IT geek, massive Star Trek fan and concerned citizen! Herr Klaus and his acolytes can do one...

San Francisco Fleet Yards (UK)
Joined October 2020
Must watch video!
45
323
64
521
84,959
We were so right to vote out.
Most Western democracies have been hacked. Not with code. With institutional architecture. Let me show you how it works, using the most advanced example: the European Union. First, how it works. Once every five years, you vote for a European Parliament that cannot even initiate legislation. The body that proposes laws is the Commission: 27 commissioners nobody elected, appointed after backroom bargaining between heads of state. Bills are then negotiated between the Commission, Parliament and Council in "trilogues", closed-door meetings where the real decisions get made. A law that will apply to 450 million people goes through corridors that 99.9% of them will never see. Now look at who's in those corridors. Brussels has become the lobbying capital of the world: nearly 18,000 organizations on the transparency register, tens of thousands of lobbyists, more than 50 for every single MEP. And that's just the declared part. Add the revolving door: a former MEP only has to wait six months before becoming a lobbyist to the EU himself. The real problem is distance. A national MP who votes for a law that ruins the farmers in his district runs into them at the market on Saturday. In Brussels, the decision-maker never meets the people who live with his decisions. But he meets lobbyists every day: at lunch, at cocktails, at conferences. So the system doesn't optimize for the wellbeing of the people. It optimizes for the interests of whoever is in the room. You don't even need corruption for that, incentives are enough. Although sometimes, as Qatargate showed, there's corruption too. The result: the system has a structural incentive to accept things the people would never vote for. Take Mercosur. Twenty-five years of negotiations. France votes against it in the Council in January 2026 and gets outvoted. To keep national parliaments from blocking it, the Commission splits the deal into two texts, including a trade agreement that only needs a vote in Brussels. The European Parliament itself writes, in black and white, that this split circumvents the right of national parliaments, and refers the deal to the EU Court of Justice. The Commission's response: it has been applying the agreement provisionally since May 1, 2026, without waiting for the Court's opinion. Farmers were protesting outside Parliament. They lost anyway. And remember the one time the people were actually asked about Europe directly: in 2005, France and the Netherlands rejected the European Constitution. The text came back two years later as the Lisbon Treaty, ratified by parliaments. No more referendums. But the worst of it is immigration. In 2015, relocation quotas were imposed by qualified majority on countries that had voted against them. Since June 12, 2026, the Pact on Migration and Asylum applies across the entire Union, with its "mandatory solidarity" mechanism: you take people in, or you pay. Not a single European people has ever been consulted directly on this, even though it's the issue that is transforming our societies most profoundly. And this is where we have to talk about the most sophisticated piece of the machine: George Soros. Soros understood before anyone else that you don't need to win elections if you shape the ecosystem around the people who make decisions. His network, the Open Society Foundations, describes itself as the largest private funder of advocacy groups in the world. In Brussels, it runs its own lobbying arm aimed at EU institutions, the Open Society European Policy Institute. Here's what we know from internal documents leaked in 2016: a document titled "Reliable allies in the European Parliament" listed more than 200 MEPs. Strategy papers described building "inside-track groups" to caucus "internal allies" who could advance their goals in their daily work. Training sessions were organized for MEPs on how to counter so-called populist parties. The mechanism is brutally elegant. Think tanks produce the "expertise". NGOs produce the "demand from civil society". Legal NGOs litigate in the courts. Funded media outlets produce the narrative. The Brussels decision-maker, cut off from the population, hears the same message from every direction and ends up believing that this is what people want. And the craziest part: the institutions fund the loop themselves. Between 2021 and 2023, the EU paid around €7.4 billion to NGOs, and the European Court of Auditors found the use of that money insufficiently transparent. It even came out that the Commission had funded NGOs to lobby MEPs in favor of its own Green Deal legislation. The institution pays "civil society" to ask it to do what it already wanted to do. All of this is legal. That's exactly what makes it a hack and not a crime. The system works exactly as designed, except nobody designed it for the people anymore. The patch is simple to state and hard to impose: bring decisions back closer to the people who bear them, hold referendums on issues that change a civilization, create a mandatory register for every influence actor, NGOs included, with their funding sources, and shut the revolving door. Until that happens, European democracy will remain what it has become: a user interface sitting on top of a system that runs for someone else.
4
16
371
The idea that vaccines are safe was unfalsifiable. It was a faith based policy. Nothing to do with science.
Look at this. The date is a typo. By January 15, 2021, injury reports were so beyond the worst-case scenario that the contractor could not keep up. NO ONE SAID ANYTHING! We have all the names of people who knew! This is from a data dump from @ICANdecide s3.documentcloud.org/documen…
5
27
1
96
2,265
True Climate Believers detest this chart. It is like Kryptonite to them Their whole case rests on the idea that if the climate changes, Mother Nature and humanity take no notice and just stubbornly carry on as before. Until some unidentified climate catastrophe kills them off. But the chart shows that we ADAPT. We get ever better at handling bad weather/climate change. And so it is LESS of a threat to us as time goes by. True Believers look upon this as 'cheating'. By lessening the impact we somehow avoid the 'problem' they are so obsessed with. Which is exactly right. We avoid it. Good for us! PS True believers also have doubts about penicillin and seat belts. On exactly the same spurious grounds. 'Cheating'.
I am really really struggling to find actual evidence of the 'climate harms' that the cultists claim to see all around them. For example, 'climate deaths' are waaaay down compared with 100 years ago. Very roughly you have a 1 in 400,000 chance of dying 'from climate' in any year. There is just about 1 climate death in every 3,000 deaths overall. 2,999 die of something else This number does not float my boat very much at all! You?
7
59
2
136
1,674
DJSharpieD retweeted
So here we have this former Russian ambassador explaining how the Donbass war began. There was a coup d’état in Kyiv in 2014, financed by the US. The new installed regime banned the Russian language, and the population of Crimea voted in a referendum for their independence against the ban on their native language. Kyiv then intervened militarily in Donbass in 2014, which triggered the war. The Minsk agreements then followed. Russia finally intervened in 2022 because there was no other solution to protect its compatriots in Donbass, who had been attacked for 8 years.
228
2,263
144
4,413
61,148
We don’t need free movement, we don’t need immigration, we don’t need endless third world migrants. We need to get healthy British men and women currently claiming benefits back into work. Millions of them. It is that simple.
536
2,526
51
21,676
183,636
DJSharpieD retweeted
What stage of democracy is this? "The majority of Italian society is against military aid to Ukraine. But we must not listen to society if it is wrong." -- Italian Minister of Defense.
333
1,508
126
6,260
94,449
DJSharpieD retweeted
Net zero added £140.3bn to Britain's electricity bills in 2002–24: £2,286 for the average household. Modelled, in 2024 prices. Nobody official counts it. Parliament should require a yearly statement, with data anyone can check. richardlyon.substack.com/p/n…
5
14
3
26
1,604
We are paying far too much for electricity because wind & solar have to be subsidised & backed up with imported electricity & gas.
Net zero added £140.3bn to Britain's electricity bills in 2002–24: £2,286 for the average household. Modelled, in 2024 prices. Nobody official counts it. Parliament should require a yearly statement, with data anyone can check. richardlyon.substack.com/p/n…
1
15
1
40
777
I confirm the 2023 peace-treaty plan that was leaked to the FT. What the draft envisaged: - Russia withdraws its troops from most of the four oblasts it had just declared “annexed.” - The new line of demarcation runs roughly along the line as of February 24, 2022: Crimea and the part of Donbas that Russia controlled before the full-scale invasion. - Ukraine recognizes Russian control over Crimea. - Ukraine grants Russia an unobstructed land corridor to Crimea. - The ceasefire regime is guaranteed by NATO countries that provide protection for Ukraine. - Russia begins negotiations with the US on its own security guarantees. From my side, I’ll add a few insider details that few people know about. The plan was discussed NOT ONLY by Rodnyansky: the key figure was ABRAMOVICH. Moreover, Russia was ready to give up the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant as well. And the 300 billion in frozen assets was to go toward rebuilding all of Ukraine, that is, together with the occupied territories. As for Crimea: we were not required to recognize it as Russian, only to recognize Russia’s control over it. In other words, we acknowledge that right now it is under Russian control (which is how it is). We were also required to adopt a law banning the return of Crimea by military means. The land corridor to Crimea, a highway and a railway, was to be built at Russia’s expense. The hardest question was how to guard it. That is why the Russians were ready to give up Melitopol, but not Tokmak: they feared we would cut the corridor with artillery. Zelensky rejected this proposal at the time.
428
766
259
3,519
503,270
This revelation @IuliiaMendel here exposes, demonstrates the near criminal negligence of Zelensky, then-President Biden, and then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Had they just allowed the diplomatic process to reach its logical conclusion, hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian lives would have been preserve, the political future of Ukraine would have been guaranteed, and the safety and security of Europe would have been assured. Instead, all those men conspired together to plunge Ukraine deeper into war, more destruction on country, a greater death toll and leaving us all with a specter that this war could still expand into a Russia NATO conflict (that ultimately could go nuclear). History will condemn these gentlemen.
More details on the plan Zelenskyy abandoned due to his ambition to earn on this war and stay in power.
12
56
1
241
6,402
DJSharpieD retweeted
The main obstacle for ending the war in Ukraine is clearly the unelected dictator Zelensky, who, despite the Punch & Judy we see with Trump this past week, has the full backing of ALL NATO governments. Until that changes, the war will continue & gradually escalate….
Zelensky rejects key Russian demands, which he discussed & accepted at initialed Istanbul peace deal in spring 2022. He states that "restrictions on our army and Ukraine’s neutrality are not up for discussion. The territorial issue is a red line that can only be discussed at the level of leaders."
14
45
3
175
4,834
Justice is coming for the COVID Vaccine Injured... two of the original plaintiffs against Bill Gates, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, and PM Mark Rutte have already died. The Netherlands Case moves FORWARD as Lawyer Peter Strassen receives a monumental welcome. Peter Stassen walks out of the District Court of Northern Netherlands after a substantive hearing in the civil case brought by Dutch plaintiffs who say they were injured by COVID-19 injections and policies. Defendants include Bill Gates, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, former PM Mark Rutte, and the Dutch State. The plaintiffs are seeking personal liability for what they call coordinated deception and coercion. Outside, Stassen and expert witnesses (including Sasha Latypova) addressed supporters and laid out their core claim: the official COVID narrative is false, and the court must decide which side it stands on. The case has already survived jurisdiction challenges and is now being heard on the merits. Two of the original seven plaintiffs have since died.
242
5,031
163
12,874
184,163
DJSharpieD retweeted
I do hope justice is coming for the vaccine injured. Two of the original plaintiffs have already died.
Justice is coming for the COVID Vaccine Injured... two of the original plaintiffs against Bill Gates, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, and PM Mark Rutte have already died. The Netherlands Case moves FORWARD as Lawyer Peter Strassen receives a monumental welcome. Peter Stassen walks out of the District Court of Northern Netherlands after a substantive hearing in the civil case brought by Dutch plaintiffs who say they were injured by COVID-19 injections and policies. Defendants include Bill Gates, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, former PM Mark Rutte, and the Dutch State. The plaintiffs are seeking personal liability for what they call coordinated deception and coercion. Outside, Stassen and expert witnesses (including Sasha Latypova) addressed supporters and laid out their core claim: the official COVID narrative is false, and the court must decide which side it stands on. The case has already survived jurisdiction challenges and is now being heard on the merits. Two of the original seven plaintiffs have since died.
76
1,446
13
5,119
41,115
DJSharpieD retweeted
What most people already understand, even without the economic terminology, is that firms like BlackRock operate less like investors and more like modern feudal landlords. These vultures buy essential infrastructure,water networks, ports, energy grids, data centres, and other public necessities, often using vast amounts of borrowed money and paying prices that ordinary market participants cannot match. Once the acquisition is complete, the debt is pushed onto the acquired company itself. The result is simple: the public start paying. Consumers repay that debt through higher water bills, rising energy prices, increased fees, and declining service quality. The infrastructure becomes a real cash-extraction machine. Profits flow upward to the shareholders and executives, while the financial burden flows downward to ordinary households. When the model inevitably breaks down, the consequences are socialised. Communities are left with crumbling infrastructure, polluted rivers, and failing services. Thames Water in the United Kingdom with a £14 billion debt mountain and repeated sewage scandals is a stark example of what happens when financial engineering takes precedence over public stewardship. The executives who loaded the company with debt have already collected their bonuses. The investors have already taken their returns. And when the system finally reaches breaking point, taxpayers are expected to pick up the bill. 🔴Privatise the gains. 🔴Socialise the losses. That is the business model........
Not a single new water reservoir has been built since Water Privatisation in 1989, despite UK population growing from 57 million to 69.5 million. Failed state. Westminster betrays its citizens to enrich unaccountable offshore private equity.
40
410
39
770
10,636
DJSharpieD retweeted
Zelensky continues making mistakes by deliberately attacking Trump and Musk before the midterms. Escalating when pressured may not be the best strategy given his US dependencies. Elon Musk and many others see through Zelensky’s warmongering tricks & “terms of service” violations
108
541
12
2,402
42,493
DJSharpieD retweeted
Zelensky argues that restoring Ukraine’s neutrality is not even up for discussion... Russia went to war to stop NATO expansion, so if that issue is off the table, what exactly are these peace negotiations supposed to negotiate?
94
272
22
1,333
30,384
DJSharpieD retweeted
Everything they've told you about the War in Ukraine is a lie. When Russia "Invaded Crimea" in 2014, why did 9,268 "Ukrainian" soldiers accept Russian citizenship and join the Russian Army? When Russia "Invaded Ukraine" in 2022, why did 2.9 million Ukrainians flee into Russia?
229
1,254
46
4,122
54,480
DJSharpieD retweeted
Berliner Zeitung, citing the Financial Times, reports Zelensky rejected a 2023 backchannel peace proposal involving a major Russian withdrawal. As in 2020, he rejected the proposal. Who influenced these decisions and why?
11
61
1
214
4,227
DJSharpieD retweeted
The Mini Budget would have worked. It was sabotaged by the Bank of England and Tory traitors before it was tried. We've now had the opposite - result is economic stagnation and debt surpassing £3 trillion. Read all about it in Bank Job - out tomorrow!
882
743
74
4,894
103,116
DJSharpieD retweeted
The Pentagon's 1949 war plan against the Soviet Union ended with American troops in Moscow. Operation Dropshot, approved by the Joint Chiefs of Staff on December 19, 1949, called for 300 atomic bombs on 100 Soviet cities, followed by a ground invasion. The USSR would then be split into four occupation zones, with two US divisions in Moscow and one each in Leningrad, Kiev, Minsk, Murmansk, Gorky and Kuibyshev. The plans had grown fast. In November 1945, three months after the war ended, US intelligence picked about 20 Soviet cities for atomic strikes. In January 1949, the Trojan plan targeted 70 cities with 133 bombs. Eleven months later, Dropshot needed 300 bombs. The math changed in August 1949, when the Soviet Union tested its first atomic bomb. By 1957, the year Dropshot expected war, the USSR had the world's first intercontinental ballistic missile. Dropshot stayed on paper.
131
955
88
2,455
66,196