To all the people saying Flo Balogun should sit for the “integrity of the game”.
Perhaps Belgium should let Senegal play in its place for the integrity of the game.
Belgium doesn’t even deserve to be here and their waffles are overrated.
Presenting…the Golden Age Warriors!!
"[LeBron James] wants to play with Steph Curry. ... Steph and LeBron is magic. Steph and LeBron moves the needle."
@KendrickPerkins LOVES the idea of the two All-Stars teaming up in the Bay 👏
Seize 🍌 retweeted
No dead NFT project at this point should be charging anyone willing to takeover the project.
Them taking it over is a BAIL OUT. You don’t get paid to get bailed out.
You’re all entitled to your own opinions, but there’s not an aesthically better looking mutant in the collection…there just isn’t.
As someone who’s always liked you & always been frustrated with OpenSea’s poor decision making; & notably, didn’t participate in this wave stuff, here’s my completely objective opinion.
Wanting to do the right thing & being willing to do the right thing, are 2 different things.
alright, let's address a few items that keep popping up on the timeline.
every single dollar that opensea received in platform fees over the last 5 months was used for one of two purposes:
1. to purchase prizes which were distributed via treasure chests
2. to offer optional refunds via our claim site
imagine all of the platform fees in a single account. we spent some of the funds on prizes. and then had to figure out the right way to distribute what was remaining across hundreds of thousands of wallets.
on the refund page we shared a ledger of:
1. how much each user spent on platform fees (i.e. how much they contributed to the "account" above)
2. what we paid for each prize they'd already received in their treasure chests
if there was a gap, that became the optional refund amount. which we determined was the fairest way to redistribute 100% of the remaining funds.
let's talk for a second about those two numbers above.
when calculating how much each user spent on fees, we did it based on the USD value of those fees at the time of transaction. so for example, if you paid 0.01 ETH of platform fees on Nov 1st, we took the USD value of ETH that day, which was $3,800, and attributed $38 vs. the value of that same ETH today at $21. this was opensea essentially going back in time and irrefutably doing right by users.
when showing the ledger of prizes, many are incorrectly viewing this as "what they're worth" compared to how much opensea "paid" out of our fees account for those prizes. i get it guys, not every NFT is worth today what it was when you received it. and i know sometimes you had to pay royalties to sell them. but the reason we shared this information was to help you understand how we calculated the refund amounts and redistributed the remaining fees from the account. this was very simply, transparency.
to those who didn't have a refund to claim, it meant that you were one of the lucky ones. the amount opensea paid for the prizes you received was more than you had actually spent in platform fees. so you got to essentially trade for free for 5 months and still keep the Treasures you earned. the fact i see people complaining about this particular outcome is puzzling to say the least.
on the point of not providing more details on TGE - that's essentially why the refunds are being offered. the Foundation will share more when they're ready. but you should not expect more information in the immediate term.
opensea was not required to provide these refunds. we did so because we thought it was the right thing to do. if you're truly upset about the way they were calculated, or frustrated that more information on TGE isn't being offered right now, in my opinion, you should personally consider taking the refund.
i for one am extremely excited about what we're creating and our future. opensea is building incredible things that will change the way the world interacts onchain. and we're not going anywhere.
Your users made decisions based on your commitments & lost, different than speculating on markets. If $SEA launched as planned & failed, their loss is on them. Since it didn’t launch, their loss is on you.
OS posturing that they’re doing right by them, but it’s a half measure.
Turn replies on, coward.
What an epic night. I’m truly grateful for the Pokémon community, Ken Goldin, and my team for making last night a historic moment for the hobby.
To address concerns regarding the ownership history of the card, now for the facts:
I had originally offered to sell up to 51% of the Illustrator on Liquid Marketplace but ultimately only 5.4% of the card was sold for about $270k in the Summer of 2022 to fractional owners associated with LM.
In May 2024, I bought the card back for the same price it was sold for per the terms of LM and made funds available for users to withdraw. I was told that those funds were available to be withdrawn for approximately a year after being deposited in LM users’ accounts, and many of the fractional owners did indeed withdraw those funds during that time.
For reasons outside of my control, the LM site then went offline. When I learned users could no longer withdraw their funds on LM’s site, I personally paid to get the site back up. Users are now able to withdraw their funds (and they have been) at liquidmarketplace.io. They were also notified via e-mail
Congrats to the buyer for an iconic purchase the entire world will remember. Although bittersweet, I was proud to be a steward of the greatest collectible in the world for the last 5 years
May the next Pokémon journey be as delightful as the last…
This take 👇🏽
To be honest NFTs were never meant to be quick flips, they were meant to represent ownership and community.
Everyone treated them like lottery tickets
Bought at the top, sold at the bottom but never stuck around for what was being built
The market didn't fail you, you failed the market
Now you're bitter calling the entire space a scam when really you just had zero patience and made emotional decisions.
….and what happens to all assets left on the platform?
< 1 month is incredibly short, most won’t see this, nor the email
Sincerely hope this is in good faith, as there’s material financial incentive for the company to set a tight deadline to withdraw to keep what’s not theirs
Today, we are announcing that the Nifty Gateway platform will be closing on February 23, 2026. Starting today, Nifty Gateway is in withdrawal-only mode.
Nifty Gateway was launched in 2020 with the vision of revolutionizing digital art. Since launching, Nifty supported dozens of innovative drops and brought new creative experiences to life. We are incredibly proud of the work the Nifty team has pioneered and grateful to Nifty Gateway’s customers and artists for joining us on this journey.
Customers with a current balance of USD or ETH, or who hold an NFT, will be notified by email with instructions for moving their assets off of the Nifty platform. Please reach out to [email protected] with any questions.
Is it any wonder at all that they are selling to speculators with no actual interest in the product?
Or maybe they just don’t care, whatever drives short-term fee generation.
I think people are underestimating the IRL clubhouse massively, but I get it.
For many here, a physical location in Miami sounds cool, but realistically they’ll benefit from it once a year, if even - but they’re missing the “but”.
It’ll also draw a younger, more counter-culture, crowd that traditional “stuffy” country clubs that will appeal to young people with disposable income & a desire to connect with people.











