How dumb do you have to be to be an Al Sayed Supporter
On one hand: Sending $3 Billion to Israel increases prices at home
On the other: Lets spends $100's Billion overseas to my pet causes is awesome
Secular Conservative retweeted
96% of Jews in Poland were murdered by the Nazis. That is genocide.
3% of Gaza’s population, mostly male combatants, died in the war they started. That is not genocide.
Secular Conservative retweeted
I used to think blaming Israel for absolutely everything was a Middle Eastern tradition. Too hot? Israel. Too cold? Israel. Bad weather? Definitely Mossad. But apparently, the West has adopted the tradition too! Win an election? Blame Israel. Lose an election? Blame Israel. Bad day? Israel. Good day? Suspiciously Israel. Burnt your toast? Netanyahu probably personally approved it.
And the funniest part? In Israel, some Israelis blame Israel for everything going wrong in the West and the Middle East too!
At this point, if aliens invade Earth, someone will demand an investigation into their links with Mossad.( BTW, some YouTubers believe that has already happened and that Zionists were behind it too).
Israel might be the only country in history blamed for both causing the problem and failing to prevent it.
Secular Conservative retweeted
Now that US aid to Israel has been terminated, I better see you idiots posting all day, every day, how terrible it is you can't afford twinkies because Jordan is still receiving $1.65 billion a year from America.
Secular Conservative retweeted
All my replies today:
“I didn’t sit out the election because I was brainwashed by podcasters! I sat out the election because Netanyahu secretly runs America and the Epstein class blackmailed Trump into fighting endless wars for Israel!”
lol
Secular Conservative retweeted
Letting Vance slam the brakes on Iran looks dumber and dumber.
It's a misconception America "hates war".
We don't hate war; we hate a quagmire. The Iraq invasion was popular. The occupation was a disaster.
Acting against Iran didn't cost you—negotiating with them did.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Secular Conservative retweeted
We do not defend Israel on a whim, but because today it is the bulwark of our values in the world against those who want to destroy us.
LONG LIVE FREEDOM, DAMN IT...!!!
Secular Conservative retweeted
Rich boomer libs: We won and are taking back America.
America's enemies:
Imagine being so Anti-Israel in politics and not understanding how much China, Russia,Iran, Qatar play in politics
Secular Conservative retweeted
No one's talking about this rort.
$325 million in Multiculturalism grants last year.
5,400% increase in just a few years.
94% to Labor seats.
$45 million to Tony Burke's seat.
No accountability.
Thanks @nthaverbrook for the edit.
Secular Conservative retweeted
.@AbdulElSayed says it’s ok for MEN to be in girl’s locker rooms.
Why?
“Well because they are going to find out about it on the internet anyway”
Completely unacceptable.























