Snord retweeted
Do not ignore the genocide in Gaza.
Do not ignore the genocide in Lebanon.
Do not ignore the genocide in Sudan.
Do not ignore the genocide in Congo.
Do not ignore the genocide in Indonesia
Snord retweeted
Replying to @FNaFFangameWiki
seems to be worth pointing out that the animatronic models in this game are likely ai-generated, really sucks to know because i enjoyed playing this. there's no disclaimer on the game page at all
Snord retweeted
elon abandoning his child gif
🚫 @elonmusk is no longer following @ChainChomp131
Still followed by: @photomatt, @shivon, @grimezsz, @ryanfang95, @justinsuntron & 1 more
$TSLA $SPCX
Snord retweeted
New trailer for ‘RAY GUNN’, directed by Brad Bird (‘The Incredibles’).
The film follows a private detective who is drawn into a case involving aliens & murder in the alternate futuristic city Metropia.
Releasing December 18 on Netflix.
I had a dream I had a dog that was kidnapped by aliens disguised as humans for 5 minutes then they returned the dog because it was a accident and they gave me a survey.
2
77
Snord retweeted
I am officially announcing my campaign to become the CEO of NVIDIA. I will pop the AI bubble, return NVIDIA to a gaming-first company, and bring down GPU prices. Console prices will then fall too. China can send all the beautiful spies they want, and we'll see what happens.
NVIDIA announces CEO transition. Read the release: nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/n…
Snord retweeted
There is an entire video game that tells you why this might be a very VERY bad idea.
Snord retweeted
You know how the treasures & artefacts of colonised countries end up in some rich white person’s living room while the history & achievements of the country is erased from textbooks or never taught & replaced by propaganda calling them savage? It’s happening to Michael Jackson.
Snord retweeted
This zoomer pulled himself by his bootstraps and now the boomer casinos won’t pay him the money he’s owed
This 24 year old guy figured out how to beat a casino and won $800,000
The casino refused to pay him and gave him back just $50,000 and when he complained to gambling regulators, they sided with the casino.
His name is Thomas McPeek, he’s from Chicago who still lives with his parents.
Early 2024
- spends months reading sports betting books
- studies football parlays
- discovers Caesars is offering odds he believes are mathematically mispriced
He realizes he might have found a way to beat the house.
August 2024
McPeek walks into Horseshoe Casino in Indiana with around $30,000.
Instead of placing a few enormous bets, he spends an entire week making hundreds of small wagers through self-service kiosks.
(He doesn’t want the casino noticing his strategy)
By the end of the week, he’s won $350,000.
September 2024
He travels to another Caesars casino in Iowa.
Same strategy.
Another $450,000.
October 2024
McPeek returns to Horseshoe to collect his money.
But Caesars has other plans.
The casino voids his winning tickets, accusing him of coordinating bets across state lines and splitting his wagers into smaller amounts to circumvent its rules.
Instead of paying his winnings, Caesars returns his original $50,000.
And that’s it.
Another casino, Blue Chip, had already paid him $127,000 using his betting strategy.
They simply banned him from coming back.
McPeek complains to gambling regulators in Indiana and Iowa.
Both side with Caesars.
2025
McPeek takes Caesars to federal court, demanding the winnings he believes he’s owed.
Caesars argues that he violated the rules he agreed to when placing the bets and asks the court to dismiss his lawsuit.
McPeek responds:
“It’s not like I can snap my fingers and make the bets win. They still have to win.”
And he’s still fighting for his money.
Imagine spending months learning how to beat the house, actually beating it, and then being told your winning tickets don’t count.
But if those same bets had lost, would the casino have returned his $50,000?
Tbh I don’t think so.



































