/650122665931…)
schettiño retweeted
We badly need more liquidity on DEXes. I know all too well how CEXs treat smaller crypto projects and the tactics they use. Only decentralization can truly solve this problem.
Ergo is a spiritual successor to Bitcoin and deserves so much more love and respect than it gets. From the Cardano side, it would be good to see Ergo launch as a partnerchain and embrace a more scoped ecosystem. It's hard for us to help out much as a separate layer 1.
It is with deep concern that we share the following news: Ergo is being delisted from @HTX_Global.
Our signed listing agreement contained no volume requirements. Despite this, we were later placed on an ST list without clear or timely notification of any new rules. Once we were FINALLY aware of our delisting (a month after we were supposed to receive the ST notice but hadn't), we pivoted and met liquidity requirements. By then were told by the person assigned to us that they were “not a decision maker” and delisting would proceed. There was no ability to escalate, ever.
After a very difficult behind the scenes process, we were connected with the head of listings themselves and were offered a 100k "marketing" package to cancel the delisting process. We have receipts of this conversation.
To us, this raises serious questions about whether projects are being asked to make undisclosed payments to avoid delisting and meet random requirements. If true, this practice would place projects in an impossible position and make maintaining a listing at a HTX a difficult feat for any non VC project.
How many other projects have quietly paid so called additional ‘marketing fees’ to remain listed? How does a global company operate in such a manner that doesn't communicate properly and retain no principled approach to requirements and or working with projects who have spent $$$,$$$ to join their platform.
Transparency matters. Communities deserve answers.
Please remove your ERG from this exchange before the deadline (htx.com/support/650122665931…)
schettiño retweeted
JUST IN: @ergo_platform has gone public with the news that @HTX_Global will de-list $ERGO off their exchange.
Ergo Platform has alleged the signed listed agreement contained no volume or liquidity requirements, yet this de-listing was processed without proper notice unless they paid a staggering $100,000 "marketing fee."
The Firo Organization (@firoorg) corroborated these allegations and cited concerns with HTX's de-listing process, stating they were "delisted citing volume and liquidity when they far exceeded the requirements stated in the delist notice."
Firo also stated they were "aware of other projects being offered similar 'marketing' packages to stay listed to remove the ST tag which is not inline with the messaging of the delist notice either."
The Ergo community is suggested to remove their $ERGO from HTX or risk losing these assets entirely.
It is with deep concern that we share the following news: Ergo is being delisted from @HTX_Global.
Our signed listing agreement contained no volume requirements. Despite this, we were later placed on an ST list without clear or timely notification of any new rules. Once we were FINALLY aware of our delisting (a month after we were supposed to receive the ST notice but hadn't), we pivoted and met liquidity requirements. By then were told by the person assigned to us that they were “not a decision maker” and delisting would proceed. There was no ability to escalate, ever.
After a very difficult behind the scenes process, we were connected with the head of listings themselves and were offered a 100k "marketing" package to cancel the delisting process. We have receipts of this conversation.
To us, this raises serious questions about whether projects are being asked to make undisclosed payments to avoid delisting and meet random requirements. If true, this practice would place projects in an impossible position and make maintaining a listing at a HTX a difficult feat for any non VC project.
How many other projects have quietly paid so called additional ‘marketing fees’ to remain listed? How does a global company operate in such a manner that doesn't communicate properly and retain no principled approach to requirements and or working with projects who have spent $$$,$$$ to join their platform.
Transparency matters. Communities deserve answers.
Please remove your ERG from this exchange before the deadline (htx.com/support/650122665931…)