Tom Moore (@SirTomMoore) header
Tom Moore (@SirTomMoore) profile picture

Producer/Director https://teapaw.org/t.co/wjAbCxxXrJ DFXTRA/Dogfart Producer Chaos Men Producer Location Rental - https://teapaw.org/t.co/9U24KS41nC… USMC Veteran

Las Vegas
Joined October 2010
Photo by Tom Moore (@SirTomMoore)Photo by Tom Moore (@SirTomMoore)Photo by Tom Moore (@SirTomMoore)Photo by Tom Moore (@SirTomMoore)Photo by Tom Moore (@SirTomMoore)Photo by Tom Moore (@SirTomMoore)Photo by Tom Moore (@SirTomMoore)Photo by Tom Moore (@SirTomMoore)Photo by Tom Moore (@SirTomMoore)Photo by Tom Moore (@SirTomMoore)
Fuck, Suck and Repeat with Sadie Summers @RealDogFartxxx GloryHole.com @originalsadie @Willdothings
2
2
26
1,874
We gotta stop throwing America’s sons and daughters into the damn meat grinder of war just so Raytheon and the military industrial complex can make a shiny penny.
157
1,589
44
10,797
152,534
🚨Following on from the new UK pornography law under the Crime and Policing Act, Iwas recently shown an article by the Daily Mirror reporting on a group of MP’s calling for the banning of webcamming. I did some deeper research into this and here’s what I found. Protecting people from exploitation requires serious evidence and serious scrutiny of the solutions being proposed. I’ve been examining the evidence behind Only Exploitation, the APPG report calling for a ban on commercial sexual livestreaming. It documents genuine concerns: coercive managers, abusive partners, privacy violations and failures in safeguarding. Those deserve action. But evidence that exploitation occurs does not establish that every consenting adult performer is being exploited, or that prohibition would make them safer. One study the report itself cites also identifies positive experiences among performers, including increased confidence, personal development and social connection. Those findings deserve acknowledgement alongside the harms. Research on pornography, laboratory aggression and attitudes towards women also needs careful interpretation. These are different questions from whether consensual webcam work should be prohibited. Where is the comparative evidence that a ban would protect people better than stronger enforcement, accountable platforms and meaningful safeguards? Where is the assessment of lost livelihoods, displacement and increased vulnerability? Independent performers and survivors of exploitation both deserve to be heard. A proposal presented as protecting women must account for the women whose choices, safety and livelihoods it would affect. Thank you @MistressBLondon for bringing the article to my attention. I have posted the full PDF in my private Telegram group if you want to read the full document.
11
30
3
152
25,948
Tom Moore retweeted
Just realized about an hour ago this was released. Great scene. More scenes with Charlie please. And of course more scenes with Eddie and Kris as well. Liked and added to my favorites
1
4
155
Many people assume Republicans are the primary political force pushing their own agenda onto the consensual adult industry. That’s a misconception. Democrats have an extensive history of interfering with the industry as well. The difference is often in the justification: Republicans tend to frame their efforts in terms of morality, while Democrats frequently frame theirs as protection or rescue. Take FOSTA-SESTA in 2018. Both sex workers and anti-trafficking advocates warned that the legislation would make providers less safe and trafficking victims harder to identify and locate. Post-FOSTA-SESTA studies have documented increased violence, economic instability, housing insecurity, and reduced access to client screening and harm reduction tools among sex workers, lending support to many of those warnings. The legislation enjoyed overwhelming bipartisan support. Prominent Democrats, including Senators Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, Amy Klobuchar, Cory Booker, and Kirsten Gillibrand, voted for it. House Democrats also overwhelmingly supported the legislation. California Democrats have been no better. They passed sweeping employment laws that forced performers to restructure our businesses and significantly restricted our ability to work as independent contractors. Our freedom to contract was substantially reduced. Following the passage of Los Angeles County’s Measure B in 2012, supporters pushed Proposition 60 onto the statewide ballot in 2016, despite strong industry objections concerning performer safety, privacy, and freedom to contract. Then there are the fights over Assembly Bill 1576, which threatened bodily autonomy; Cal/OSHA’s extreme “Goggles and Barriers” standard; and Assembly Bill 2389, which threatened freedom to contract. Performer advocacy groups and the Free Speech Coalition @FSCArmy fought these measures, often alongside the Libertarian Party @LPNational and its California affiliates, with vocal support from organizations such as the Cato Institute @CatoInstitute and Reason Foundation @reason. @TheDemocrats are NOT automatically on our side. Nobody who insists they know what’s best for us while disregarding our objections is acting in our interests. The Free Speech Coalition, the adult industry’s principal trade organization, has spent years lobbying both parties on regulations affecting performers and producers. These policy battles have continued across administrations, states, and party lines. The consistent demand has been simple: performers deserve meaningful input into laws governing our work, our safety, and our livelihoods. We deserve a seat at the table when government decides to regulate our industry, just like any other industry. And that’s what Democrats keep missing. Protecting adult entertainers and sex workers requires listening to the people whose lives and livelihoods are affected, not simply deciding what’s best for us. No laws about us without us. @LP_CLC
8
14
3
82
7,066
Tom Moore retweeted
Downlow Boys ♥ Jake Waters & Chad Rexx ★ @TheChadRexx @jake_watersxx #DownlowBoys See More → 🎥 [ mansurfer.com/video/358618/j… ]
1
24
1
166
6,767
Tom Moore retweeted
What a great scene to film. Working with @TheChadRexx was so much fun. Great personality, spirit, and a kind soul. The energy between us an amazing. Thank you @SirTomMoore for this opportunity. Make sure you don’t miss this one!
This quoted post is unavailable.
2
9
1,452
🚨New ANAL scene🎬🚨 🗓️December 4th 2026 🎞️@RealDogFartxxx 🎬@SirTomMoore 🖤@Willdothings 💋@liz_skylar
16
35
330
14,486
The mass purge of legal content following the UK's new pornography restrictions is a textbook example of how ill-defined speech laws erode our digital rights. Facing severe criminal liabilities under these broad and ambiguous guidelines, platforms have deployed blunt auto-moderation filters, resulting in hundreds of thousands of legal consensual videos being taken down. Beyond destroying independent livelihoods, this over-censorship creates a chilling effect that deters ordinary citizens from exercising free speech, while forcing algorithmic filters to misinterpret and erase queer relationship terminology, kink archetypes, and trans identity spaces as "prohibited." Read more ⤵️ 404media.co/clips4sale-conte…
13
80
6
351
22,676
Porn is an unpopular thing to defend. Yet although England’s stricter rules will please moralists, they should alarm anyone who cares about freedom of speech or government overreach economist.com/leaders/2026/1…
79
425
42
2,198
142,543
Tom Moore retweeted
Repeal the porn laws 🌽 My leader for @TheEconomist
40
512
24
4,197
136,074
🚨New ANAL scene🎬🚨 🗓️December 4th 2026 🎞️@RealDogFartxxx 🎬@SirTomMoore 🖤@Willdothings 💋@liz_skylar
19
39
401
19,932
This is the pro-censorship UK politician behind the anti-porn law that went into effect yesterday. Not even she knows what her bill will end up prohibiting. Enforcement will be based on vibes. Criminalizing consensual behavior ALWAYS ends up in discretionary enforcement:
This quoted post is unavailable.
33
533
10
5,918
160,029