Far middle extremist. "The prevailing emotion will be one of nostalgia for those left behind, combined with a spirit of bold curiosity for the adventure ahead!"
Joined February 2022
- Tweets36K
- Following108
- Followers388
- Likes94.8K
Sleep Forever retweeted
Według sondaży prezydentu Nawrockiemu ufa już 83% Polaków.
Rząd Tuska jest w przerażony wynikami badań społecznych. 8 na 10 Polaków chce aresztowania Donalda Tuska.
Sleep Forever retweeted
❗Ekipa Tuska w budynku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego oszalała do końca.
Myślą, że jak wykasują dane na stronie internetowej to zmienią rzeczywistość.
Okazuje się, że Korwin-Piotrowska zmienia informacje dotyczące Trybunału Konstytucyjnego.
Kasuje i zmienia: datę złożenia ślubowania wobec Prezydenta RP, funkcję prezesa i zastępcy prezesa, sędziego Wyrembaka, dopisała do listy sędziów siebie, Berka, Markiewicza, Taborowskiego, Dziurde. To jest przerażające.
Na stronie internetowej @TK_GOV_PL okupanci budynku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego wprowadzają nowe informacje - oczywiście według własnego uznania. To jest normalne zachowanie?
Sleep Forever retweeted
🚨UNEO BANK COLLAPSE RIOTS ESCALATE: ⚠️Paraguayans are now dragging politicians out of Congress as anger mounts in Paraguay... 👀
Sleep Forever retweeted
The story in Paraguay is insane.
The Epstein class took over the banking and political systems and used PUBLIC MONEY to enrich themselves.
This is what’s happening EVERYWHERE. That’s why it’s being ignored. It’s all part of the plan.
UPDATE: 🇵🇾 PARAGUAY’S PRESIDENT RESIGNS IN DISGRACE AFTER “FRAUD OF THE CENTURY”
(FYI, similar conditions exist in our countries…)
Paraguay’s President, Santiago Peña, has been forced to resign in DISGRACE, after shocking details of his MANY connections to what’s being described as the "biggest FRAUD of the century” came to light.
1. Peña was a business partner of the conglomerate that owns Ueno Bank, the largest digital bank in Paraguay, until 2025…
2. Peña personally accepted two “highly irregular private loans” directly from Ueno Bank during his tenure.
3. Peña used his presidential platform to shield the bank from inspectors, aggressively dismissing financial warnings as "fear-mongering" to keep public money flowing into the fraudulent bank.
4. Shortly after becoming president, he appointed Ueno’s former chief executive to run the country’s central bank…
Think about that.
The person overseeing the bank previously ran the bank… The fox was literally guarding the henhouse (we have the same situation in the west..)
And guess who is on the hook to bail them all out? The taxpayer…
AND THATS NOT ALL
1. Under Peña, Ueno Bank started as a niche digital app and suddenly became the government's preferred bank. Funneling MASSIVE State Wealth into his friends pockets.
2. This included LOOTING PENSIONS by forcing ~$380M of workers' health and pension funds into Ueno.
3. While the government was pumping public money into Uneo, executives were quietly shoveling it out in the form of MASSIVE UNCOLLATERALISED “INSIDER LOANS”
The taxes, life savings and pensions of citizens were used as a personal slush fund, with no assets left behind to cover the bad debts.
By the time it collapsed, 25% of all the bank's deposits consisted of public funds….
Opposition lawmakers are FURIOUS, 8 bank executives have been arrested. 27 other bank officials and business associates face severe criminal charges.
Don’t forget, this could happen ANYWHERE. Our banking and market systems are corrupt and stressed. My advice? Save in physical gold and silver.
Sleep Forever retweeted
BREAKING: 🇵🇾 What just happened in PARAGUAY is a WARNING for everyone on earth.
More than 3 million people (60% of Paraguay's adult population) have lost access to EVERYTHING. Their bank accounts. Their pensions. Frozen. Inaccessible.
Paraguay’s largest digital bank, Ueno Bank, has collapsed.
The president of the Central Bank (who is deeply connected to Ueno) has just RESIGNED. Eight high-level executives including the founder and the Bank President are being detained.
The people have taken to the streets to demand their money back. And rightly so.
This is the model Milei and the rest of the Epstein class are pushing. This could happen ANYWHERE. Best to save in physical gold and physical silver, imo.
Sleep Forever retweeted
🚨 BOMBSHELL COURT EVIDENCE — PRIVATE MESSAGES EXPOSE TROUBLING COORDINATION AROUND WHITEHEAD’S DEI SURVEY IN THE DAVID M. SABATINI ORDEAL
🔱 NEW REVELATION — Following our exposé of the Whitehead Institute Board’s continued defense of its leadership and its deeply compromised 2021 investigative process—whose integrity is now seriously challenged by extensive court evidence and the jury’s $6 million verdict against Kristin Knouse for defamation and tortious interference—additional court evidence exposes deeply troubling private communications between Knouse and Tina Lopez, including explicit references to Whitehead Director Ruth Lehmann.
On October 20–21, 2020, Knouse and Lopez discussed Whitehead Institute’s anticipated anonymous DEI survey, encouraging additional allegations and addressing concerns about anonymity. In these exchanges, Knouse explicitly referenced Whitehead Director Ruth Lehmann, while Lopez expressed extraordinary personal loyalty to Knouse.
These communications raise serious questions about how Whitehead’s DEI survey was used to advance Knouse’s efforts against Professor @DMSabatini, what its leadership knew, and whether the subsequent investigation was genuinely independent.
1. Coordinating submissions to Whitehead’s DEI survey
After discussing an anticipated anonymous survey concerning harassment, racism, and bullying, Knouse encouraged Lopez (@KristinaELopez) to submit information and wrote:
🔴 “carpe diem my friend ....”
🔴 “this is your chance to report what anna told you ....”
When Lopez expressed concern about being identified, Knouse emphasized the survey’s purported anonymity.
2. Knouse explicitly discussed obtaining additional sources
Knouse wrote:
🔴 “ruth basically knows already”
🔴 “just need more sources to say the same shit now”
🔴 “so i dont seem like a psycho”
She subsequently encouraged another potential participant to contribute, writing:
🔴 “help my case plz”
3. Tina Lopez’s extraordinary declarations of loyalty
Lopez told Knouse:
🔴 “Hey with your blessing I'll do just about anything”
Later, she declared:
🔴 “Anyway I'm #teamKristin ride or die”
These exchanges raise serious questions about personal loyalty, influence, and the independence of allegations submitted through institutional reporting channels.
4. Direct references to Whitehead Director Ruth Lehmann
Knouse stated:
🔴 “nah i think ruth knows to hold the horses”
🔴 “i told ruth this”
And later:
🔴 “here's hoping we got AA and ruth in our side cars”
These statements warrant examination of what Whitehead leadership knew, when it knew it, and whether appropriate safeguards protected the independence of the investigative process.
⚠️ THE INSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY QUESTION
The scientific community has already seen the jury’s $6 million verdict against Kristin Knouse for defamation and tortious interference.
Now these private messages expose how Knouse and Lopez discussed using Whitehead’s anticipated DEI survey to advance allegations, recruit additional voices, and address concerns about anonymity.
Whitehead Institute (@WhiteheadInst), Director Ruth Lehmann (@REMLehmann), Board Chair Sarah K. Williamson (@SWilliamsonFCLT), and the Board of Directors must publicly address these documentary revelations.
We call for an independent, evidence-based review of the DEI survey, the subsequent investigation, relevant leadership communications, and the institutional decisions that followed.
🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team
MORE COURT EVIDENCE. MORE REVELATIONS. STAY TUNED. ⚠️
@SciGuardians 🔱
🚨 BREAKING — EXPOSING A SHAMEFUL WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE BOARD COMMUNICATION FOLLOWING THE $6 MILLION SABATINI–KNOUSE JURY VERDICT
ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team has obtained a formal communication dated October 19, 2026, from Sarah K. Williamson, Chair of the Whitehead Institute Board of Directors, to the Institute’s community.
🚨 THE BOMBSHELL: Just three days after the October 16, 2026 jury verdict finding Kristin Knouse liable for defamation and tortious interference with Professor David M. Sabatini’s contractual and prospective professional relationships, awarding him $6 million in damages, and rejecting all of Knouse’s counterclaims, Sarah Williamson reaffirmed the @WhiteheadInst Board’s “full confidence” in Director Ruth Lehmann, the Institute’s workplace policies, and the process behind its 2021 investigation.
⚖️ THE CRITICAL LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE OF THE VERDICT:
The jury did not merely find that Knouse defamed Sabatini. It also found her liable for tortious interference with his existing contractual and prospective professional relationships, awarding $5.5 million of the total $6 million specifically for those interference claims.
The tortious-interference findings involved a “but-for” causation standard, under which the relevant harm would not have occurred without Knouse’s wrongful conduct.
These findings raise serious questions about Whitehead’s continued defense of its 2021 investigative process, particularly given the jury’s determination that Knouse’s wrongful conduct caused substantial harm to Sabatini’s professional relationships. Whitehead must explain how its unequivocal institutional confidence can be reconciled with the jury’s verdict and the extensive court evidence documenting how its DEI survey and subsequent institutional processes were used to advance Knouse’s efforts against Sabatini.
Sarah Williamson (@SWilliamsonFCLT) must understand the potentially devastating consequences of such unequivocal institutional support, particularly in light of:
> The $6 million jury verdict against Kristin Knouse for defamation and tortious interference.
> The jury’s findings of causation and liability for interference with Sabatini’s professional relationships.
> Private messages celebrating Sabatini’s removal and anticipating the revocation of his tenure.
> Court evidence raising serious questions about insider influence over MIT’s tenure-review committee selection.
> Communications between senior MIT and Whitehead leadership before the completion of MIT’s tenure-review process.
> Private messages discussing the concealment of Whitehead’s investigation behind a diversity survey.
> Sexually explicit exchanges involving Knouse and colleagues or trainees, raising questions about inconsistent professional conduct standards.
Defending leadership facing such serious questions risks irreparable damage to Williamson’s credibility, reputation, and fitness to remain Chair of the Whitehead Institute Board of Directors.
The ordeal has inflicted devastating personal and professional consequences on Professor @DMSabatini. The $6 million jury award must mark the beginning, not the end, of accountability. Every individual and institution found responsible for wrongdoing in this ordeal must face appropriate legal consequences. Institutional loyalty cannot substitute for justice and accountability.
⚠️ AND MORE EXPLOSIVE EVIDENCE IS YET TO COME.
ScienceGuardians™ will soon release new documentary evidence exposing deeply troubling private communications between Kristin Knouse and Tina Lopez (@KristinaELopez), including explicit references to Whitehead Director Ruth Lehmann (@REMLehmann), raising serious questions about behind-the-scenes coordination, extraordinary personal loyalties, and the disturbing dynamics surrounding the David M. Sabatini ordeal.
NO INSTITUTION. NO DIRECTOR. NO BOARD CHAIR IS ABOVE ACCOUNTABILITY.
🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team
MORE COURT EVIDENCE. MORE REVELATIONS. STAY TUNED. ⚠️
@SciGuardians 🔱
Sleep Forever retweeted
At some point, red, blue, left and right, became descriptions of people. We started using them to decide who belonged with us, who stood against us, and what kind of person lived on the other side of a state line.
But where did these labels come from, and why do we give them so much power?
In my latest free article, I explore the origins of political left and right, the occult symbolism of opposing forces, and the curious business of placing George Washington among the gods above the Capitol Rotunda. Baphomet and the ancient chariot factions make appearances along the way.
If you’ve had enough election commentary, come look at the history beneath the symbols.
Red and Blue State Spellcraft: The hidden history of left and right, and the symbols that divide us.
Link attached.
Sleep Forever retweeted
Demokracja według Unii Europejskiej. Niemieckie wojsko w Polsce. Urszula von der Leyen wysyła niemieckie wojsko do Polski. Donald Tusk wydał zgodę. Media o tym milczą. To musi zobaczyć świat.
Sleep Forever retweeted
The same pattern keeps coming back, and once you see the code you can't unsee it. Watch my Series realityrevolt.com/
Sleep Forever retweeted
🤯🤬
“I may just try to get some $$…”
“…I saw that a girl sued NYU for one racist comment and got 2 million dollars…”
“But honestly maybe I’d rather get grants and paper acceptances than money…”
—MIT’s MeToo hoaxers Dr. Kristin Knouse and Izabella Pena discuss the anticipated spoils of their war against David Sabatini at MIT:
Pena hoped for a cash payout of some kind while Knouse wanted career favors she hadn’t earned.
(It’s also interesting how Knouse seemed intent on blaming Sabatini for her own stalling career and lack of productivity, despite the fact that he seemed to have bent over backward trying to offer mentorship and emotional support, no strings attached.)
Sleep Forever retweeted
🚨 BOMBSHELL COURT EVIDENCE — THE IDENTITY OF “ELIZABETH” IN KRISTIN KNOUSE AND IZABELLA PEÑA’S PRIVATE MESSAGES: LEAD INVESTIGATOR ELIZABETH J. McEVOY.
🔱 NEW REVELATION — Explosive private communications between Kristin Knouse and Izabella Peña identify a troubling connection to Elizabeth McEvoy, one of the lead investigators at Hinckley Allen & Snyder (HAS), whose investigation formed the basis of Whitehead Institute's actions against Professor David M. Sabatini.
In August 2021, @WhiteheadInst Director Ruth Lehmann (@REMLehmann) publicly announced that concerns arising from an institutional Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) survey had led to the appointment of Hinckley Allen & Snyder LLP to investigate the @DMSabatini laboratory. She cited the investigation's findings in announcing Sabatini's immediate departure from Whitehead and HHMI.
Elizabeth McEvoy was one of the lead investigators involved in that inquiry — the very investigation whose findings carried devastating consequences for Sabatini's scientific career.
Now consider the extraordinary private message Kristin Knouse sent to Izabella Peña on October 18, 2021:
🔴 “Yea I mean before my interviews they prepped me intensely. But it really helped because as Elizabeth and WI said they were completely convinced.”
That “Elizabeth” is Elizabeth McEvoy — one of the lead investigators entrusted with conducting the supposedly independent inquiry.
“COMPLETELY CONVINCED.”
These words, appearing in Knouse's own private communications, raise serious questions about the impartiality of the investigation, the preparation of witnesses, and whether investigators approached the evidence with an open mind.
An investigation with such devastating professional consequences must itself be held to the highest standards of independence, fairness, and accountability.
📑 REVIEW THE ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE BELOW.
🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team
MORE COURT EVIDENCE. MORE REVELATIONS. STAY TUNED. ⚠️
@SciGuardians 🔱
🚨 BOMBSHELL COURT EVIDENCE EXPOSES A SHOCKING FOCUS ON PERCEPTION OVER TRUTH — KRISTIN KNOUSE'S PRIVATE MESSAGES REVEAL “THE LONG GAME” IN THE DAVID M. SABATINI ORDEAL.
🔱 NEW REVELATION — Court evidence exposes extraordinary private communications between Kristin Knouse and Izabella Peña, revealing discussions of perception, personal hostility, intensive interview preparation, and institutional support.
On October 18, 2021, Knouse recounted advice she had received:
🔴 “But she said something like ‘Kristin it’s not about truth but perception…you want to play the long game’”
In the same conversation, Knouse acknowledged her personal hostility toward Sabatini:
🔴 “It’s the same about me not being able to show how angry I am or how much I hate him because it feeds his story that I’m a resentful bitch.”
She also described the preparation she received before her interviews:
🔴 “Yea I mean before my interviews they prepped me intensely. But it really helped because as Elizabeth and WI said they were completely convinced.”
Izabella Peña subsequently wrote:
🔴 “She said the same: the long game”
And:
🔴 “And she said the WI is on my side”
Coming after our previous revelations concerning Whitehead's investigation, the documented communications involving @MIT Professor Sangeeta Bhatia (@snbhatia), and the institutional decisions that devastated Sabatini's career, Exhibit 228 adds another deeply troubling dimension to the documentary record.
These are the participants' own contemporaneous private messages, documenting their accounts of interview preparation, personal hostility, advice concerning perception rather than truth, a long-term approach, and institutional support.
📑 REVIEW THE ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE BELOW.
🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team
MORE COURT EVIDENCE. MORE REVELATIONS. STAY TUNED. ⚠️
@SciGuardians 🔱
Sleep Forever retweeted
A medic who revealed the existence of a secret prison in Petropavlovskaya Borshchagovka is being threatened with death, including by commanders of NGU and AFU units
He’s saying that he found Ukrainian people in trouble and just wanted to help them but he is now already being threatened by Ukrainian national guard and some AFU units (most likely Nazi) ..they will probably kill him .
Sleep Forever retweeted
🤯
“We should all threaten to kill ourselves if he doesn’t lose tenure.”
“No, the world needs us.”
—MeToo hoaxers Kristin Knouse, Isabella Pena, and Tina Lopez considered how best to manipulate MIT into revoking David Sabatini’s tenure. (It was easy for them, as MIT rolled over without a second thought. The tenure revocation was basically rigged.)
Sleep Forever retweeted
HE IS 14 YEARS OLD.
This boy was held in a basement in Ukraine for a month. He was found among roughly 40 detained men in a place some have described as a torture chamber.
What possible justification could there be for holding a child there?
Sleep Forever retweeted
Not a single word from the Dutch Government, not a single word from the Dutch mainstream media about the torture chamber near Kiev.
When SILENCE EQUALS COMPLICITY!
Are Dutch people happy to see their money spent on tortures?
Can you look in the eyes of this poor boy?
Sleep Forever retweeted
The woman who exposed a secret Azov detention facility in Petropavlivska Borshchahivka near Kyiv yesterday — where mobilized men and deserters were reportedly beaten and held against their will — has now been arrested.
And right on cue, the entire pro-government media machine and its army of bloggers have sprung into action.
Their target?
The woman who exposed it.
They're working overtime to paint her as a paid Kremlin agent and a provocateur.
Meanwhile, the questions that actually matter have conveniently vanished from the headlines.
Why were the men held inside that civilian building covered in bruises?
Why were they denied medical care?
Why did groups of violent thugs, mobilized by Azov, descend on protesters to the sound of the OUN march, attacking people indiscriminately — including journalists?
And why hasn't a single one of those attackers been arrested yet?
Instead, all the attention is now focused on the woman who brought to light a secret detention site where men's fundamental rights appear to have been violated.
How incredibly convenient.
This is the "beacon of freedom and democracy" that Brussels is backing and financing.
Sleep Forever retweeted
So, let me get this straight:
This little coke head asshole has been given $196 billion of American tax dollars, blows up diesel refineries, kidnaps people off the street, and now has been caught running black site torture dens with victims as young as 14 years old.
And, America is still supporting this guy instead of ending this war entirely?
Seriously, what are we doing anymore…
Sleep Forever retweeted
To musi zobaczyć Europa i cały świat. W tajnym więzieniu pod Kijowem najmłodszy torturowany miał 14 lat. Oto prawdziwa twarz dzisiejszej Ukrainy. To musi zobaczyć świat.
Sleep Forever retweeted
Some of the nastiest and most mean-spirited people you will ever encounter exist in academia, especially among people at roughly the same career stage.
Here we see one of Sabatini’s colleagues—Sangeeta Bhatia, a prominent figure at MIT of roughly the same age, but nowhere near his scientific caliber—actively cheering the destruction of his career.
She knew that he had devoted his life to science. Publicly, she presents herself as committed to truth and the advancement of science and technology. Behind the scenes, the record shows her participating in dirty tactics to destroy a rival inside MIT and prevent him from working anywhere else.
So much of academia is built around an age-related hierarchy. Those entering the system at the same time grapple and jockey for position, and this can expose extraordinarily unethical behavior.
Metoo was only one of many causes weaponized inside science. Rarely, however, do we get to see what years of court discovery and weeks of trial reveal about how vicious professors can be toward one another.
🤯
“Hard to imagine how he can be gainfully employed anywhere after this…”
—MeToo hoaxer Kristin Knouse and her MIT accomplices were not content to run David Sabatini out of MIT. They also lobbied private biotech companies to fire him and worked to ensure that no one would hire him anywhere.
What’s shocking about this is that Knouse had spent a lot of time with Sabatini’s son during their friendship, so she knew that she was hurting his child’s financial future too. Evil.
@SciGuardians for the info
Sleep Forever retweeted
🥲🥲🤯
“I cannot think of anything else while this is hanging over my head…”
—MIT MeToo hoax target David Sabatini pleaded with his supervisor Ruth Lehmann to give him a fair investigation, and it’s clear he was suffering. Little did he know that the fix against him was already in.
Lehmann assured him there was no “pre-judgment,” but we know from texts and court depositions that Lehmann had already conspired with Knouse and others to bring him down. Their plan was to use the DEI survey as a “cover-up” to sink him. See documents below.
