No matter which party wins, it's a reason for more war. This is the American "democratic system".
The sickness is the system. Corruption wall to wall.
A strong pro-Ukraine post election wind at our back, we must push right away to impose sanctions waived by Trump, stop his despicable diesel deal, provide military aid, particularly air defense—& other measures to show support necessary to bring Putin to serious peace talks. washingtonpost.com/opinions/…
3
47
Anthropic:
We're probably going to destroy the world but we go ahead anyway. If we don't destroy the world someone else will...
Anthropic says that even the entire insurance industry in the aggregate will not have the capacity to insure the catastrophic risk that ANTHROPIC ITSELF poses to the world
lol
1
61
If you are in Cuba starving or you had enough living without electricity and healthcare supplies due to the brutal US blockade, contact the CIA discretely to make a positive change.
Life is full of opportunities, you just need to seek them.
4
50
The trillionaire who runs Ukraine's military satellite system operations (for profit and power) is concerned about poor people sent to die in war while elites getting rich out of it.
You can't make that up!
3
36
US corporations elect political leaders around the world, in Latin America in particular.
This is what democracy has evolved to be in the unipolar world. It's quite different from how most people perceive it.
This is a huge scandal: The campaign of Brazil's far-right, US-backed presidential candidate Flávio Bolsonaro paid a US company that sells an AI system for manipulating elections.
Bolsonaro's right-wing party also paid the US company, which maps voters and makes fake social media accounts to spread disinformation online targeting crucial voters.
This revelation comes after Meta admitted that it censored the accounts of left-wing candidate Lula da Silva and promoted Bolsonaro on Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp.
This is the source (only in Portuguese): intercept.com.br/2026/10/16/…
18
Sivan Tal retweeted
I have lived in China since 1995.
I saw the poverty with my own eyes. Then I watched it disappear.
This chart going viral today tells the story > China extreme poverty: 91.3% in 1984.
Zero by 2022. No colour revolution.
No IMF lectures. No NGOs.
Planning, roads, factories, schools. And the West still calls it a "failed system"….
Ed Yardeni wrote that the US bond yield rise is a good sign, whereis the similar rise in French bond yields signals a looming debt crisis.
Now, the US gov debt is $40.3 trillion and the French gov debt is $4.2 trillion. The two countries have a similar debt/GDP ratio of about 120%.
One must ask: How come the US doesn't have a debt crisis?
Understanding that is understanding how the global financial system works, and in essence - who rules the world.
1
1
70
They impose illegal unilateral sanctions to choke the people of targeted nations, and if the offended party tries to survive anyway, they call it a 'monster'.
nytimes.com/2026/09/24/busin…
1
39
You let the US tech corporates into your country - you get politically captured. That's modern day imperiay, operated by "soft power".
Another example for why China, Russia, Iran, North Korey block US corporations from operating their "free media" in their countries. It's self-defense.
Breaking: US company Meta has, without explanation, disabled Lula’s Instagram and Facebook profiles’ ability to run ads, 10 days from election.
The President’s campaign has complained and threatened legal action, citing this as another example of US interference and manipulation.
54
Trump pledge before the presidential election: No more endless wars
Trump pledge today: More endless wars
Only 70 million Americans believed him then. I think that most Americans believe him now. The continuity of agenda across presidents was quite clear all the time. They all promite and conduct endless wars, with differences merely rhetorical.
20
"Despite the political theater of emerging splits between the US and its client states unfolding, US client states are spending more now than at any other time following the end of the Cold War on military capabilities — either buying additional weapons from the US itself or diverting public spending from social programs into military industrial production to support ongoing US wars and proxy wars around the globe.
The irony is that while the governments among US client states point at Russia, China, Iran, and other nations as “threats” to peace, stability, and prosperity — it is their subordination to the US and their obedient participation in US wars and proxy wars actively destroying their respective economies and ruining the lives of their respective populations."
A must-read by @BrianJBerletic
journal-neo.su/2026/09/15/th…
19
