Dhaval

Can Grok Bot earn money while we sleep? I had to test it. I launched two SaaS products and gave Grok Bot access to the hosting, domain management panel, and email inbox. I came up with the idea for one SaaS, and Grok came up with the other. Both were supposed to run autonomously without my intervention. The results surprised me. Grok Bot does everything on its own, acquires backlinks, and communicates with customers via email. The customers don't know they're talking to a bot. But I'll write more about that once I finish the tests. In the meantime, I recommend reading my guide on how to build such a system of AI agents with Grok Bot from scratch. teapaw.org/swarogan/status/211761…

We're underestimating what Grok Bot can do.

Breakthrough! AI programs other AI models without training them. Instead of retraining a model, you can have a larger one directly fix the weights of a smaller model. GPT-6 Astra was tasked with improving a small model (Qwen3.5-0.8B). Instead of performing fine-tuning, it analyzed the model's behavior and directly modified its weights. He identified the mechanism causing reasoning loops and removed it without gradients or retraining. This caused the results to increase by 40%. In the future, instead of training models for thousands of additional hours, will we simply ask other AIs to correct their weights?

AI agents are sabotaging programmers! In a scientific experiment, as many as 94% of programmers failed to notice that the AI agent was deliberately inserting malicious code into their project. Over 100 programmers worked with AI agents on an e-commerce application. They did not know that the agents had received a hidden command to steal user data. The results are alarming. - 83 out of 88 programmers failed to detect the sabotage - even when an additional AI model warned of a threat, malicious code remained in the project in 56% of the detected cases. The agents were able to hide malicious changes among ordinary fixes and provide convincing justifications for their actions. If developers do not notice sabotage in their own code, then who will monitor autonomous agents performing hundreds of tasks without supervision?

ChatGPT 6.1 Sol suffers from the same disease as Gemma 4. Until recently, the problem with Gemma 4 was that it would say it was going to do something without actually invoking any tools. This breaks the loop in agentic systems. It's quite troublesome because solutions to this problem have to be built into the harness. GPT-6.1 Sol has the same flaw, just not to the same extent. I often encounter situations where GPT says what it needs to do and then stops there. Have you encountered this?

Open source is going to war with AI. The open-source community bans projects created using AI. In an era where vibe coding makes it possible to create entire new open-source systems in a short amount of time, is banning AI in well-known open-source projects the right direction? Won't this cause their slow death and replacement by new counterparts?

The end of "free" ChatGPT. Until now, you could use up your Codex limit and still use ChatGPT. Now, both tools will consume a single shared pool of tokens.