sem (@SemtecksRS) header
sem (@SemtecksRS) profile picture

42

Joined June 2020
Photo by sem (@SemtecksRS)Photo by sem (@SemtecksRS)Photo by sem (@SemtecksRS)Photo by sem (@SemtecksRS)Photo by sem (@SemtecksRS)Photo by sem (@SemtecksRS)Photo by sem (@SemtecksRS)Photo by sem (@SemtecksRS)Photo by sem (@SemtecksRS)Photo by sem (@SemtecksRS)
1 Defence, No bank, Infernal cape. It's done.
16
16
3
276
Im predicting venator bow meta this league
2
206
Maybe follow me on bluesky so I can leave this app
185
The one place you can't bring escape crystal lol..
12
1
31
12,418
cg on the hc
3
17
1,137
Fuck
McbrideI has died! Rank 1,622 Overall with 227,380,113 XP -- Rank 3 Spindel - 2,725 KC Rank 11 Artio - 1,603 KC Rank 18 The Corrupted Gauntlet - 1,052 KC --
1
1
390
Thank you to everyone watching the new video. There’s a lot of progress left to catch up to present day and I’m working on editing the next one. Should definitely take me less than a year!!
1
187
Long overdue progress video #5 for the Pure UIM is out!
1
2
543
Long overdue progress video #5 for the Pure UIM is out!
1
1
8
840
Oh fuck nightmare changes might make me unburn
2
2
297
Oh wow you hired a law firm that specializes in “mitigating risks” related to harassment allegations, and they said you’re actually all good! And then end it with a threat of legal action against the individual.
There were a series of accusations about our company last August from a former employee. Immediately following these accusations, LMG hired Roper Greyell - a large Vancouver-based law firm specializing in labor and employment law, to conduct a third-party investigation. Their website describes them as “one of the largest employment and labour law firms in Western Canada.” They work with both private and public sector employers. To ensure a fair investigation, LMG did not comment or publicly release any data and asked our team members to do the same. Now that the investigation is complete, we’re able to provide a summary of the findings. The investigation found that: - Claims of bullying and harassment were not substantiated. - Allegations that sexual harassment were ignored or not addressed were false. - Any concerns that were raised were investigated. Furthermore, from reviewing our history, the investigator is confident that if any other concerns had been raised, we would have investigated them. - There was no evidence of “abuse of power” or retaliation. The individual involved may not have agreed with our decisions or performance feedback, but our actions were for legitimate work-related purposes, and our business reasons were valid. - Allegations of process errors and miscommunication while onboarding this individual were partially substantiated, but the investigator found ample documentary evidence of LMG working to rectify the errors and the individual being treated generously and respectfully. When they had questions, they were responded to and addressed. In summary, as confirmed by the investigation, the allegations made against the team were largely unfounded, misleading, and unfair. With all of that said, in the spirit of ongoing improvement, the investigator shared their general recommendation that fast-growing workplaces should invest in continuing professional development. The investigator encouraged us to provide further training to our team about how to raise concerns to reinforce our existing workplace policies. Prior to receiving this report, LMG solicited anonymous feedback from the team in an effort to ensure there was no unreported bullying and harassment and hosted a training session which reiterated our workplace policies and reinforced our reporting structure. LMG will continue to assess ongoing continuing education for our team. At this time, we feel our case for a defamation suit would be very strong; however, our deepest wish is to simply put all of this behind us. We hope that will be the case, given the investigator’s clear findings that the allegations made online were misrepresentations of what actually occurred. We will continue to assess if there is persistent reputational damage or further defamation. This doesn’t mean our company is perfect and our journey is over. We are continuously learning and trying to do better. Thank you all for being part of our community.
8
737
Wah wah did you guys know? The real victims of patriarchy aren’t all the women with practical experiences leading them to feel unsafe around men, its actually this nice guy and his precious feelings.
What an absolute hit to the mental health when a bunch of random internet women consider me a larger threat than a literal 600 pound apex predator
4
638
Using the argument of “this isn’t what the game is supposed to be” when talking about dupe protection is dumb. This game is nothing like it used to be. You play this game completely differently to the way you did years ago, articulate your concerns better.
2
250
Instead of dupe protection, id like a system of just softening the curve on drop rarity. Similar to skilling pet drops post-200m, make it more likely to get things after going over its droprate.
1
1
274
After 11k shamans on my main and later 34k on my uim, I have become a bit of an rng hater im afraid. More grinds that are relatively consistent would be favorable to me.
Honestly, thinking about it more, I think a straight drop rate increase on the DWH is the wrong move, or at least, a boring one. The issue with very rare drops is not the average length of the grind but the massive possible variance in the grind length. 1/5
5
454
Hearing a landlord dislike this is actually exactly the endorsement im looking for.
As a landlord, this is a terrible take - should be basing it off of market rent / cost to up keep the property.
5
491
K but if noname did all this yall are eating it up
I'm struggling to find someone I hate more and have never met. This is coming from someone who chilled with shamans in Peru. teapaw.org/WomenBeingAwful/status…
335