Public picks, graded against the closing line. No paid grades.
San Francisco
Joined April 2026
- Tweets188
- Following210
- Followers82
- Likes482
Pinned Tweet
Don’t take our word for it. Check the Receipts.
Respect to @EVergreenBets for putting its independently graded SharpPulse Record directly on its paywall.
Public picks. Independent CLV grading. A Record anyone can inspect.
This is what transparency should look like.
Check the record before you buy.
Don’t believe our +EV picks are profitable long term? Don't take our word for it.
Our record is now independently tracked by @SharpPulseHQ and displayed right on our paywall.
We're confident enough in our picks to let anyone judge the results 🌲
Win-loss records lie. The closing line doesn’t.
Starting today: the SharpPulse Prediction Log.
#1: @MoneylineMafia_
37–23, +23.5% ROI. Looks elite.
But only 10% of his picks beat the close.
CLV says regression is coming. We’ll revisit at 160 graded picks, right or wrong.
At what point can we tell the difference between luck and skill in sports betting?
@MoneylineMafia_ has an interesting public Record.
37–23 across 60 settled picks.
+23.5% standardized ROI.
But only 10% of his 61 CLV-graded picks beat the closing line.
Avg CLV: −3.26%.
The results say one thing. The closing market says another.
How much evidence do we need before calling it skill?
At what point can we tell the difference between luck and skill in sports betting?
@MoneylineMafia_ has an interesting public Record.
37–23 across 60 settled picks.
+23.5% standardized ROI.
But only 10% of his 61 CLV-graded picks beat the closing line.
Avg CLV: −3.26%.
The results say one thing. The closing market says another.
How much evidence do we need before calling it skill?
90 days in and already building something special. Appreciate you guys having us along for the ride 🤝🌲
90 days since EVergreen launched! 🌲
Our partners have been huge for our growth the past 3 months…
Thus our new Partners page is LIVE!
@OddsLinkAPI @BetOpenly @SharpPulseHQ @GoBetSmart @the_bankrollu @ProphetX
Want to partner? 📩 [email protected]
evergreenbets.app/partners
Would you rather find your own edge or tail someone else's? 👀
We've been looking through publicly posted NFL picks from cappers and betting products.
Two accounts worth recognizing:
@SC_FFB 20 NFL slips, averaging +7.4% Closing EV.
@BetThisGuy 43 NFL slips, averaging +3.2% Closing EV.
Different approaches. Both showing positive closing-price performance in the picks we've graded.
Before you tail a pick, check who's giving it to you.
SharpPulse now separates Cappers, Betting Products, and EV Bettors into three public leaderboards.
See their graded picks, closing line performance, and independent Records.
The winning screenshots are easy to find. The full record should be too.
It's NFL Sunday. Thousands of people are about to tail picks from someone they know nothing about.
They've seen the winning slips. The lock of the day. The VIP screenshots.
But have they seen the losses?
The original odds? The closing line? The actual record?
That's why we built SharpPulse.
We audit publicly posted picks and turn them into independent, verifiable Records.
Who audits the auditor?
SharpPulse grades businesses that have spent years building their reputations.
We establish the rules for which picks qualify, how closing prices are selected, and how every grade is calculated. That's a responsibility we take seriously.
Our methodology is public. Our corrections are public. Every graded pick is inspectable. Our work should stand up to the same scrutiny we apply to everyone else.
The SharpPulse Closing Standard, grading methodology, and correction history are public.
See exactly how we evaluate the records we publish.
Methodology: sharppulse.app/methodology
Corrections: sharppulse.app/corrections
SWEEP 004🧾
A new name at #1 on SharpPulse.
BetThisGuy
Independent results. Every pick inspectable.
The deeper breakdown:
NBA: +3.9% Avg CLV across 51 picks.
36/51 beat the close.
NFL receptions: +4.3% across 32 picks.
24/32 beat the close.
94 graded picks later, @BetThisGuy is still holding +3.61% Avg CLV.
The full @SC_FFB Record is public.
107 graded picks. Trends, estimated P&L, and every Receipt available to inspect.
Check the record before you buy.
sharppulse.app/c/SC_FFB
Where SC_FFB stood out:
NFL: +7.4% Avg CLV across 20 picks.
17/20 beat the close.
NFL receptions: 10/10 beat the close.
And the trend is climbing. His cumulative Avg CLV went from negative territory to +1.40% across 107 graded picks.
Everyone claims to have an edge.
We're building the place to check.
1,438 public picks graded.
21 Records ranked.
No paid grades. No disappearing losses.
Check the record before you buy.
SWEEP 002 🧾
Another +EV betting product. One independent standard.
119 public picks graded.
+3.59% average CLV.
69% beat the close.
A+.
But what was that edge actually worth?
We ran the numbers. 👇
The product is @EVergreenBets.
Evergreen was the first to put its independent SharpPulse Record directly in front of customers.
Now our founding Research Partner.
The badge updates live. The research is public. The grading stays independent.
Check the record before you buy.
sharppulse.app/c/EVergreenBe…
Behind the grade:
718 public posts collected.
563 observations reviewed.
451 excluded with documented reasons.
Then we modeled $100 per graded pick.
$11,900 in hypothetical stakes.
+$428 in estimated closing market value.
Not actual winnings. Measured edge, translated into dollars.
Most losing bettors don’t have a picking problem. They have a price problem.
Two bettors took OKC. Both won.
Same $100 risk. $23 less profit.
Before your next bet, take 30 seconds to compare the exact same line across sportsbooks.
Same pick. Better price. That's line shopping.
The result: 207 public picks graded.
+3.19% Avg CLV.
+3.16% Median CLV.
74% beat close.
A+ grade.
EVStrike ranks #1 among Products on SharpPulse.
Every graded pick has a Receipt. Exclusions and corrections are public.
Every sports betting tool claims an edge.
Today, we look at the math.
Sweep #001: @ev_strike
1,751 timeline posts read.
