@Section_230

Section 230 isn't perfect but it remains the best approach that we've seen for dealing with a very messy internet in which there are no good solutions.

 United States
botsentinel.com/profile/1323339234078531584
Joined November 2020
  • Tweets27.8K
  • Following24
  • Followers1.6K
Check out the absolutely stunning amount of astroturfing being done by Jason Fyk's "Social Media Freedom Foundation". These always ramp up when he loses in court. Guess what happened on the 12th? @mmasnick @ericgoldman xitter.cf/search?q=(%22Section%2… @elonMusk @support @x @MichaelEhline

("Section 230" AND "501c3") - Search / X

The latest posts on ("Section 230" AND "501c3"). Read what people are saying and join the conversation.

x.com
3
1
4
1,648
Trump didn't watch the TPUSA Halftime show. He watched Bad Bunny.
3
1
5
242
themirror.com/news/us-news/t…

Footage shows Trump's Super Bowl party had Bad Bunny on screen, not Kid Rock

Donald Trump and his Mar-a-Lago Super Bowl party guests were dubbed a 'bunch of hypocrites' as footage showed Bad Bunny's halftime performance playing rather than TPUSA's alternative Kid Rock show

themirror.com
1
75
Could you explain why you believe your First Amendment right to Freedom of Religion and Freedom of Expression without Government Interference, should override anyone else's First Amendment right to not Associate with you and your Speech on their private property?
Kurt Ploeger@kurtes25Jan 24
Replying to @True_Zenith @Lormif1 @ThinkingSapien @TheGreatestOfEE @JoeShmo08508044 @Section_230
Section 230 was/is about the GOVERNMENT taking away your right to free speech. How can you have so much trouble understanding such a simple concept?
1
1
3
212
Firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or justice.gov/d9/pages/attachm…
1
3
7
133
(2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.”
2
7
105
Facebook Publishes a social media platform. Twitter Publishes a micro-blogging platform. YouTube Publishes a video hosting platform. 4chan Publishes a imageboard platform. The term 'Platform' has no legal definition or significance. What point were you trying to make?
Thulean Uruk-hai@SciFiPhreak30 Nov 2025
Replying to @DavidStonesFan @IronWolf1970 @elonmusk
No, either you are a bot with a bad algorithm or a human who needs to learn to read. Your quote repeats exactly what my point was - that Elon needs to decide if X is to be a platform or a publisher. If the former then he cannot restrict speech merely because he doesn't like it.
2
2
10
409
Laura Loomer’s lawsuit lifeless... letting lawful limits of liability linger. thehill.com/regulation/court…

Supreme Court declines to revive Laura Loomer RICO suit against Meta, Twitter

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to revive right-wing activist Laura Loomer’s racketeering lawsuit against Meta and Twitter, now known as X, alleging they conspired to suppress conservative pol…

thehill.com
4
121
The myth of “government censorship” on social media is everywhere... but what’s really behind it? A recent Tech Dirt podcast with @mmasnick and @noupside (author, Invisible Rulers) dives deep into how this narrative took hold. techdirt.com/2025/09/30/tech…
2
1
159
more replies
Meanwhile, committees subpoena tech companies and researchers based on misleading data (“22 million censored tweets!”). Reality check: Stanford flagged ~2,700 tweets for review—not at government direction and most were ignored by platforms anyway.
2
81
60% were ignored. That leaves about 1100 that were removed. Not "22 million".
65
That means speaking up, even if some minds never change
2
1
1
64
But numbers get twisted into headline fodder.
54
Load more